Wednesday, 23 November 2011

The JFK Assassination: The Core PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, simply explained, showing that the Official Account is a LIE [UPDATED]

The physical evidence in relation to the assassination confirms that Lee Harvey Oswald could not have been the lone gunman in this crime. To recap:

According to the official story Oswald could only have fired three shots (it was impossible to fire more from his position when compared to the film evidence), that the first shot went through the President and into Governor Connolly, the second shot missed (it hit the sidewalk), while the final shot was into JFK's head.

1. An audio recording of the attack indicates more than three shots were fired. According the the official story it was impossible for Oswald to have fired more than three times, therefore a second gunman must have been present.

2. The "magic bullet", that MUST have caused wounds to both JFK and Governor Connolly, if the official story is to be believed, is planted evidence. It's impossible for this particular bullet to have remained in such a pristine condition after punching though the muscle and bone of two people. The one claim saying that the bullet could have survived with so little deformation should be viewed suspiciously, seeing as there has never been a successful repetition of this questionable ballistics test.

3. The Zapruder Film indicates the head shot came from the front. Oswald was shooting from behind.

When we take the physical evidence together with the witness testimony from Governor Connolly, who said he heard gunfire BEFORE he was shot (you can see him turning around in the car to look while JFK is struggling with the wound in his neck) it's obvious the official timeline is false. Remember the official story has JFK shot through the neck, with the first round, simultaneous to Connolly being hit. Yet we have Connolly indicating he was still unhurt after already hearing the first shot. The Zapruder film confirms this account rather than the official narrative.

So we have one shot to JFK's neck, one into the road, one to Connolly and one more to JFK's head. That is 4. The sound recording also shows that there were at least 4, maybe up to 5 shots. If there were more than 3 shots, then there must have been more than one shooter.

It's more than likely that Oswald did not fire any shots at all and was, as he claimed, "just a patsy."

[UPDATE: It has come to my attention that the audio analysis of the "gunshot noises" has been discredited and should be discounted. Nevertheless, each of the second two points presented here are damning in themselves with regard to the truthfulness of the offical story.]

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 23rd, 2011.]


steven andresen said...


I have to ask about the point of questioning the official story of anything.

Suppose your boss decides he wants to hire a blonde to manage the office in which you work. She obviously doesn't know how best to deal with the issues of that office, she has little work experience, and her efforts make the company less profitable. However, it does not take long to understand that the boss hired the blonde because of his personal feelings toward the girl. It also becomes clear that no matter what arguments anyone in the company brings up to question the wisdom of this hiring will go nowhere. The boss does not want to listen to complaints, and he will think about firing anyone who persists in their complaints.

The arguments that people make about the official stories about JFK, or RFK, MLK, or watergate, or Wellstone, or 9-11, are like the arguments people in this office might bring up about the blonde. The people in charge do not want anyone to complain about or make an issue of their command decisions. This fact about official stories shows that we live in a country run as the property of the rich elites. They are like this boss who keeps making decisions to kill this guy, or that one, invade this country, or spend money on that fool project, and they will not listen to or even allow complaints about what they have done.

It's their country, and we just live in it.

So, what is the point of questioning these official stories?

Do you think that if everyone in the office understood that the blonde hire was there to satisfy the bosses needs and her in-competencies will lead eventually to the company going bankrupt, things would change? I don't think so, sometimes the bosses will fly things into the ground and there's nothing the passengers can do about it.

Do you think that everyone could agree that elements of the government conspired to kill the President, or invade innocent countries for their profit, or kill thousands of Americans in a fake terrorist plot? Even if you could show that these claims were true, you could not get agreement between the right and the left about this. This is the point of these meaningless divisions in society. The left right and center way of dividing people up is there just so that when it becomes apparent that the pilots of society are flying us into cliff walls and the jagged rocks below, there won't be enough consensus amongst the passengers to do anything about it.

There isn't any point to questioning official stories because that assumes that things might change because those stories would be shown to be unjustified. They don't care whether they are justified. They are just stories to keep the passengers from wasting the pilot's time and decisions.

SpookyPunkos said...


In my humble opinion, the boss is not "God" and neither are the rulers of the country.

Just because things have been wrong a long time does not rule out the likelihood that things can change in the future. They cannot fire all of us information repeaters/activists in the end, especially if there are a great many of us.

The reason for posting injustices such as the JFK assassination is to remind people about the land they inhabit- the more ignorant you are the less likely you are able to appreciate the scale of the injustices against you.

Another quote comes to mind: The Struggle of People Against Power is the Struggle of Memory against Forgetting.

I would hate to see the world fully descend into a 1984 type of society where we have always been at War with Eastasia. Likewise I would hate to see a world where everyone believed the government and had no recourse to contrary information.

We'll have to get around to firing those bosses and get rid of the blonde.

Spook !