Sunday, 25 October 2009

Historic 9/11 Debate with Bigard, Laurent, Kassovitz and Harrit on French TV [Oct 28]- CANCELLED !

You have until October 28 to learn French because French TV France 2’s “L’objet du scandale” with Guillaume Durand will air a historic debate over the official version of the 9/11 events.

On one side: 4 people with the hard task to defend the official version. On the other side, Jean-Marie Bigard, Mathieu Kassovitz, Éric Laurent and special guest Niels Harrit will tell France and the world why they don’t support the official theory and why they find it disturbing.

This is already a victory for the Bigard/Kassovitz camp who challenged the French media to organize a fair debate over 9/11 after being vilified by many French journalists because of their positions on 9/11.

[UPDATE: The Debate has been cancelled. France 2 Backs Away From Real Debate, censors Niels Harrit and Éric Laurent. This move reveals the mainstream media, in practically every country, is likely corrupt or too afraid to hold an honest debate. We cannot trust our "own" media. Everyone has to work around this block, using the internet as the primary tool to wake people up. Thanks to s. for news about this development !]

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, October 25th, 2009.]


steven andresen said...



SpookyPunkos said...

FRANCE 2 TV cancelled the debate !

Obviously they have everything to fear from airing such an encounter.

We shall continue with our internet activities. If the mainstream media cannot help us, we must help ourselves !

I will add an update to the post.

Thanks s.

steven andresen said...


I wonder,

can you sponsor your own debate? Could you set out a challenge, present the issues that seem to be most important and revealing, and invite respondents to present cases?

Is there some neutral website that would do the work of refereeing the debate?


SpookyPunkos said...

I think the importance of a 911 truth debate lies in the exposure it generates.

It's really a matter of promoting the material evidence that has proven the case for the inside job.

The primary goal is to have more people realise what has happened. There are plenty of online threads and "debates" that anyone can read.

Unfortunately as far as finding a good online location for a debate, the high traffic left and right wing news sites will avoid the 911 issue. Huffington Post, Daily Kos etc are known to dismiss the subject. Repeated attempts to get them onboard have failed.

Big sites that do cover 911 already have informed audiences.

The strategy, it seems, is to work around the blocks, whilst also directly challenging the blocking sites (and mainstream media)- from time to time. By printing important stories, we can "steal" their audiences.

One other thing to consider is the nature of the 911 evidence. It is so strong that people who discover the truth do not "convert" back. So many credible people have joined now that eventually the censorship will be brushed aside.

Things will change eventually, despite the lack of engagement with the mainstream media. We should keep trying to engage with them no matter how incompetent or corrupt the editors, producers or journalists might be. We should not be too discouraged if things don't always work out !