CBC's The Fifth Estate: The Unofficial Story of 9/11

Canadian public television broadcaster CBC aired this fair and balanced documentary on November 27th, 2009. The original video is available below and on the Fifth Estate’s website at www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story. Exclusive web interviews are also available on the CBC website. We also encourage you to visit the website to leave your comments.

In this documentary, CBC reporter Bob McKeown interviews several 9/11 activists:
http://world911truth.org/the-fifth-estate-the-unofficial-story-of-911/






Notice the debunkers' misleading comments in this doco ! It's a pity the show didn't call them out for pushing such junk rhetoric. There's other issues I have with the show, like construing proven 911 truth evidence with other non-issues like the Moon Landings or requiring the truth investigators to entirely solve the crime. Otherwise the Canadians did a fairly good job in drawing awareness to some of the key people in the 911 truth movement. I like the appearance of the Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth banner near the end of the program. Great advertising indeed. By simply airing the issue, many people will go online and discover for themselves who is telling the truth.

(I'd like to see an hour long documentary that goes after the debunkers themselves. That would really be worth watching !)

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, December 2nd, 2009.]

Three Things You Absolutely Must Know About Climategate

This may seem obscure, but the science involved is being used to justify the diversion of literally trillions of dollars of the world’s wealth in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by phasing out fossil fuels. The CRU is the Pentagon of global warming science, and these documents are its Pentagon Papers.

Here are three things everyone should know about the Climategate Papers. Links are provided so that the full context of every quote can be seen by anyone interested.

First, the scientists discuss manipulating data to get their preferred results. The most prominently featured scientists are paleoclimatologists, who reconstruct historical temperatures and who were responsible for a series of reconstructions that seemed to show a sharp rise in temperatures well above historical variation in recent decades.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/three-things-you-absolutely-must-know-about-climategate/

I think the most useful comment appears at the end of this article:

So what does this all mean? It does not mean that there is no warming trend or that mankind has not been responsible for at least some of the warming. To claim that as result of these documents is clearly a step too far. However, it is clear that at least one branch of climate science — paleoclimatology — has become hopelessly politicized to the point of engaging in unethical and possibly illegal behavior.

The serious problem we face is that the correlation between the warming of the earth and CO2 is not so apparent. That humans are significantly contributing to global warming IS debatable. It is very likely that the sun is the main cause of warming and cooling. Having said that, I am against pollution, so I favour promoting clean technology.

I'm also against heavy taxation. New technology will simply replace the old. The taxation is an unnecessary burden. Some very rich individuals will be making a lot of money out of the taxation side of the equation here (ie. it's a scam).

[Posted at the SPOOKYWEATHER blog, December 2nd, 2009.]

Tarpley: Butcher Barky And His Afghan Adventures

A brief rundown of the present situation in Afghanistan plus lots of info on upcoming antiwar protests.

Note the pictures of US troops and the opium poppies. You can bet that the Karzai Government, and the CIA, are up to their eyeballs in this drugs trade.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, December 2nd, 2009.]

Iraq Inquiry Bombshell: Secret Letter to Reveal New Blair War Lies

An explosive secret letter that exposes how Tony Blair lied over the legality of the Iraq War can be revealed.

The Chilcot Inquiry into the war will interrogate the former Prime Minister over the devastating 'smoking gun' memo, which warned him in the starkest terms the war was illegal.

The Mail on Sunday can disclose that Attorney General Lord Goldsmith wrote the letter to Mr Blair in July 2002 - a full eight months before the war - telling him that deposing Saddam Hussein was a blatant breach of international law.

It was intended to make Mr Blair call off the invasion, but he ignored it. Instead, a panicking Mr Blair issued instructions to gag Lord Goldsmith, banned him from attending Cabinet meetings and ordered a cover-up to stop the public finding out.
http://uruknet.com/index.php?p=m60597&hd=&size=1&l=e

An international arrest warrant should be put out for the capture of Mr Tony Blair (et al) for War Crimes against the people of Iraq.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, December 1st, 2009.]

Obama Never Considered Diplomacy In Afghanistan

After initially injecting 21,000 troops into Afghanistan allegedly to stave off imminent defeat, President Obama Tuesday will tell war-weary Americans why he seeks 35,000 more. If he gets them, the U.S. force there will exceed 100,000.

Washington has been pressuring its NATO allies to pour in more fighters even though European publics' don't want any part of it. The New York Times reported Nov. 25th the U.S. is asking NATO for 10,000 more troops above the 45,000 already in place. That could bring total Allied forces to about 150,000. Toss in 70,000 private contractors and the total force soars to over 200,000. Yes, Afghanistan is shaping up as another Viet Nam.

Obama apparently never seriously considered ending the war diplomatically. Recall his blustering campaign rhetoric about defeating the Taliban; recall the public commitment last December of Defense Secretary Robert Gates to strengthen military bases in Afghanistan. Gates was the Bush official Obama continued in office.

Even as polls show a majority of Americans want U.S. forces out of Afghanistan and that Americans do not believe the war is worth fighting, President Obama---a former editor at the CIA front Business International Corporation in 1983-84---embraces a position in line with the long-held CIA view the U.S. must control the Middle East's energy resources. It was the CIA that overthrew Iran in 1953 after Tehran nationalized its oil production, depriving British Petroleum of its lucrative swindle. Afghanistan is valued today for the oil and gas pipelines the U.S. wants built there, no matter what other reasons Obama gives.
http://uruknet.com/index.php?p=m60576&hd=&size=1&l=e

Remember that 911 was an inside job- no one should have been sent to Afghanistan in the first place.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, December 1st, 2009.]

Osama Bin Laden is DEAD.

Bin Laden has been dead for years. Every video and audio tape from and including the "fat Bin Laden confession" onwards have been fakes. Bin Laden had nothing to do with the attacks of September 11 (see links below)

The 2001 Bin Laden Confession tape is a Fake.

The Real Bin Laden Denied Involvement in the Attacks.

The 2004 Bin Laden Threat tape is a Fake.

Experts Agree: Bin Laden tapes are Fakes.

The Real Bin Laden Died in Late 2001 or Early 2002.

The 911 attacks were an Inside Job.

In the propaganda war Osama Bin Laden is a useful tool for keeping people quiet about the truth behind 911 and to limit dissent regarding the military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Afterall, we are told that Bin Laden confessed to 911 and that we are fighting against fanatics who initiated the conflict.

Exposing the truth about the September 11 attacks will destroy this deception and end the costly wars in the Middle East. It is vitally important that we promote the facts and science proving that 911 was an Inside job.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, December 1st, 2009.]

Debunking the Debunkers - the Blog !

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/

This brilliant site destroys the fake science and claims made by the 911 debunking fraternity. I highly recommend that everyone visit the blog in order to get some basic scientific principles set in mind. It is level-headed analysis at its best.

Also, their selection of links to other 911 truth webpages and resources is invaluable.

For activists wishing to present a deconstruction of the main debunker falsehoods, thereby exposing the official lies, I suggest drawing upon the information found at sites like Debunking the Debunkers. Encourage others to learn the truth and fight in the information war.

With continuous and unrelenting actions will we inevitably expose the 911 false flag attack for what it was. We can then bring about a measure of justice for all the victims of 911 and END the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Peace.

Spookypunkos.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 30th, 2009.]

RECAP: 911 BREAKTHROUGH INFORMATION: Activist Kevin Ryan on the Prime Suspects in the WTC Mass Murders, Nanothermites, and How The Towers Were Rigged.

Alex Jones talks with Kevin Ryan about the latest research on the collapse of the WTC buildings showing that highly specialised nanothermites were used. Because very few people had access to this sort technology the list of suspects in the crime is short.

There is information here about the three way connection between the people with knowledge of these high tech incendiary explosives, those involved in the WTC fireproofing upgrades and those involved in the NIST investigations ... all the same people ... or at least many of the same. The interview reveals some prime suspects to the crime and how they may have carried out the demolition.

I would wager that a couple of highly protected Grand Juries could cause a lot of trouble for the perpetrators with the information aired here.


Part 1 (10:52)


Part 2 (10:56)


Part 3 (10:59)


Part 4 (8:22)

A must see/hear interview !!

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 30th, 2009.]

The World Trade Centre Explosions (9/11/2001)

(7:30)

From Loose Change: Final Cut.

Very obviously there were massive secondary explosions occurring throughout the World Trade Centre buildings- in the lower levels, in the basement, the lobby and subway areas- far way from the fire zones. These explosions were not insignificant, indicating they were the likely result of pre-planted devices. From eyewitness testimony alone one would have to conclude that the fires and aircraft impacts would have been able to cause these effects.

Even more damning are the reports of explosions in WTC 7, before the Twin Towers came down. There is no reasonable explanation to account for the testimony of WTC 7 survivor Barry Jennings other than to conclude that bombs had been planted inside this structure.

The final proof that explosives were present is the forensic evidence of Molten Steel and Thermate found at the WTC disaster site- phenomena that simply cannot exist without the use of incendiary type explosives.

911 WAS an Inside Job. Tell everyone so that this information becomes public knowledge. When EVERYONE KNOWS the perpetrators will be unable to hide from the inevitable public investigations.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 30th, 2009.]

RECAP: HIGH TECH EXPLOSIVES FOUND IN WORLD TRADE CENTRE DUST

(10:31)

This interview is with the first author of the scientific paper dealing with the unreacted explosives found in the World Trade Centre Dust- Professor Niels Harrit.

The forensic evidence, to which he refers, further proves that high tech explosive devices were used to bring down the three WTC skyscrapers on 911. This paper adds to the physical evidence we already have of the superheated steel, the heat corroded condition of various steel beams, the physical characteristics of the collapses themselves, and the iron-rich thermite byproducts that have been identified so far.

In response to a question raised in the clip as to how 10-100 tons of explosive could have been moved into the building:

1. We know the building security had been compromised using a company associated with the Bush family.

2. We know there were "upgrades" or "repairs" to fireproofing and the elevators in the months before the attacks giving ample opportunity to thoroughly rig the buildings.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 30th, 2009.]

911 BREAKTHROUGH: Richard Gage AIA on New Zealand National Television

Richard Gage AIA appeared on New Zealand's government owned television station, TVNZ, on 27 November 2009.

In this interview on the "Close Up" program, Gage lays out the overwhelming evidence for controlled demolition of 3 WTC office towers on 11 September 2009.

This may be the first time the evidence assembled by Gage and others in the 9/11 truth movement has been presented with the gravity and respect it deserves by any mainstream news broadcaster.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 29th, 2009.]

Washington's Blog: Instead of creating jobs for American, Obama spends in Afghanistan, Iraq

America is in the most severe unemployment crisis since - and perhaps including - the Great Depression.

And yet Obama, like Bush, has done virtually nothing to create more jobs. Instead, they both gave trillions to the biggest banks (who are not loaning it out to the little guy) and for waging wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-25059-Nonpartisan-Examiner~y2009m11d27-Washingtons-Blog-Instead-of-creating-jobs-for-American-Obama-spends-in-Afghanistan-Iraq

The rest of the article details that the costly war in Iraq has been completely unnecessary- that it was sold on a lie. Please check out the full story.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 29th, 2009.]

A Conspiracy that Isn't - The True Story Of The Philadelphia Experiment

The rumors have persisted for over fifty years. They have all the trappings of fiction, yet there are those who persist on believing that the U.S. Navy actually rendered a warship invisible and teleported it to and from the Philadelphia Naval Yards in a top-secret project. THE TRUE STORY OF THE PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT chronicles the origins and spread of this tallest of all sailor's tall tales, revealing how research into antisubmarine technology likely provided the catalyst for the accounts and documenting stages in the story's development in the pages of pulp fiction.


(42:55)

Although this story appeals to me personally, perhaps more as a work of science-fiction, there's no evidence to suggest it is true. The whole matter of a disappearing warship appears to have developed from a tall tale told in connection with degaussing operations - a procedure used to demagnetise steel to make warships "invisible" to magnetic mines.

This case should be considered as a great example where the facts and science are foremost in evaluating the situation: AS THEY SHOULD BE EVERY TIME. It's also a case in point highlighting that those people, who point out that 911 MUST BE an inside job, do so because the evidence dictates it, rather than from any unsubstantiated "belief".

The fact remains that most highly credentialed people (Academics, Engineers, scientists etc), who have come to accept that 911 was an inside job have done so because the material evidence has left little choice- NOT because these people are prone to believing in myths. Rather than the research revealing the OFFICIAL story about 911 is true, the research shows clearly that the goverment account is a LIE.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 29th, 2009.]

AE911Truth New Zealand Tour Expanded!

By popular demand, three cities have been added to the New Zealand tour. Christchurch and Auckland have been scheduled and Hamilton is pending TBA.

For more information, check our Australasia/Japan Tour page and our Speaking Engagements and Appearances pages.
http://www.ae911truth.org/info/120

Mr Gage is making great progress here. One country at a time. The truth will out.

The key thing to remember about the movement is that the more people we get the more advocates we get. Obviously some people will do more than others. However, the point is for everyone to keep pushing the message so that we can pick up more highly respected architects, scientists, academics and other people who can make a strong case in the public spotlight.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 28th, 2009.]

Fossils of Martian Bugs Found on Meteorite that Landed on Earth 13,000 Years Ago

New evidence has made it more likely that remnants of Martian microbes were transported to Earth in a meteorite, it was revealed today.

A study by scientists from the American space agency Nasa has found chemical signatures in the rock strongly associated with life.

The discovery strengthens the case for believing that worm-like structures in the meteorite are 'microfossils' of ancient Martian bugs.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1231052/Fossilised-remains-Martians-meteorite-landed-Earth-13-000-years-ago.html

This is the same rock they looked at in 1996. This time new technology indicates a much stronger possibility that the fossil features are likely to be from microbes.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 28th, 2009.]

CBS Reporter Blows the Lid Off the Swine Flu Media Hype and Hysteria

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 27th, 2009.]

RECAP: The Mysterious Collapse of WTC Seven: Why NIST’s Final 9/11 Report is Unscientific and False

Scientists, presupposing the regularity of nature, operate on the principle that like effects generally imply like causes. Scientists are, therefore, loathe to posit unprecedented causes for common phenomena. By 9/11, the collapse of steel-framed high-rises had become a rather common phenomenon, which most Americans had seen on television. And in every one of these cases, the building had been brought down by explosives in the process known as controlled demolition. From a scientific perspective, therefore, the obvious assumption would have been that WTC 7 came down because explosives had been used to remove its steel supports.

However, the public discussion of the destruction of the World Trade Center did not occur in a scientific context, but in a highly charged political context. America had just been attacked, it was almost universally believed, by foreign terrorists who had flown hijacked planes into the Twin Towers, and in response the Bush administration had launched a “war on terror.” The idea that even one of the buildings had been brought down by explosives would have implied that the attacks had not been a surprise, so this idea could not be entertained by many minds in private, let alone in public.
-------------------------------------------------
No Girder Shear Studs: NIST’s explanation as to how fire caused Building 7 to collapse starts with thermal expansion, meaning that the fire heated up the steel, thereby causing it to expand.

A steel beam on the 13th floor, NIST claims, caused a steel girder attached to Column 79 to break loose. Having lost its support, Column 79 failed, and this failure started a chain reaction, in which all 82 of the building’s steel columns failed. [51]

Without getting into the question of whether this is even remotely plausible, let us just focus on the question: Why did that girder fail?

It failed, NIST said, because it was not connected to the floor slab with sheer studs. NIST wrote:

In WTC 7, no studs were installed on the girders. Floor beams . . . had shear studs, but the girders that supported the floor beams did not have shear studs.

This point was crucial to NIST’s answer to a commonly asked question: Why did fire cause WTC 7 to collapse, when fire had never before brought down steel-framed high-rise buildings, some of which had had much bigger and longer-lasting fires? NIST’s answer was: differences in design.

One of those crucial differences, NIST stated repeatedly, was “the absence of [girder] shear studs that would have provided lateral restraint.”

But this was a fabrication on NIST’s part. How can we know this? All we need to do is to look at NIST’s Interim Report on WTC 7, which it had published back in 2004, before it had developed its theory of girder failure.

This report stated that girders as well as the beams had been attached to the floor by means of shear studs. [52]

We have here as clear a case of fabrication as one will see, with NIST simply making up a fact in order to meet the needs of its new theory.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=GRI20090914&articleId=15201

The entire NIST investigation appears to be a deliberate attempt to avoid looking at the specific evidence showing WTC7 was explosively demolished. Apart from this avoidance they also provided an obviously false story about how fire alone could have brought down the building. In doing so they blatantly lied about a number of things.

NIST appears to be acting as an accessory after the fact in an act of Treason. The prima facie evidence clearly shows 911 was an inside job and yet NIST looks to be deliberately obfuscating the data.

There is the crime of misprision of treason- the failure to report Treason to the relevant authorities. The penalties for such a crime is seven years jail, a fine or both. Because 911 is such a great crime I would expect any judge to recommend the maximum possible sentence.

(I have reposted this story in light of an article put up to counter news that high profile Architect Jan Utzon has signed with the Architechs and Engineers for 911 Truth. The mainstream media likes to imply that there no problems with the NIST investigation into the World Trade Centre collapses !)

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 27th, 2009.]

Some thoughts About Climategate and Greenland

I'm trying to get a handle this climate (change) data scandal:

AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING: We know from the hacked emails that the scientists at the Hadley Climate Research Unit, led by Dr Phil Jones, have been cooking the books on the data. I know that this information is used by the UN and has been taken up widely by Governments and other researchers.

AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING: We know that the climate data from the Mauna Loa Observatory is highly questionable. The Carbon Dioxide data is taken from an area where there is an active volcano. CO2 and H2O are expelled into the atmosphere during eruptions.

FOR: I know that in the northern and southern polar regions we have seen loss of ice from the glaciers into the sea.

AGAINST: We know Greenland was much more warm in the past. There were Viking settlements there. If the world warmed so much at that time why didn't we see a catastrophic increase in sea levels such as Al Gore predicts in his Inconvenient Truth film ? Perhaps the earth would need to become a LOT more warm to cause enough melting to raise the sea levels ?

FOR GLOBAL WARMING: This is not so much in support of "carbon reduction" but rather an acknowledgement that we need a reduction in pollution. I am 100% for clean technology so we don't have smog plus other contaminants in the air.

NOTE: I'll add to this list as more information comes to my attention. Thus far I am waiting for credible reviews of other sources of climate data. Presently, I smell a rat. I am very concerned about the crushing, and possibly unnecessary "carbon taxation" that is planned.

By SpookyP

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 27th, 2009.]

Tony Blair ‘was told 10 days before Iraq invasion that Saddam had dismantled WMD’

The full extent of how Tony Blair misled the public about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction before and after the Iraq War was laid bare yesterday.

The Chilcot Inquiry heard that just ten days before the invasion of Iraq Mr Blair was told Saddam had no way of using weapons of mass destruction.

And weapons experts revealed that the former Prime Minister took Britain to war based on intelligence that his own spies rated just 'four out of ten' for accuracy.

On the eve of the conflict, intelligence chiefs told Mr Blair that the Iraqi dictator had no warheads capable of delivering chemical weapons, dramatically undermining the Prime Minister's case for war.

Yet Mr Blair gave the go-ahead for the invasion despite strong evidence that Iraq was no threat to Britain.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1230824/Iraq-fourth-WMD-risk-list-inquiry-hears.html

It was known a long time before 10 days prior that Saddam did not pose a threat. From documents like the Downing Street memos, the "dodgy dossier" and the Oct 2002 NIE we can see that the war was purposely sold on unsubstantiated propaganda.

War Crimes have been committed and this matter needs to be forwarded to a criminal court. Thousands have died because of these lies.

If these lies destroyed your country, and the criminals walked away without punishment, could you stand by and do nothing ? Some level of punishment is in order. The criminals must be held accountable.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 26th, 2009.]

ClimateGate Explained on Glen Beck

Whether or not you like Glen Beck is beside the point here. His summary of the Climategate scandal is accurate and easy to comprehend in this video.

I have read elsewhere that even if the information here appears to have been manipulated then that does not invalidate all the other data indicating climate change. This is true, but this then begs the question as to how much of the remaining climate science has been based upon the information being produced at this centre ? What does the raw data from separate studies honestly indicate ? I know the UN uses much of this climategate material in their reports, so there is obviously a huge problem with regard to what we have been told in this respect.

More investigations into the climate science community, as a political entity, is required. Moreover, we must also consider the role that the sun plays in the warming or cooling of the Earth.

Having said all that I am 100% FOR having clean fuel technology: I don't like pollution and seeing the destruction of the present environment.

My concern with the natural environment is that it's the end result of millions of years of evolution. To get back to this level of diversity will take a long time. It's a good idea to hang onto what we have for the sake of science.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 26th, 2009.]