Thursday, 31 March 2016

John Kerry’s Plan to Balkanize Middle East Countries. The Partition of Syria “if Negotiations Fail”


Last month, US secretary of State John Kerry called for Syria to be partitioned saying it was “Plan B” if negotiations fail. But in reality this was always plan A. Plans to balkanize Syria, Iraq and other Middle Eastern states were laid out by former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in a 2006 trip to Tel Aviv. It was part of the so called “Project For a New Middle East”. This was a carbon copy of the Odid Yinon plan drawn up by Israel in 1982. The plan outlined the way in which Middle Eastern countries could be balkanized along sectarian lines. This would result in the creation of several weak landlocked micro-states that would be in perpetual war with each other and never united enough to resist Israeli expansionism.
“Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi’ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan… ” Oded Yinon, “A strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties”,
The leaked emails of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reveal advocates of the Oded Yinon plan were behind the US push for regime change in Syria. An Israeli intelligence adviser writes in an email to Hillary,
“The fall of the House of Assad could well ignite a sectarian war between the Shiites and the majority Sunnis of the region drawing in Iran, which, in the view of Israeli commanders would not be a bad thing for Israel and its Western allies,”.
Kerry’s plan B comment came right before UN’s special envoy de Mistura said federalism would be discussed at the Geneva talks due to a push from major powers. Both side’s of the Geneva talks, the Syrian Government and the Syrian National Coalition flat out rejected Federalism. Highlighting the fact that the idea did not come from the Syrian’s themselves. The Syrian ambassador to the United Nations, Bashar Al Jaafari, said that the Idea of federalization would not be up for discussion. “Take the idea of separating Syrian land out of your mind,” he would say.
 
But some may not completely understand the full implications of federalism and how it is intrinsically tied to balkanization. Some cite the fact that Russia and the United States are successful federations as evidence that federation is nothing to fear. However the point that makes these federalism statements so dangerous is that in accordance with the Yinon plan the borders of a federalized Syria would be drawn along sectarian lines not on whether any particular state can sustain its population.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/john-kerrys-plan-to-balkanize-middle-east-countries-the-partition-of-syria-if-negotiations-fail/5517267

The US desire for regime change in Syria, and/or the destruction of the country, never changed, only their (machiavellian) rhetoric. The US Government is thoroughly corrupt and is an ever present threat to peace in the Middle East.

Related Info:

International Military Review - Syria: Liberation of Palmyra


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 31st, 2016.]

Probable Cause with Sibel Edmonds - False Flag Ops, the Morning After & the Profiteers


This is our third episode in our coverage of the recent Belgium Bombing as another synthetic terror event carried out under Operation Gladio B. In this episode we’ll begin looking at reactions, events and actions that are taking place since the execution of this recent plot, and the ones that took place before that. We’ll look at objectives that are being pursued and pushed, and who benefits from it all.
We look at the chain of events following a synthetically created terror action. And with that we see the needed juice that expands our wars, and expands our police and surveillance practices. The existence and expansion of the Military and Intelligence industrial Complexes depend on terrorism. And what wouldn’t they do to ensure that we have plenty of that?




[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 31st, 2016.]

No Paper Trail Left Behind: the Theft of the 2004 Presidential Election (RECAP)


“Alice laughed: “There’s no use trying,” she said; “one can’t believe impossible things.” “I daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said the Queen. “When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.” (Through the Looking Glass)

In order to believe that George Bush won the November 2, 2004 presidential election, you must also believe all of the following extremely improbable or outright impossible things.1

1) A big turnout and a highly energized and motivated electorate favored the GOP instead of the Democrats for the first time in history.2

2) Even though first-time voters, lapsed voters (those who didn’t vote in 2000), and undecideds went for John Kerry by big margins, and Bush lost people who voted for him in the cliffhanger 2000 election, Bush still received a 3.4 million vote surplus nationally.3

3) The fact that Bush far exceeded the 85% of registered Florida Republicans’ votes that he got in 2000, receiving in 2004 more than 100% of the registered Republican votes in 24 out of 67 Florida counties, more than 200% of registered Republicans in 10 counties, over 300% of registered Republicans in 4 counties, more than 400% of Registered Republicans in 4 counties, and over 700% in one county. This could only be explained by a massive crossover vote in these specific counties by registered Democrats and/or Independents. Bush’s share of crossover votes by registerd Democrats in Florida, however, did not actually increase over 2000 and he lost ground among registered Independents, dropping 15 points. Floridians were just so enthused about Bush and Cheney that they somehow managed to overrule basic math.4

4) The fact that Bush got more votes than registered voters, and the fact that by stark contrast participation rates in many Democratic strongholds in Ohio and Florida fell to as low as less than 8%, do not indicate a rigged election.5

5) Bush won re-election despite approval ratings below 50% – the first time in history this has happened. Harry Truman has been cited as having also done this, but Truman’s polling numbers were trailing so much behind his challenger, Thomas Dewey, pollsters stopped surveying two weeks before the 1948 elections, thus missing the late surge of support for Truman. Unlike Truman, Bush’s support was clearly eroding on the eve of the election.6

6) Harris’ and Zogby’s last-minute polling indicating a Kerry victory was wrong (even though Harris and Zogby were exactly on the mark in their 2000 election final polls).7

7) The “challenger rule” – an incumbent’s final results won’t be better than his final polling – was wrong;8

8) On election day the early-day voters picked up by early exit polls (showing Kerry with a wide lead) were heavily Democratic instead of the traditional pattern of early voters being mainly Republican.

9) The fact that Bush “won” Ohio by 51-48%, but this was not matched by the court-supervised hand count of the 147,400 absentee and provisional ballots in which Kerry received 54.46% of the vote doesn’t cast any suspicion upon the official tally.9

10) Florida computer programmer Clinton Curtis (a life-long registered Republican) must be lying when he said in a sworn affidavit that his employers at Yang Enterprises, Inc. (YEI) and Tom Feeney (general counsel and lobbyist for YEI, GOP state legislator and Jeb Bush’s 1994 running mate for Florida Lt. Governor) asked him in 2000 to create a computer program to undetectably alter vote totals. Curtis, under the initial impression that he was creating this software in order to forestall possible fraud, handed over the program to his employer Mrs. Li Woan Yang, and was told: “You don’t understand, in order to get the contract we have to hide the manipulation in the source code. This program is needed to control the vote in south Florida.” (Boldface in original).10

11) Diebold CEO Walden O’Dell’s declaration in a August 14, 2003 letter to GOP fundraisers that he was “committed to helping Ohio to deliver its electoral votes to the president next year” and the fact that Diebold is one of the three major suppliers of the electronic voting machines in Ohio and nationally, didn’t result in any fraud by Diebold.

12) There was no fraud in Warren County, Ohio where they admitted counting the votes in secret before bringing them out in public to count, citing an unidentified FBI agent’s warning of a terrorist incident as the rationale, a report that the FBI denies ever making.

13) CNN reported at 9 p.m. EST on election evening that Kerry was leading by 3 points in the national exit polls based on well over 13,000 respondents. Several hours later at 1:36 a.m. CNN reported that the exit polls, now based on a few hundred more – 13,531 respondents – were showing Bush leading by 2 points, a 5-point swing. In other words, a swing of 5 percentage points from a tiny increase in the number of respondents somehow occurred despite it being mathematically impossible.11

14) Exit polls in the November 2004 Ukrainian presidential elections, paid for in part by the Bush administration, were right, but exit polls in the U.S., where exit polling was invented, were very wrong.12

15) The National Election Pool’s exit polls13 were so far off that since their inception twenty years ago, they have never been this wrong, more wrong than statistical probability indicates is possible.

16) In every single instance where exit polls were wrong the discrepancy favored Bush, even though statistical probability tells us that any survey errors should show up in both directions. Half a century of polling and centuries of mathematics must be wrong.
http://www.projectcensored.org/voter-fraud-august-2005/

Related Info:

Hacking Democracy - The Hack


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 31st, 2016.]

Trump and Clinton: Censoring the Unpalatable - John Pilger


A virulent if familiar censorship is about to descend on the US election campaign. As the cartoon brute, Donald Trump, seems almost certain to win the Republican Party’s nomination, Hillary Clinton is being ordained both as the “women’s candidate” and the champion of American liberalism in its heroic struggle with the Evil One.

The 2008 presidential campaign of Barack Obama should have alerted even the most dewy-eyed. Obama based his “hope” campaign almost entirely on the fact of an African-American aspiring to lead the land of slavery. He was also “anti-war”.
 
Obama was never anti-war. On the contrary, like all American presidents, he was pro-war. He had voted for George W. Bush’s funding of the slaughter in Iraq and he was planning to escalate the invasion of Afghanistan. In the weeks before he took the presidential oath, he secretly approved an Israeli assault on Gaza, the massacre known as Operation Cast Lead. He promised to close the concentration camp at Guantanamo and did not. He pledged to help make the world “free from nuclear weapons” and did the opposite.
 
As a new kind of marketing manager for the status quo, the unctuous Obama was an inspired choice. Even at the end of his blood-spattered presidency, with his signature drones spreading infinitely more terror and death around the world than that ignited by jihadists in Paris and Brussels, Obama is fawned on as “cool” (the Guardian).
 
On March 23, Counterpunch published my article, “A World War has Begun: Break the Silence”. As has been my practice for years, I then syndicated the piece across an international network, including Truthout.com, the liberal American website. Truthout publishes some important journalism, not least Dahr Jamail’s outstanding corporate exposes.
 
Truthout rejected the piece because, said an editor, it had appeared on Counterpunch and had broken “guidelines”. I replied that this had never been a problem over many years and I knew of no guidelines.
 
My recalcitrance was then given another meaning. The article was reprieved provided I submitted to a “review” and agreed to changes and deletions made by Truthout’s “editorial committee”. The result was the softening and censoring of my criticism of Hillary Clinton, and the distancing of her from Trump. The following was cut:
Trump is a media hate figure. That alone should arouse our scepticism. Trump’s views on migration are grotesque, but no more grotesque than David Cameron. It is not Trump who is the Great Deporter from the United States, but the Nobel Peace Prize winner Barack Obama … The danger to the rest of us is not Trump, but Hillary Clinton. She is no maverick. She embodies the resilience and violence of a system… As presidential election day draws near, Clinton will be hailed as the first female president, regardless of her crimes and lies – just as Barack Obama was lauded as the first black president and liberals swallowed his nonsense about “hope”.
The “editorial committee” clearly wanted me to water down my argument that Clinton represented a proven extreme danger to the world. Like all censorship, this was unacceptable.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/trump-and-clinton-censoring-the-unpalatable/5517168

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 31st, 2016.]

Powerful Black Women Endorse Trump



Yes I am black. Yes I am a woman. Two categories the media is hell bent on declaring Trump has no support from. Well, I'm here today to let them know they're wrong. I am 100% for TRUMP!!!




Related:

Donald Trump a Racist?

Melania Trump: Women Are Treated Equal To Men In the Trump Organization #MakeAmericaGreatAgain

Some Donald Trump Endorsements

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 31st, 2016.]

Wednesday, 30 March 2016

Probable Cause with Sibel Edmonds - Belgium Bombing: All the Gladio’s Protected Terror Men


This is a follow-up to our previous overview of the recent Belgium Bombing carrying every single hallmark of Operation Gladio B. I present one of the common trademarks present in all Gladio B synthetic terror operations since 9/11, and illustrate how Gladio’s terror operations always come with multiple forewarnings, and how, despite all the scripted and on-the-record forewarnings, the operatives are allowed to travel, communicate, and execute the intended and synthetically-created terror plots.

There will be more to discuss and analyze on this latest Operation Gladio B synthetic terror event. In our next episode I’ll be looking at what has already been taking place since the execution of the plot, which objectives are being pushed, and who benefits from it all.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 30th, 2016.]

Problem. Reaction. Solution. (Brussels Edition)


The dust has barely settled on the site of the Brussels bomb blasts and already the EUreaucrats are salivating about the prospect of a pan-European intelligence agency. Join James for today's Thought for the Day as he explains the latest example of how the authoritarians take more control after every major terror event.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 30th, 2016.]

Keiser Report (E893): Despair Fatigue


In this episode of the Keiser Report, Max and Stacy ask not what corporations can do for you, they, instead, ask what you can do for your corporations. They look at how multinationals and giant corporations like Pfizer and AT&T ‘lobby’ politicians to increase costs to consumers and restrict competition. In the second half, Max and Stacy continue their talk with anthropologist and LSE professor, David Graeber, about his latest article, Despair Fatigue.



Graeber in the second half points out that if people are not protesting corruption because they lack a common purpose or sense of community. Nevertheless, protests in the UK do occur but it is not reported by the media.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 30th, 2016.]

Still Report # 740 Trump's Great Answer on Hillary (Jail)


Recently, Donald Trump was asked about jailing Hillary Clinton.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 30th, 2016.]

Tuesday, 29 March 2016

Syrian Army Retakes Palmyra from ISIS


Syrian government forces have retaken the ancient city of Palmyra from Islamic State. The army now aims to use the desert city as a 'launchpad' to expand operations against the terrorist group.



The western proxy army of terrorist extremists is going in reverse. A huge loss for Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the Israelis and the USA (NATO).

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 29th, 2016.]

Watchdogs to Attack Dogs: Western Liberal Media Failures [Lying] on Syria - Prof. Tim Anderson


For years there has been constant, daily repetition of claims that the Syrian Army was killing ‘civilians’. On the other side, ‘rebels’ backed by ‘activists’ were said to be struggling against a tyrannical and illegitimate ‘regime’. The language was always partisan, as were the sources.
 
Yet evidence shows very clearly that armed attacks on Syrian soldiers, cities and civilians have been led by al Qaeda groups, from the very beginning, and that western governments have known this. Regardless, the western liberal media acted as megaphones for the false stories.
 
For example, in May 2011, well before ISIS came to Syria, the genocidal slogan ‘Christians to Beirut, Alawis to the tomb’ was reported (Blanford 2011), chanted in the city of Homs by the Farouq Brigade, the largest ‘Free Syrian Army’ (FSA) group. At the same time Syrian Salafi leader Adnan Arour, declared ‘we shall mince [the Alawites] in meat grinders and feed their flesh to the dogs’ (MEMRITV 2011). All through this period the WLM was chanting ‘peaceful protestors’.
 
Farouq was joined in Homs by foreign jihadis from Jabhat al Nusra, their foreign al Qaeda support group, and both engaged in a series of sectarian massacres, often falsely blaming them on the Syrian Army (Anderson 2015). By early 2012 the Christian media was reporting large scale ethnic cleansing in the Homs area as ‘Al-Qaeda-linked Islamist forces seize a golden opportunity to terrorize infidels with impunity’ (Crimi 2012).
 
During most of this time the WLM stuck with the White House and Human Rights Watch (HRW) story that Syrian security forces had been massacring ‘unarmed protestors’, that the Syrian people ‘had no choice’ but to take up arms, with this ‘protest movement’ having been ‘overwhelmingly peaceful until September 2011’ (HRW 2011, HRW 2012). Based on that argument, NATO countries proceeded to arm the ‘peaceful protestors’.
 
Important contradictions emerged in the western governments’ war stories, but the WLM ignored them. The UN reported in early 2012 that there had been around 5,000 deaths, more than half of them from the military and security forces, to be specific: “478 police and 2,091 from the military and security forces” (OHCHR 2012: 2; Narwani 2014). So ‘peaceful protestors’ killed as many as ‘the regime’? How was that possible? The WLM stuck with the official story.
 
Even after Syrian nun Mother Agnes Mariam had denounced ‘false flag’ crimes and reported on the recycling of photos of dead bodies (SANA 2011), and after western journalist Nir Rosen (2012) reported that the Islamist ‘rebels’ were dressing up their own casualties as ‘civilians’, the WLM stuck to its jihadist-linked sources, reporting that the Syrian Army was constantly targeting ‘civilians’.
----------------------------------------------
Western ‘think tanks’ fell into line. A September 2012 Quilliam Institute briefing claimed that ‘The vast majority of the opposition fighters are legitimate nationalists fighting for the country’s freedom and the establishment of a democratic state … most members within the FSA are pious rather than Islamists and are not motivated by sectarianism’ (Benotman and Naseraldin 2012: 1). Similarly, in October 2012, the International Crisis Group, while recognising a Salafi strand in the fighters, spoke of ‘a moderate Islamic tradition’, suggesting that Farouq might be a secular group (ICG 2012: i, 6).
 
This was more than a year after Farouq had been blamed for the ethnic cleansing of Homs, had publicised its bombing of hospitals, had imposed an Islamic tax and had committed several massacres in the Homs area (Anderson 2016: Ch.6). As foreign jihadists poured in across the Turkish border, clearly with NATO approval, the WLM persisted, beyond all bounds of plausibility, with the ‘civil war’ and ‘moderate rebels’ story.
 
But the US government had better sources. Two months earlier US intelligence had reported that ‘The Salafist, the Muslim Brotherhood and AQI [al Qaeda in Iraq = ISI] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria’. They want to create a ‘Salafist principality in eastern Syria’ and that was ‘exactly’ what NATO and the Gulf Monarchies want, ‘in order to isolate the Syrian regime’ (DIA 2012). This was well before ISIS came to Syria. Even after this cable was revealed, in 2014, the WLM did little to question the Washington line.
 
Created by the Bush administration in 2006 – to prevent Baghdad getting close to Tehran – and drawing on Saudi patronage, the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI) moved across into Syria in 2013. Despite the failure of a merger with Jabhat al Nusra, this second al Qaeda group began to collaborate with the NATO-backed FSA. In mid 2013 FSA commander Abdul Jabbar al-Okaidi (prominently photographed with the former US Ambassador to Syria, Robert Ford) joined forces with ISIS in the battle for Menagh airbase, in Aleppo Province. FSA man Al-Okaidi fought alongside ISIS leaders Abu Jandal (from Egypt) and Abu Omar al Shishani (US-trained, from Georgia) and was filmed celebrating victory with Abu Jandal (Anderson 2016: Chapter 6). Such facts were publicly available, through the jihadists’ own online propaganda, but they barely made a dent in Washington’s revised line: ISIS was the new evil and the western-backed ‘moderate rebels’ were fighting them.
 
False allegations against the Syrian Army blocked sympathy amongst WLMN audiences for all Syrians who were fighting to defend their country from foreign-backed terrorists. One of the first ‘false flag’ massacres, created to incite a Libyan-styled foreign intervention, was the terrible Houla massacre of May 2012. More than 100 mostly pro-government villagers (some of whom had participated in the recent congress elections) were killed after the Syrian Army drove jihadists out of nearby Homs city. An initial UN team led by Dutch General Robert Mood went to Houla and found conflicting stories, in the then jihadist-occupied area. A second UN team, hastily convened and co-chaired by US diplomat Karen Koning AbuSayd, tried to blame un-named pro-government ‘thugs’. They could not provide any motive, and ignored evidence from 15 independent witnesses who identified four local gunmen, two clans and a large Farouq FSA group led by Abdurrazzaq Tlass and Yahya Yusuf (Anderson 2015; Anderson 2016: Ch. 8). Syria was internationally sanctioned on the basis of these fabricated claims. But dissent at the Security Council prevented UN intervention.
 
Syria became the site of many similar ‘false flag’ incidents. Some were even exposed by western journalists, such as the 2012 FSA massacre of villagers at Aqrab (Homs) and of many hostages in Daraya (south Damascus). In both cases the Army was initially blamed, but western observers (Thompson 2012; Fisk 2012) reported convincingly that the al Qaeda groups were responsible.
----------------------------------------------
The western liberal media actively promoted a major chemical weapons incident staged by the sectarian groups in the East Ghouta (countryside Damascus) in August 2013. Long after an array of independent evidence disproved allegations that the Syrian Army was responsible, the WLM repeated these false claims. That incident, complete with video of drugged or dead children, did involve real chemical weapons. An unknown number were killed; 1,400 un-named victims were mentioned, but only eight bodies were reported buried (ISTEAMS 2013).

At the time of this incident, UN chemical weapons inspectors were in Syria at the invitation of the Syrian Government, to investigate the al Qaeda groups’ use of sarin gas in Khan al-Asal, near Aleppo. Those same groups used the occasion to divert attention from that incident, stage another attack and blame it on the government.

Yet the government had no plausible motive. Further, studies by US experts at MIT showed the rockets to have a much shorter range than was suggested. The final report by Lloyd and Postol (2014) was fatal to the US story. It concluded that the rockets ‘could not possibly have been fired at East Ghouta from the ‘heart’, or from the eastern edge, of the Syrian Government controlled area shown in the intelligence map published by the White House on August 30, 2013’.

US intelligence sources confirmed this. Veteran North American journalist Seymour Hersh (2013) interviewed US agents and concluded that Washington’s claims on the evidence had been fabricated. He found “intense concern” and anger amongst US agents over “the deliberate manipulation of intelligence”. Other reports from Syria (e.g. Gavlak and Ababneh 2013; ISTEAMS 2013) further exposed the fabrication.

