Thursday, 11 May 2017

Loretta Lynch Would Do Anything to Protect Clinton - Bill Still


I’m still reporting on the Clintons. According to Fox News Pentagon reporter Catherine Herrige, during last week’s Senate Intelligence Committee Hearing, FBI Director James Comey would not comment on Senator Chuck Grassley’s question concerning recent reports that a hacked email said that Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch said that she would do anything necessary to prevent criminal charges from being brought against Hillary Clinton.

According to Comey, therefore he knew he was on his own in attempting to pursue Clinton. Herrige’s bombshell report, however, has gone nearly unnoticed. Listen to her report. [insert]

So, according to Comey, this makes some sort of sense of why he did a presser to explain why Hillary Clinton was guilty of numerous felonies, but then announced he couldn’t charge her. Why? Because he knew that Loretta Lynch would kill any referral Comey sent to her.

But is that really a good excuse? No! Comey should have made the criminal referral to the Justice Department because that’s the way our system is set up. It would have been the right thing to do – even the legal thing to do. How Comey can escape facing impeachment at this point is beyond understanding. Had Comey followed the law, he would rightly have put the onus on Loretta Lynch – a mere figure head – a placeholder – in the greatest criminal enterprise the United States has ever seen – the Clinton/Obama crime syndicate.



With Trump firing Comey, I wonder if he did this because Comey could not maintain the cover-up (which is evident from this post) and he is looking for a replacement that can, or because Trump wanted Comey to act against the Clintons (and he didn't).

Regardless, it's obvious that the Clinton campaign broke the law numerous times with their emailing of classified material.

Related:

FBI’s Comey Debunks Huma Abedin’s Excuse for Clinton Emails Appearing on Anthony Weiner’s Laptop

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 11th, 2017.]

No comments: