Sunday, 23 August 2009

Letter to Dr. Shyam Sunder of NIST — Richard Gage, AIA

Request for meeting regarding NIST Reports - WTC7 and Twin Towers

[Ed: Copy of original letter dated July 20, 2009]
Dear Dr. Sunder,

We have heard you state publicly after the WTC 7 press conference that it "would not be productive" for you to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. This is quite disappointing – as we now have over 700 architects and engineers at AE911Truth calling for a real investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rises on 9/11. At what point will you take us seriously? Perhaps when our rapidly growing numbers reach 1,000 A/E's?

Here are our talking points:

1. The NIST November 2008 Final WTC 7 Investigative Report has many fatal flaws:
a. NIST was forced to acknowledge the free-fall collapse of Building 7 for 100 feet of its 6.5 second fall only after being grilled publicly by experts who are petition signers of AE911Truth. Yet you do not acknowledge the obvious implications of such free-fall collapse – that the structure had to have been removed – forcibly – by explosives. (Anyone knows that a building cannot collapse at the rate of a freely falling object while simultaneously crushing 40,000 tons of structural steel – because all of its gravitational potential energy has been converted to motion.)
Read entire letter (pdf)

Those who have knowingly engaged in the cover up and falsification of scientific data to hide clear evidence that 911 could only have been an inside job make themselves complicit in the crime itself. That's tantamount to Treason.

Inevitably criminal investigations will round up those involved in the crime AND the cover up. Those that offer information that help with the case may find their sentences reduced.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, August 23rd, 2009.]

No comments: