Sunday, 19 October 2008

Allan Rees Interviews Dr. Shyam Sunder

Dr. Shyam Sunder, the lead WTC 7 investigator for NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), interviewed by Allan Rees of

Audio Archive: Interview Audio (~5MB MP3 Audio)

Dr Sunder describes the non-actions of NIST in their "investigation" of the collapse of World Trade Centre 7 and the Twin Towers. The NIST investigators seemed to have discounted, a priori, any information that did not fit in with their predetermined conclusion that fires brought down the World Trade Centre buildings.

Sunder dismissed hard physical evidence at variance with the official study as insignificant "isolated observations" (nothing to see here !) Any counter-prevailing facts are only wild "speculation".

Sunder also mentions that much of the testimony they use to support their version of events is confidential- and therefore not verifiable by independent researchers.

Sunder also misstated some facts, the most glaring was his description of a bright liquid material flowing from the side of the building that he said was "silvery". It was actually bright yellow in colour, a very significant error when it comes to making an accurate scientific assessment of this anomaly.

From listening to the interview, it is no wonder that Sunder and NIST representatives refuse to openly debate members of Architects and Engineer for 911 Truth. Dr Sunder revealed the NIST investigation to be thoroughly biased against any evidence that did not fall into their fire collapse theories.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, October 19th, 2008.]

No comments: