Monday, 27 September 2010

Alternative Media and Ahamadinejad's Speech. Total Silence! Total Censorship.

I looked at Alternet, CommonDreams, Truthout, DemocracyNow, Counterpunch, I did see a small mention of the speech on DemocracyNow, as part of their news rundown. No details. I didn't see anything on's listing of headlines around the world that normally would have had information about the speech.

I think this is a clear indication that our progressive and independent alternative media is completely controlled. By whom? Well, it seems by the big foundations that help fund these sites. If you go to the foundational support for any of these sites, you will find foundations that link back to the likes of the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation, Charles Steart Mott Foundation, McKnight Foundation, Joyce Foundation, and many others.

Michel Chossudovsky explains in his article at Global Research, "Manufacturing Dissent", that this funding is part of a plan by the elites to actually control the content and actions of the so called "people's movement", in that while allowing these groups to actively dissent against the globalization movement of the international powerful elites, they actively fund them so that limits can be placed where necessary. They realize that it is healthiest for a lot of antiglobalization activity to occur, but only up to a certain point, and it is better that they fund those groups that acknowledge their limits and ensure that no real change ever comes about. Certainly one of the limits is that 9/11 truth is not presented in any media outlets "on the take".

Apart from corruption, and corrupt decision making, some of those writing in these progressive sites have been genuinely hoodwinked by the official 911 story. Their sophisticated education only goes so far and they do not fully appreciate the deeper layers of the US shadow government. Referring to other academics or experts, who are either as ignorant as they are or part of the Establishment (OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD), they cannot bring themselves to research past the disinformation.

No, the Debunkers, the docos put out by the BBC, National Geographic, and Nova (etc) do not answer all the questions or address the hard evidence that proves 911 was an inside job. Those uncorrupted journalists in the progressive media, the ones that still back the official account, need to get real about what they've ASSUMED.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 27th, 2010.]

1 comment:

Faith-R-Michaels said...

While the alternative news media does an important job it is true that they have to be held to a different standard of news than us Bloggers..Bloggers are free agents and can blog about whatever they like and it is this freedom by independent freelance writers(that do not get paid for writing...) that has made 9/11 truth the subject spoke about in the U.N.
Good job at pointing out a very important fact.