Saturday, 1 October 2016

Nothing to See Here, Move Along...

US regime change in the Middle East.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, October 1st, 2016.]

Syrian War Report – September 28/29, 2016: US & Allies to Arm ‘Opposition’ with MANPADS/US Deploys Troops Near Aleppo City

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, October 1st, 2016.]

Request for Senate Inquiry into Syrian War Coverage on the Australian Public Broadcaster - A Letter

Dear Senator Xenophon,

There is something seriously wrong with our media (the ABC) when it comes to coverage of conflict which involves the USA. So serious is the misreporting that I ask you to hold a senate inquiry into the public broadcaster on this matter.

Public money has been spent on what are essentially propagandised accounts of the fighting in the Middle East, namely in Syria, and elsewhere. Heavily biased reporting, actual misrepresentation of fact, is a direct violation of the ABC's Code of Practice.

I write to you because repeated emails I've sent to the ABC, with corrections to the record, seem to have fallen on deaf ears and I no longer receive any replies. People are being killed and conflicts sustained thanks to our participation in pushing war facilitating propaganda.

In specific reference to Syria and the current Battle of Aleppo, the media frames what is happening as a fight between 'rebels' and 'activists' against a brutal regime intent on indiscriminately killing civilians and bombing hospitals. This characterisation is demonstrably false - which begs the question; how can professional journalists get this so wrong?

For starters, if one consults the Wikipedia page on the Battle of Aleppo, a source not prone to pushing 'conspiratorial narratives', you can see that the main opposition belligerents are listed as The Free Syrian Army (FSA) followed by extremist jihadi groups all of which fire into Government occupied areas killing civilians and soldiers alike. The Syrian Arab Army (SAA) is fighting these groups.

Moreover, the FSA is actively co-operating with fundamentalist forces and is itself non-secular. It is also no longer a leading fighting group, but more accurately a conduit for arms into the war zone (see the recent interview featuring the Al Nusra commander later in this letter, and the Robert Fisk interviews toward the end). Wikipedia also supports the contention that the FSA is not a leading fighting group:

The big problem with the mainstream media (including the ABC) is that it obfuscates what is really happening on the ground.

When independent journalists and Western peace activists visit the war zone they report that the Syrian Government is in a fight against extremists, pointing out that a majority of the population fled because of radical terrorist groups, and that they fled into Government controlled areas - and that President Assad is not simply attacking civilians.

In 2013 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Mairead Maguire, as part of a fact finding tour, discovered from interviews with refugees within Syria, and also in Lebanon, that the people had not been terrorised by the Government, but by armed gangs:

Syria: Nobel Peace Laureate Tells Her Account of What She Witnessed

There are a multitude of independent reports saying the same thing.

Recently, in 2016, US Peace Council representatives reported the same circumstance at the United Nations but underlined the fact that the West was supporting an insurgency in what they said was a proxy war:

US Peace Council Representatives CONFRONT a hostile American press after visiting Syria

The groups that are reporting the opposite, that this is simply a civil war, are the opposition-linked (and untrustworthy) Syrian Observatory for Human Rights based in London, the mainstream press(!), and (admittedly) some sections of the Sunni population of Syria who have sided with the extremists. However, in relation to this last point, the majority moderate Sunnis actually support the Syrian Government and the core of the Syrian Arab Army is actually comprised mostly of Sunnis, including senior commanders:

Why Assad's Army Has Not Defected

Despite the fact that the war in Syria is clearly a fight between secular forces and foreign supported extremists, and that this is an open secret, the US and its allies shamelessly continue to pour weapons into the opposition side.

An interview conducted by German journalist Jürgen Todenhöfer with an Al Nusra (Al Qaeda) commander operating in the Aleppo area revealed that they were well aware that arms, including anti-tank weapons and actual tanks, were being fuelled to their groups via moderate 'fronts'. Most alarmingly was the claim that these extremists had direct training from the US, the Saudis and Israelis:

'Americans know their weapons will end up in hands of terrorists' - Al-Nusra commander interviewer

In the interview Todenhöfer brings up the fact that the US and its allies have been actively supporting extremist groups in Syria since at least August 2012, where he cites a famous (at least within the independent media) declassified US Defence Intelligence Agency document.

The DIA document states that the "The West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey" were supporting the Syrian opposition whose leading groups comprised of 'Salafists, the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq]' with the intention of creating a blocking force to stop Syrian, Iraqi and Iranian cooperation in the region:

2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document: West will facilitate rise of Islamic State “in order to isolate the Syrian regime”

It is very important to note that there is further evidence to suggest that outside involvement in the Syrian (proxy) War goes back to the very beginning of the conflict and even before fighting broke out - another point overlooked in the mainstream media account of this conflict.

Australian academic, Professor Tim Anderson wrote a book, The Dirty War on Syria, that fully explained the initial fighting, where outside involvement and violence was directed against the Syrian Government and police, beginning in 2011. He addresses the media limits put on reporting of the conflict and how the liberal left is largely absent when it comes to addressing what is happening. The following interview with Professor Anderson covers a lot of ground on what he, like many other independent observers, describes as proxy war:

The Dirty War on Syria - Dr. Tim Anderson on GRTV
(Senator Xenophon, you should contact Dr Anderson. Why is he not interviewed on Australian TV?)

Also take on board what journalist Seymour Hersh wrote in his famous 2007 article 'The Redirection', appearing in The New Yorker, where he stated that "The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda."

In 2013 the former French Foreign Minister, Roland Dumas, appearing on national television, confirmed such a strategy when he stated that he was approached by British officials for his co-operation in organising a rebel intervention in Syria two years before violence erupted in the country:

Many years before this General Wesley Clark, speaking in 2003, said that Syria was on a target list of seven countries destined for regime change, according to plans devised in late 2001:

General Clark further stated in a Fox News interview in 2015 that "We use radical Islamists for foreign policy objectives", which echoes the strategy outlined by Seymour Hersh and the declassified DIA document:

While it is true that very occasional interviews on the ABC confirm the fact the extremists are the leading fighting groups in the country, and that regional powers and the West heavily support them (including ISIS), this information is seemingly consigned to oblivion. For example, veteran Middle East correspondent Robert Fisk twice on the Lateline program explained what was occurring and yet we saw no overall change in ABC's war reporting narrative:

Fisk: Syrian soldiers are fighting for their lives as well as their country (Broadcast: 10/11/2014)

Interview: Robert Fisk, the Independent newspaper's Middle East correspondent based in Beirut (Broadcast: 09/09/2015)

My issue with the mainstream media (including the ABC) is that rather consistently report on what really is happening, in order to hold our Governments and allies to account, they, for the most part, participate in spreading lies about the war.

Furthermore, it is hard to believe that PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS are making an unconscious choice here when considering the obvious nature of this extremist infested proxy war. How is it that we always hear about the alleged atrocities of the Syrian Government, and ISIS, but seldom anything about the other radical groups that are labelled as 'rebels and activists'? We are told that there are 'moderate' groups but actual research reveals this to be untrue. They are only moderate in the sense that they are less extreme.

Even more disturbing is the fact that there are blatant examples of the media concocting war escalating propaganda that promotes overt Western intervention against the secular Syrian Government - thereby assisting the US regime change strategy mentioned earlier by General Clark.

Perhaps the worst such example of war propaganda is the BBC's fake chemical weapons story from 2013, revealed in the following video, where they actually dubbed in fake audio so that the word "napalm" was replaced with "chemical weapon" at a time following the Ghouta chemical attack:

Media Lies While Syrians Die: Media Disinformation and the Syrian War

The other notable example of deliberate lying comes from the CNN 'Danny from Syria' news reports, that pushed the idea that the Syrian Government was indiscriminately attacking civilians:

Caught: Staged CNN Syria Interviews Faked By Activist Danny

Despite all these past exposés the ABC still airs reports that push the erroneous narrative that the Syrian Government is hell bent on targeting civilians. They are simply following US State Department talking points which are falsities. ABC journalists like Matt Brown, who have uncritically followed this line, even when they have direct access to what is happening on the ground, should know better.

Please hold the ABC to account for their phoney foreign affairs reporting when it comes to this matter. By allowing the false narrative to prevail, little pressure is placed on the West to cease their support for the extremist forces.



ps. The following is one of many previous letters I sent to the ABC, addressing the propaganda stories pushed about the War - addressing various massacres and chemical attacks that independent journalists (German) and UN investigators, found were conducted by opposition forces, plus other issues:

Correcting the Syrian War Narrative Aired on the Question and Answer Program: A Letter to Fact Check (ABC News Australia) - October 2015

Hello Fact Check,

Tony Jones on QandA said for viewers to send corrections or observations to your site in relation to his guests' comments regarding the War in Syria. Having already provided information challenging the mainstream narrative of this war in the past, I will do so again, this time addressing specific points of propaganda repeated by QandA guests along with (my usual) links to evidence that clearly shows the conflict in Syria is, and always has been, a Proxy War.

A few key assumptions aired on QandA need to be addressed (deconstructed).

QandA guests wrongly painted a picture of President Assad as being responsible for the conflict - that he was essentially a butcher of civilians whose only crime was wanting democratic reforms. This is a lie. The Assad Government, from the very beginning, faced a series of violent actions sponsored by regional powers including NATO (details appear below). And although many protesters were arrested, this crackdown was relatively weak. Violence coming amidst the protest movement, on the other hand, was, and is, overlooked - at least in the western media narrative.

The majority of protesters, in early 2011, wanted speeded-up democratic reforms as a result of the Arab Spring. The problem for the Assad Government was that these protests were hijacked at a very early stage by violent elements. The Syrian Government was actually trying to placate the situation, offering concessions that included ending the Emergency Law and offering municipal elections, efforts that were undermined by unidentified snipers who fired on both protesters AND police.

We were never shown evidence to prove who these gunmen were - it has only been assumed (via propagandistic claims) that they were part of the Syrian security services. However, years later, during the Maidan protests in Ukraine, third party snipers shot at both police and protesters, facilitating the ousting of the Yanukovych Government. In both instances these actions looked designed to foment conflict, fostering division, rather than simply oppressing the aspirations of one side.

The biggest overlooked issue from early 2011 is the fact that "armed gangs" really did hijack the democracy movement, killing police and soldiers in various incidents. A recent article appearing at Global Research provided a history of various incidents showing that what occurred did not simply constitute the suppression of peaceful protesters:

“Moderate Terrorists”. Deconstructing the NATO Narrative on Syria. “Leftists” Keep the Myth Alive:

Another fact is that the NATO base at Incirlik, a military facility, was confirmed as being an 'organising area' for opposition forces in Syria from at least May 2011

Juxtapose this with claims from people like General Wesley Clark, who stated in 2003, that Syria was on a target list of seven countries destined for regime change, according to plans devised in late 2001.

The journalist Seymour Hersh, in his famous 2007 article 'The Redirection', appearing in The New Yorker, confirmed what General Clark stated earlier writing that "The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda."

Then in 2013, the former French Foreign Minister, Roland Dumas, appearing on national television, stated that he was approached by British officials for his co-operation in organising a rebel intervention in Syria two years before violence erupted in the country.

In 2015 there appeared the declassified US Defence Intelligence Agency documents from Aug 2012, that admitted "the West, Gulf Countries and Turkey" were supporting 'Salafists, the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda in Iraq' (ISIS) in the war in Syria - following the same policy Hersh had outlined in his 2007 article.

The fact of the matter is that the Assad Government was fighting against external forces who were supporting violent elements intent on overthrowing the Government. There was nothing democratic about such the actions of these proxy-force sponsoring countries.

Returning to specific claims of the Syrian Government conducting massacres against civilians, notably in locations such as Homs and Houla. These incidents proved to be the work of the extremists, who had been committing all manner of atrocities during the early years of the conflict.

For instance, the Houla massacre of 2012 was shown, by the conservative German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, to be the work of the Free Syrian Army, where the civilian victims, who supported the Government, had been knifed to death.

In later massacres conducted in 2013 we again find that the rebels were responsible. The article 'Media Disinformation and Coverup of Atrocities Committed by US Sponsored Syria Rebels' goes into some detail -

In 2014 there appeared a story claiming that Assad had been conducting a 'Holocaust-like' program from 2011 to at least 2013. The source and analysis of the photographic evidence was sponsored by the Government of Qatar, a backer of extremist forces in the proxy war, and the photos do not conclusively prove the involvement of the Syrian Government.

On the other hand it can be proved that the rebel (extremist) side, for the most part, was terrorising people, and displacing them from their homes. Numerous reports from the victims back up this account. This narrative is confirmed by Irish Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Maguire who told of what she witnessed during a fact finding tour of refugee camps. A further review of the available online evidence reinforces this narrative.

It is only the western mainstream media, and our political leaders, via selective reporting and unsubstantiated claims, that are pushing the idea that the majority of people left because of the 'tyrannical Syrian Government'. What we find missing from numerous western TV stories that deal with Syrian refugees is the question: "what caused you to leave?" Such questions, are almost nowhere to be found, and the replies often buried under a mountain of 'anti-Assad' propaganda. 

Another critical point that must be remembered is that the Western media has a history of pushing gross misrepresentations (knowingly or otherwise) when it comes to war. Just consider the WMD fiasco in the lead up to the 2003 Iraq War.

In relation to deliberate media misrepresentations, concerning 'Assad's forces deliberately targeting civilians', we find the case of 'Danny from Syria' who was caught lying about various bombardments and the conditions in the country during 2012. (see Caught: Staged CNN Syria Interviews Faked By Activist Danny)

This incident, and the other distortions already covered so far, proves that the western media narrative concerning this conflict is a false one has probably never been corrected in the minds of many Syrian War observers, which would include the QandA guests.

Perhaps the biggest unaddressed albatross, when it comes to the vilification of the Syrian Government, is the claim that Assad used chemical weapons on his own people. Again, this is another lie. It is a transparent lie when we consider actual analysis of the various chemical weapons incidents, coming from the UN and other sources.

We know from the early chemical weapons attacks, before the August 2013 sarin incident in Ghouta, that the UN, via statements made by Carla Del Ponte, considered that the rebels had used chemical weapons in the war.

The telegraph reported in 2013 on the Khan al Assal chemical attacks in which Syrian soldiers were victims.

In relation to the infamous August 21st chemical attack on Ghouta we find - summarised in the article
'New Data Raise Further Doubt on Official View of August 21 Gas Attack in Syria'  - that the poison gas shell was fired from rebel held areas.

A later 2013 United Nations Syrian chemical weapons report pointed out that four previous sarin gas attacks targeted Syrian soldiers and civilians and not rebels thereby exposing the Washington rhetoric that 'Assad's forces' had been responsible.

Taking into account these false chemical weapons accusations, and the lies being pushed about various civilian massacres, one must also reconsider often repeated claims made about 'barrel bombing civilians'.

Nothing much is said when the US causes 'collateral damage' whilst it is engaged in bombing suspected terrorists. The same thing is occurring with barrel munitions used by the Syrian Army. There is no evidence to show they are deliberately targeting civilians any more that the United States does. Using large bombs to hit extremists that are holed up under cover in urban areas is a logical strategy. Simply bombing civilians does not make any sense.

Fact Check, the information I have relayed here is easily found. Journalists and researchers covering the war should be made aware of this material and the argument appearing in this essay.

Tony Jones, and other media presenters need to be adequately informed, so they can challenge their guests, to correct them when they are mistaken. Other guests, that are more knowledgeable about the true nature of the Proxy War - as opposed to the ill-informed parade of commentators that regularly appear - should appear on QandA in the interests of balance (at the very least!).

Didn't anyone at ABC understand the significance of journalist Robert Fisk statements (he was interviewed on Lateline) when he reported there were no significant moderate forces in the Syria, and that Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the US were aiding the extremists? He was talking about the proxy nature of the war. Here are links to the Lateline interviews: and

Here are some further points of evidence to consider that highlight the foreign, Nation State, involvement in the War and related propaganda:

1. General Wesley Clark: "We use radical Islamists for foreign policy objectives"

2. ISIS was given training in anti-tank weapons use by US, UK and French advisers according to Der Spiegel and The Guardian newspapers in early 2013.

3. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights is London based propaganda

4. German TV Report: How Turkey Arms and Sends Wahhabi Jihadists into Syria

5. German TV report on Trucks and Jihadist fighters crossing unhindered over the Turkish border

Here are two concise Summary videos concerning the war from leading alternative news sources:

Media Lies While Syrians Die: Media Disinformation and the Syrian War - video summary of various events and how the media has manipulated the public's perceptions

The Covert Origins of ISIS - another summary of the proxy war

Fact Check, please note that I have sent many letters to the ABC, over a number of years, highlighting evidence showing that the war is a proxy conflict, that the Syrian Government has been fighting proxy forces from the very beginning, and that this situation would likely not exist if not for outside intervention. Implicit in my letters is the problem with your overall 'Assad the tyrant' narrative. This time I have spelled out the exact issues with various points of 'evidence' (propaganda) that supports the assumption that 'Assad is killing his own people'.

As a mainstream media source you have the power to influence events. Please remember that by not reporting the truth about the conflict in Syria you help facilitate the ongoing proxy war. Change the narrative.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, October 1st, 2016.]

Russian Buk Missile Producer, Radar Producer Hold Presser on MH17

Russian arms producer Almaz-Antey is commenting on the investigation into the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 over Ukraine on July 17, 2014. The Boeing 777 was en route to Kuala Lumpur from Amsterdam when it came down. All 298 people on board, including 80 children and 15 crewmembers, were killed.

This presentation is a reaction to the Dutch Investigation findings that included discredited video of a BUK launcher moving in the area, and a dubious missile smoke trail picture. The Russian reaction is to look at the forensic evidence in association with the aircraft, and the radar data.

In terms of the damage done to MH17, the Russia experiments clearly show a very large blast pattern with fragments flying though and out the other side of the airliner. This was not seen in the wreckage. It is not easily accounted for by claiming the missile had exploded at an angle that prevented penetrations. The small blast area on MH17 is indicative of a smaller warhead, which may have been caused by an air-to-air missile strike.

We still have the problem of witnesses who saw military aircraft in the area before and after the airliner was shot down, something that the Ukrainian authorities deny, and the fact that an earlier presentation from the Russian military stated that their radar detected a fighter sized target rising to within 5 kilometres of MH17.

What is puzzling is that the new presentation put out by the Russians concerning the radar images now says they could not detect a missile coming at MH17 from the east. There are also no fighter sized targets near the aircraft either. It is worth considering the following clipped text:
The latest Russian claim is that the radar images - which highlight the MH17 route and other passenger aircraft - show no sign of a missile fired from the ground in rebel-held Snizhne directed at the Boeing.

Such missiles are five metres in length, and it would have shown on the radar screen, say Russian experts who unveiled the details at a Defence Ministry briefing in Moscow.

Expert Viktor Mesheryakov said: "'The radar did not register any alien flying objects close to the Malaysian plane, apart from two (other) civilian aircraft."

Andrey Koban, an army commander and military radar specialist, said: "It is possible to say all the confidence that in the time before the Boeing crash, no objects approached it from the eastern side, including from Snizhne village."

He insisted: "If the Malaysian Boeing was hit by a missile launched from any area located east of the crash site, it would have been detected by Russia's primary radar."

The Russians went on to say that a missile launched from Zaroshenskoe village - where Ukrainian military troops were based - may not have shown on the Russian radar for what were explained as complicated scientific reasons.

But there are significant problems with the Russian claims which were given prominent airtime on the country's leading state-run TV channel.

Pro-Kremlin Igor Korotchenko, editor of National Defence magazine, claimed Russia had released a game-changer by supplying "primary information" which should be considered by Dutch investigators.

He said: "It is impossible to forge it, or manipulate it in any other way."

Yet it is not clear why Russia needed 26 months to release this key data, and has only done so on the eve of the announcement from Dutch investigators.

Nor why the radar imagery shows a tiny Russian drone flying close to the Ukrainian border, but does not indicate the Kiev missile - almost three times the size - that Moscow allege shot down the plane.

The new radar details also destroy an earlier Moscow claim that a mysterious Ukrainian warplane was in the sky at the time the plane was shot down.

The radar shows no such plane.

One Western expert said the Russian images could be genuine and suggested the radar may not have had the technical sophistication to pick up the BUK missile.

But Moscow also challenged Ukraine to release its own radar details at the time of the crash which, it claimed, have been suppressed.
The US also has satellite images of the area at the time of the incident but has not released this information either. US satellites would have shown the BUK launchers on the ground and the smoke trails, just as they showed Russian aircraft deployed in Syria.

What we have is three countries, Russia, Ukraine, and the USA, not fully releasing their data on what happened. The only caveat to this is that a BUK missile fired from the Ukrainian side may have somehow avoided Russian radar detection (although this seems unlikely). What is missing is clear evidence of BUK missile smoke trails in the area (see below) plus the damage on MH17 is inconsistent with a large warhead.

The fact that the US and Ukrainians have been withholding vital information, have been fabricating evidence (the videos of the BUK launcher), and that MH17 was directed over the war zone by air traffic control all points toward their guilt (guilty demeanour).

Here is an actual BUK missile launch, not the computer generated obfuscation offered by the Dutch investigation:

It also worth considering the following video presentation that postulates that a MIG-29 was used to shoot down MH17 using an R-27 missile. The missile has enough range that it could target a high flying airliner from a relatively low altitude, below possible detection heights. The host of the video makes one erroneous claim where he says that a BUK system has a very low probability of downing an airliner. The video also features (alleged) witnesses to the incident who saw Ukrainian jets on the day, at the time of the attack.

Related Info:

MH17 investigation results released - RT America

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, October 1st, 2016.]

What Is a Globalist?

Lauren Southern of explains the real meaning behind the word we're hearing in every political debate, from Brexit to the US election.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, October 1st, 2016.]

SR 1223 – Hillary Clinton Gets Away With Everything! Perjury, Bribery

There are 2 candidates for president, but only Hillary Clinton:
- Was caught lying to Congress
- Was fired from a job for being unethical
- Deleted 33,000 emails after she was ordered to give them to the FBI.
- Had that same computer Bleached to remove any traces of criminal activity
- Got the rapist of a 12-year-old girl off and then laughed about it ...


SR 1224 – The Fix Was In. How Hillary Clinton Avoided Prosecution by the FBI.

(The head of the FBI needs to be arrested, for obstructing justice.)

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, October 1st, 2016.]

Keiser Report (E973): Invasion of Debt Snatchers

In this episode of the Keiser Report Max and Stacy discuss the Invasion of the debt snatchers as tech gets leveraged and mobile phone bills get collateralized. In the second half Max and Stacy continue their conversation with Karl Gray (@paradimeshift) about the cryptocurrency and blockchain investment space.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, October 1st, 2016.]

Friday, 30 September 2016

What's REALLY Happening in Syria - Syrian Girl

The U.S. is HELPING ISIS and moving closer to war with Russia.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 30th, 2016.]

Lawsuits Against the Neocons: Hillary's DNC, George W. Bush Et Al

The neocon war hawks have embroiled the United States in illegal wars of aggression around the globe, and with the possibility of a Clinton presidency, that reign of terror looks set to continue. But a series of lawsuits are challenging the neocons in the courts and threatening to derail that agenda. This is the GRTV Backgrounder on Global Research TV.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 30th, 2016.]

CNN Post Debate Polls Rigged? Michael Rivero

US using Nazi like slave prison labour, BLM issues, wikileaks and more Clinton revelations, fake reports about recent use of ISIS chemical weapons, the US prison industrial complex and failing economy, Fukushima update. Guest's website:

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 30th, 2016.]

Washington Tries to Break BRICS – Rape of Brazil Begins

Washington’s regime change machinery has for the time being succeeded in removing an important link in the alliance of large emerging nations by railroading through a Senate impeachment of the duly elected President, Dilma Rousseff. On August 31 her Vice President Michel Temer was sworn in as President. In his first speech as president, the cynical Temer called for a government of “national salvation,” asking for the trust of the Brazilian people. He indicated plans to reform, and has also signaled his intention to overhaul the pension system and labor laws, and cut public spending, all themes beloved of Wall Street banks, of the International Monetary Fund and their Washington Consensus. Now after less than three weeks at the job, Temer has unveiled plans for wholesale privatization of Brazil’s crown jewels, starting with oil. The planned Wall Street rape of Brazil is about to begin.

It’s important to keep in mind that elected President Rousseff was not convicted or even formally charged with any concrete act of corruption, even though the pro-oligarchy mainstream Brazil media, led by O’Globo Group of the billionaire Roberto Irineu Marinho, ran a media defamation campaign creating the basis to railroad Rousseff into formal impeachment before the Senate. The shift took place after the opposition PMDB party of Temer on March 29 broke their coalition with Rousseff’s Workers’ Party, as accusations of Petrobras-linked corruption were made against Rousseff and former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

On August 31, 61 Senators voted to remove her while 20 voted against removal. The formal charge was “manipulation of the state budget” before the 2014 elections to hide the size of the deficit. She vehemently denies the charge. Indeed, the Senate issued its own expert report that concluded there was “no indication of direct or indirect action by Dilma” in any illegal budgetary maneuvers. According to the Associated Press, “Independent auditors hired by Brazil’s Senate said in a report released Monday that suspended President Dilma Rousseff didn’t engage in the creative accounting she was charged with at her impeachment trial.” Under an honest system that would have ended the impeachment then and there. Not in Brazil.

In effect, she was impeached for the dramatic decline in the Brazilian economy, a decline deliberately pushed along as US credit rating agencies downgraded Brazilian debt, and international and mainstream Brazilian media kept the Petrobras corruption allegations in the spotlight. Importantly, the Senate did not ban her from office for 8 years as Washington had hoped, and she has promised an electoral return. The Washington-steered Temer has until end of 2018 to deliver Brazil to Temer’s foreign masters before his term legally ends.

Notably, Temer himself was accused of corruption in the Petrobras state oil company investigations. He reportedly asked the then-head of the transportation unit of Petróleo Brasileiro SA in 2012 to arrange illegal campaign contributions to Temer’s party which was running a Washington-backed campaign to oust Rousseff’s Workers’ Party. Then this June, only days into his serving as acting president, two of Temer’s own chosen ministers, including the Minister of Transparency, were forced to resign in response to allegations that they sought to subvert the probe into massive graft at Petrobras.

One of the two, Temer’s extremely close ally Romero Jucá, was caught on tape plotting Dilma’s impeachment as a way to shut down the ongoing Petrobras corruption investigation, as well as indicating that Brazil’s military, the media, and the courts were all participants in the impeachment plotting.

In brief, the removal of Dilma Rousseff and her Workers’ Party after 13 years in Brazil’s leadership was a new form of Color Revolution from Washington, one we might call a judicial coup by corrupt judges and congressmen. Of the 594 members of the Congress, as the Toronto Globe and Mail reported, “318 are under investigation or face charges” while their target, President Rousseff, “herself faces no allegation of financial impropriety.”

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 30th, 2016.]

Asylum Crisis in Sweden: Number of 'No-Go Zones' Rises, Police Lose Control

The inflow of asylum seekers in Sweden, a country with one of the most liberal laws towards refugees, is putting an increasing strain on the country's police. There are now reportedly 55 areas in the country, where the law is not fully upheld.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 30th, 2016.]

SR 1221 – Beth: How Could Any Woman Vote for Crooked Hillary Clinton?

Beth: How Could Any Woman Vote for Crooked Hillary Clinton?
Beth says that Crooked Hillary is all about money.

Related Info:

Debate Check: 12 Hillary Lies Debunked

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 30th, 2016.]

Keiser Report (E972): Houdini's Magic Tricks in Modern Economy & Politics

In this episode of the Keiser Report, Max and Stacy discuss what Houdini could teach us about the modern economy and politics, from the totally fake vanishing acts like the Libor charity funds in the UK to the very real entertaining extravaganzas like the Trump campaign. In the second half, Max and Stacy talk to Karl Gray (@paradimeshift) about his investments in Aid:Tech and how the blockchain is actually being deployed in the real world to solve transparency issues.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 30th, 2016.]

Thursday, 29 September 2016

'Americans Know Their Weapons Will End Up in Hands of Terrorists' - Al-Nusra Commander Interviewer

US weapons are being delivered to Al-Nusra Front by governments that Washington supports, a militant commander has told German media. RT discusses the interview with Jürgen Todenhöfer, the journalist who spoke to the Al-Nusra commander.

The Al Nusra commander stated that the US, Saudis and Israelis have trained extremists to fight against the Syrian Government - something the journalist Todenhöfer underlines when he says Western support for terrorist groups is well understood by those closely following the conflict.

The Proxy War in Syria is a War Crime. We require a criminal investigation into those sponsoring the illegal war in order to stop the bloodbath. Arresting the head of the CIA would be a good first move.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 29th, 2016.]

'Just Wait…' Islamic State Reveals it Has Smuggled THOUSANDS of Extremists into Europe

The Syrian operative claimed more than 4,000 covert ISIS gunmen had been smuggled into western nations – hidden amongst innocent refugees.

The ISIS smuggler, who is in his thirties and is described as having a trimmed jet-black beard, revealed the ongoing clandestine operation is a complete success.

"Just wait," he smiled.

The Islamic State operative spoke exclusively to BuzzFeed on the condition of anonymity and is believed to be the first to confirm plans to infiltrate western countries.

Islamic State, also referred to as IS and ISIS, is believed to be actively smuggling deadly gunmen across the sparsely-guarded 565-mile Turkish border and on to richer European nations, he revealed.

They are following the well-trodden route taken by refugees and migrants fleeing, travelling across the border of Turkey then on boats across to Greece and through Europe.

There are now more than 4,000 covert ISIS gunmen "ready" across the European Union, he claimed.
The operative said the undercover infiltration was the beginning of a larger plot to carry out revenge attacks in the West in retaliation for the US-led coalition airstrikes.

He said: "If someone attacks me then for sure I will attack them back."

Islamic State extremists are taking advantage of developed nations' generosity towards refugees to infiltrate Europe, he said.

Uncontrolled immigration is a bad idea, just as Western support for opposition (extremist) forces in Syria and Libya. The West has brought this situation upon itself.

Unfortunately the general population is largely unaware of what is happening in terms of State support for terrorists and have bought into 'feel good' refugee memes whilst almost completely ignoring security concerns.

Only when thousands of Europeans are gunned down or blown up, or sniped, by ISIS insurgents operating in Europe will they realise they need to pay more attention to world events and the role of their Governments in such affairs.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 29th, 2016.]

Data Shows No Aerial Objects Approached MH17 from the East - Russian MoD

There are new details on the fate of the MH17 passenger jet accident, after Russia's Defence Ministry released radar data from the day of 2014 tragedy in Eastern Ukraine. According to the military, there's no evidence of a missile being fired at the plane from the territory controlled by anti-government forces.

This radar data is curious since it does not reveal evidence of a missile, where we have physical evidence from the crash site that shows the aircraft was hit by fragments from an explosive warhead.

The headline points out that no aerial objects approached the aircraft from the east. However, it says nothing about aerial objects approaching from other directions.

It is odd that there also no indications of other aircraft on this recording since multiple witnesses at the crash site reported seeing 'military jets' shortly after the wreckage came down - as reported by BBC Russia and denied by the Ukrainian Government.

A previous post on this site fully explored the evidence and concluded that the most likely scenario was that MH17 was shot down by an air-to-air missile:

Russian Arms Manufacturer Almaz-Antey Delivers MH17 Report [ft. Analysis and Observations]

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 29th, 2016.]

Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton | Presidential Debate Analysis - Stefan Molyneux

On September 26th, 2016, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton participated in the first Presidential debate between the Republican and Democratic candidates - moderated by Lester Holt.

You many not agree with every single point raised by Molyneux but the vast majority of what is raised in this discussion is accurate. People have pointed out that the moderator asked Trump for details, and did not ask the same of Hillary ...

It is undeniably true that almost all the negative accusations made against Trump are false.

The clip above mentions the series The Untruth About Trump and his opposition to the Iraq War. The beginning of the following 'Untruth Video' features his interview on the Howard Stern Show where he does NOT give a rousing endorsement of attacking Iraq on the first anniversary of 911. He never endorsed attacking Iraq before the invasion, and even said publicly that the US economy was more important than attacking Iraq. Privately, Trump was against the war - according to Hannity - but, as a public figure, saying so too robustly in the climate after 911 would have likely jeopardised his business dealings. However, right after the invasion occurred he came out strongly against it, even when the war was still relatively popular:

Even More Untruth About Donald Trump

Related Info:

Link: Five Times Lester Holt Shilled for Hillary Clinton at First Debate

Link: Priebus - Hillary Remembers Every Word Trump's Ever Said, But "Couldn't Remember" Anything With FBI

Video: Did Hillary wear a earpiece at Debate (Did she Cheat Again?)

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 29th, 2016.]

DEBUNKED: Trump is Hitler? Why HILLARY is More Like The Führer...

You've heard it a hundred times: "TRUMP IS LITERALLY HITLER!" But when you look past the click-bait rhetoric and compare actual policies, it's obvious the Hillary has far more similarities to the Führer...

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 29th, 2016.]

Record Ice Gain in Arctic & More Early Snows Across Northern Hemisphere

The satellite record as the IPCC would love you to believe is the entire history of Earth, not at all but, Arctic Sea Ice has gained the most ice since the satellite era began. Adding 800,000 sq km of ice in just weeks. In addition to record cold and early snows from Thailand to Turkey.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 29th, 2016.]