Friday, 9 September 2011

CONSPIRACY PROOF: THE FORENSIC EVIDENCE THAT ENDS THE 911 TRUTH DEBATE.

There exists some extremely disturbing scientific evidence which totally undermines the official 911 story. It does not matter what theories you believe in, the material here speaks for itself:





The picture above shows MOLTEN STEEL being removed from the World Trade Centre rubble pile. However, from all accounts (even the official NIST report concedes this point) the fires in the WTC buildings were far too weak to cause such melting. Conventional building fires, including ones initiated with aviation kerosene, simply cannot raise the temperature of structural steel to its melting point of around 1400 degrees celsius. According to all the available data, the fires in the Towers could only have reached a maximum temperature of around 650 degrees celsius- yet here we can see steel so hot that it has taken on a yellow look (an observation that indicates the temperature must be between 1050-1100 degrees celsius !).

There are ONLY two ways which would enable this steel to reach such a high temperature:
1. In a blast furnace.
2. From chemical incendiaries.


The rubble pile was not a blast furnace.
Therefore one must assume that incendiaries were the most likely agent.

Critically, scientific analysis conducted by physics Professor Steven Jones uncovered the chemical signature for the incendiary THERMATE in multiple samples taken from the WTC steel and dust- proving, without doubt, that such materials were present.

The science here is clear cut.


Furthermore, there are clear indications that explosives were also used to bring down the World Trade Centre Buildings. Eyewitness testimony from firefighters and civilians reveals many of them felt, and were knocked over by, huge explosions occurring in the lower floors of the WTC buildings -far away from the fire zones.

In a peer reviewed scientific paper Professor Niels Harrit, and an international team of scientists, conclusively proved that particles of high tech explosive material, nanothermite, were present all throughout the WTC dust. The quantity of this recovered material indicated that many tons of this explosive substance were used in the demolitions of these buildings.



Whatever one thinks about the various theories floating around about the attacks, one thing is certain: The scientific evidence shows that the Twin Towers and Building 7 were rigged to collapse.


Because it would take many weeks to plan and carry out, least part of the 911 attacks, against the World Trade Centre complex, MUST have involved inside help. Bin Laden's men would not have had the necessary time or access to "wire" these buildings.

The charade must end. If we are honest with ourselves we must now accept there is damning physical (forensic) evidence that undermines the official 911 story and that there are certain elements within the US government complicit in the attacks.[1] A new independent criminal investigation must be launched and the phony "war on terror" ended.

(For a more detailed analysis on the physics of the WTC collapses see Steven Jones' paper: Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse? [PDF] and visit Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, an organisation with over 1500 building professionals who agree with these findings.)


Note: I will continue to post 911 information at this blog, ad infinitum, until we see a proper criminal investigation. Once everyone can see that 911 was an inside job (and be able to openly talk about the crime) then action WILL follow.


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 9th, 2011.]

1 comment:

steven andresen said...

spook,

I take it your project is not just to show, or suggest, that the 9-11 murders involved an "inside job." You want to say that there was some purpose to the madness. In a way, the 9-11 murders were like a gunshot fired next to a jittery herd of cattle. The loud bang is intended to scare the herd into stampeding away...to do certain things.

So, it may be that the gunshot was intended to justify the wars afterward pursued, the patriot act soon passed, and the constant financial thievery then being pursued.

The institutional theorists object to the "inside job" claim because, perhaps, they reject the claim that the institutions involved could carry out any such intention.

That is, the only possible culprits, the institutions, could not have the motivations so supposed.

Hence, for them, the 9-11 murders could not have been the result of some +inside job."

s.