Thursday, 28 July 2011

Sorry, But You've Been Had

The debate about global warming has reached ridiculous proportions and is full of micro thin half-truths and misunderstandings.

I am a scientist who was on the carbon gravy train, I understand the evidence, I was once an alarmist, but I am now a sceptic.
-----------------------------------------
Weather balloons had been measuring the atmosphere since the 1960s, many thousands of them every year. The climate models all predict that as the planet warms, a hot-spot of moist air will develop over the tropics about 10km up, as the layer of moist air expands upwards into the cool dry air above.

During the warming of the late 1970s, 80s, and 90s, the weather balloons found no hot-spot. None at all. Not even a small one. This evidence proves the climate models are fundamentally flawed and they greatly overestimate the temperature increases due to carbon dioxide.

This evidence first became clear around the mid-1990s.

At this point official climate science stopped being a science. You see, in science empirical evidence always trumps theory, no matter how much you are in love with the theory. If theory and evidence disagree, real scientists scrap the theory. But official climate science ignored the crucial weather balloon evidence, and other subsequent evidence that backs it up, and instead clung to their carbon dioxide theory this just happens to keep them in high-paying jobs with lavish research grants, and gives great political power to their government masters.

There are now several independent pieces of evidence showing that the earth responds to the warming due to extra carbon dioxide by /dampening /the warming. Every long-lived natural system behaves this way, counteracting any disturbances; otherwise the system would be unstable. The climate system is no exception, and now we can prove it.

But the alarmists say the exact opposite, that the climate system amplifies any warming due to extra carbon dioxide, and is potentially unstable. Surprise - surprise, their predictions of planetary temperature made in 1988 to the US Congress, and again in 1990, 1995, and 2001, have all proved much higher than reality.

They keep lowering the temperature increases they expect, from 0.30C per decade in 1990, to 0.20C per decade in 2001, and now 0.15C per decade yet they have the gall to tell us its worse than expected. These people are not scientists. They over-estimate the temperature increases due to carbon dioxide, selectively deny evidence, and now they cheat and lie to conceal the truth.
http://www.truthwinds.com/siterun_data/environment/weather_and_climate/news.php?q=1311700951

The lying and cheating is perhaps best exemplified in the Climategate scandal and subsequent cover-ups. The hearings that supposedly cleared the Climate researchers of wrongdoing was a political scam.

And now the result of this warming ideology, and the corruption, is the believe by many people in the world, including scientists and academics, that there is hard science backing the "Global Warming Consensus."

If enough honest scientists speak out about the truth, then this situation can be rectified.

Hopefully the population of our planet will learn a valuable lesson here, the same one taught by Galileo's situation, that we must think for ourselves, be rigorous in understanding about where our beliefs come from, to only accept the word of the authorities if they can show, in an open way (no hiding of raw data!), why their position is the most reasonable.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, July 28th, 2011.]

No comments: