Friday, 24 April 2009

We are Avoiding Physics of WTC

Recently, explosive scientific evidence proving that high-tech nano-thermitic material was present in the World Trade Center dust was reported in a scientific journal titled, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe."

Authored by an international team of physicists and chemists, the article in the Open Chemical Physics Journal 2009, Vol. 2, said, "We conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material."

In short, the paper destroys the official story that "no evidence" exists for explosive or pyrotechnic materials in the WTC towers, and is devastating to the mainstream "explanation" that three WTC buildings were somehow demolished by the two hijacked airplanes. Further, it reinforces the position of over 600 registered architects and engineers who have shown the impossibilities of a gravity-driven "collapse" as put fourth with the "official" version.

Because of the difficulty in refuting the solid evidence of explosives inside those three towers, defenders of the "official story" have resorted to ridicule the character of the article's publisher, and those engineers that trust physics over politics.

Why hasn't this been reported in the mainstream media? Perhaps because most are afraid to really look into the physics of 9/11, since fear of the known is sometimes worse then fear of the unknown.


Jonathan H. Cole
http://www.sunnewspapers.net/articles/edStory.aspx?articleID=435991

I would wager that the (uncorrupted) mainstream media chiefs are relatively unimaginative political animals who don't have a firm grasp of science and are unwilling to stick their necks out. They're chicken.

We here online will do everything we can to inform the public to make the job of the media chiefs easier.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, April 24th, 2009.]

2 comments:

steven andresen said...

spook,

I came across mention of this video,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o

There seems to be more involving this speaker.

There was a question posed by X, who seems to be a 9-11 truth skeptic, about how anyone explains how "10-100 tons of explosives' could have been carried into a building that was used all the time.

I suspect the answer has to do with a company doing repairs in the weeks to months just prior to 9-11, and whose records were ...conveniently...destroyed in the towers.

Is there any discussion of this issue in english?

SpookyPunkos said...

Steve,

In response to the skeptic.

The Professor was speculating that there must have been a large amount of this explosive present since it was found in all the dust samples they looked at.

Whether it was 10 or 100 tons we don't know. However, there is no doubt this stuff exists. The skeptic can talk all day about how "impossible" it might have been to rig the buildings, but the explosive is there.

I don't know about any English discussion about this matter, in terms of explosive tonnage estimates, but there are a number of stories on the Thermitic material (I posted a few different articles on this headline).

I read, and posted recently about the work done on the buildings here which you read:
http://spookyweather.blogspot.com/2009/04/port-authority-of-nynj-records-for.html

There is limited additional information on the upgrades and repairs carried out in the years before event. Kevin Ryan mentions that there were fire safety upgrades in his Alex Jones interview.

Also I posted the You Tube interview you mentioned here earlier on my Blog ... I might post it once more to remind readers about its importance !