The independent evidence was overwhelming and inescapable: chemical weapons had been used in East Ghouta, but the charges against the Syrian Army were fabricated. Logically this meant that the al Qaeda groups based in the East Ghouta (Jabhat al Nusra, Jaysh al Islam and Ahrar as Sham) had staged the attack, to blame the Army in an attempt to attract greater foreign military support.

Regardless of this evidence, the western media in general, and the WLM in particular, endlessly recycled the lie that the Syrian Army and the Syrian President ‘gassed children’ in the East Ghouta. So, for example, Anne Gearan at the Washington Post (19 June 2014) claimed repeatedly that the Syrian Government had used chemical weapons. Michael Crowley at Time magazine (26 June 2014) wrote ‘President Bashar al Assad murdered civilians with nerve gas last year’, while Jon Snow at the UK’s Channel Four (4 September 2014) claimed ‘It’s only one year ago that chemical weapons were used by Syrian forces on its own population’. Ruth Sherlock at the UK Telegraph (10 September 2014) falsely claimed that ‘Bashar al Assad’s regime made ‘systematic’ use of chemical weapons against Syrian civilians’. All these stories were false and in reckless disregard of the evidence.

The fake claims carried on for years. The UK Guardian (14 March 2016) repeated the East Ghouta claims, adding it to other alleged Syrian government ‘chemical weapons attacks’, citing a report by the US-based Syrian American Medical Society (Shaheen 2016). SAMS is an Ohio-based partisan group which had also made false claims about Russia bombing hospitals in the terrorist held areas; the Red Cross did not support those allegations (RT 2015). Another front group, ‘Physicians for Human Rights’, falsely blamed the Syria Government for bombing al Kindi hospital in Aleppo. In fact, Jabhat al Nusra published video of its destruction of this hospital, using truck bombs and crying out ‘God is Great’ (Anderson 2016: Chapters 7 and 11). At the time of the Guardian story the Turkish Government backed ‘moderate rebels’ were under fire for using chemical attacks on Kurdish areas of Aleppo (ARA News 2016). Nevertheless, Jeffrey Goldberg in The Atlantic (‘The Obama Doctrine’, April 2016) repeated the East Ghouta lie: ‘In the Damascus suburb of Ghouta … Assad’s army had murdered more than 1,400 civilians with sarin gas’.

In context of a war where it was well known that the US President had announced a military attack would follow any Syrian use of chemical weapons, these repeated fabrications amount to propaganda for war, itself an international war crime. Whether through malice or laziness, this is an exceptionally grave crime and, were there an independent tribunal, would attract severe penalties.

Another example of active BBC collusion in fabrications was brought to light by British man Robert Stuart, who pursued the British broadcaster over a 30 September 2013 documentary titled ‘Saving Syria’s Children’. That story and linked news reports claimed the Syrian Army had launched an incendiary bomb attack on a school’, using ‘napalm’ or chemical weapons. The attack was said to be on 26 August 2013 in Urm Al-Kubra, Aleppo, just days after the East Ghouta incident. The BBC made use of prominent anti-Syrian Doctor Rola Hallam. But the ‘evidence’ was once again fabricated.

This was not simply a case of a story being compromised by partisan sources. The video was filmed by BBC staff and associates at a hospital near the school. Stuart presents evidence to show this footage was ‘largely, if not entirely, staged’. Experts examined the footage and say, effectively, that the portrayed burns victims are actors and not burns victims. Further, the audio track of Dr Hallam’s claims (she wore a surgical mask) was edited and her words changed between different versions of the video. Stuart (2013; 2015) has pursued the BBC over this fabrication, posting a catalogue of evidence online.

Just before a Geneva peace conference in January 2014, the tiny petro-monarchy of Qatar, a major sponsor of armed groups in Syria, released a report it had purchased from some British lawyers. The report showed thousands of photos of dead bodies, presenting an anonymous witness ‘Caesar’ who claimed these were victims of mass torture and murder by the Syrian Government. After two years of mass exposure of Qatar’s report, backed by US and Israeli groups, no WLM channel proved capable of pointing out one obvious fact: half the photos were of Syrian soldiers and other victims of terrorism.

The State Department linked group Human Rights Watch, which was given special access to the ‘Caesar’ archive, admitted that almost half the photos (24,568 of 53,275), at face value, showed: “dead army soldiers or members of the security forces” and “crime scene photographs taken in the aftermath of attacks … [from] several categories of incidents including the aftermath of explosions, assassinations of security officers, fires, and car bombs” (HRW 2015: 2-3). However HRW thereafter ignored all those photos and discussed the rest – those said to have died ‘in government detention’. So at the outset of a report subtitled ‘Mass Deaths and Torture in Syria’s Detention Facilities’, HRW selectively ignored 46% of photos which did not fit its theme.

It took another genuinely independent report to point out this extraordinary selectivity, and that many of the dead in the remaining 54% of photos had clearly not died in custody. There was evidence that some had died in conflict, others in hospital (after receiving treatment), while other bodies had been picked up after decomposing. Further, ‘thousands’ of the photos had been manipulated to obscure notations (Sterling 2016). That is, these were the records of hospital morgues during a war, with a wide variety of deaths and no single or reliable explanation of how they had died. Yet the UK law firm Carter Ruck, Human Rights Watch and much of the western media, simply and dishonestly asserted these were all or mainly deaths in government custody. The WLM showed no sign of even the most basic investigation, as suggested by its self-styled ‘watchdog’ role.

The BBC’s December 2015 admission that Britain was in ‘an unspoken alliance’ with al Qaeda groups ‘to destroy the Assad regime’ came 18 months after senior US officials (Vice President Joe Biden, Army chief Martin Dempsey and Senate Armed Forces chair Lindsay Graham) had admitted that their regional allies the Saudis, Turkey and Qatar were funding terrorist groups including ISIS (Anderson 2016: Ch.12). Biden and Graham blamed Turkey and the Saudis for throwing arms and money at anyone who would fight Assad. Graham pointed out ‘they fund [ISIS] because the Free Syrian Army couldn’t fight Assad, they were trying to beat Assad’ (Rothman 2014).

One full year after those senior officials admitted that their closest allies were financing ISIS, specifically to overthrow President Assad, the WLM continued to blame the Syrian President for ISIS. For example, Dominic Tierney in The Atlantic, whether stupidly or dishonestly, claimed ‘the Syrian dictator’s sinister plan … it seems, is to deliberately aid the rise of ISIS—what I call the devil’s gambit’ (Tierney 2015). Undeterred, western governments and the compliant western media kept asserting the fiction that their ‘moderate rebels’ were being armed to fight ISIS. In fact, throughout 2014-2015, thousands of US-armed mercenaries defected to Jabhat al Nusra and ISIS, along with their US weapons (Anderson 2016: Chapter 12).

The western liberal media spectacularly failed in its self-proclaimed watchdog role and, at times, engaged directly in fabrications to assist the western governments and their al Qaeda proxy armies. They did not simply fail to investigate the ‘false flag’ massacres of the western-backed groups, their complicity encouraged further massacres. They ignored the exposed ‘false flag’ massacres (e.g. in Daraya and Aqrab) and repeated the faked claims (e.g. East Ghouta) even when multiple sources of independent evidence had destroyed those claims.

Constant repetition of lies that the Syrian Army was ‘targeting civilians’ and ‘gassing children’, emboldened the al Qaeda groups, encouraging further atrocities and making any peace settlement much more difficult. The steady stream of lies and systematic reliance on partisan sources – such as the ‘Syrian Observatory of Human Rights’ – has aggravated and prolonged the dirty war on Syria. The western liberal media acted not as ‘watchdogs’ but as ‘attack dogs’, compliant creatures of their governments.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/watchdogs-to-attack-dogs-western-liberal-media-failures-on-syria/5516530

Our media is a conduit for lies, and sections of it sometimes deliberately fabricate stories to suit an agenda (regime change). This clipped text explains, in a chronological way, the war in Syria and the lies that sold the war at various stages. Misinformed people and misinformed (honest) journalists help facilitate the proxy war.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 29th, 2016.]

Paul Craig Roberts - Neoconservatives Driving World to War


Dr. Paul Craig Roberts has a new book out titled “The Neoconservative Threat To World Order.” In it, he talks about the dreadful shape of the global economy and how war might be forced on the world. Dr. Roberts, who is also a former Assistant Treasury Secretary, says, “The Neoconservative ideology is American world hegemony . . . this means you have to subdue the others, and this includes Russia and China. These are two nuclear powers with massive military capabilities, and they are in the way of the Neoconservative agenda of World Empire . . . . So, the Neoconservatives are driving the United States and Western Europe into conflict with Russia and China. Russia and China are not going to give up and be American vassals. . . . Our economy is a house of cards. It’s held up by the Federal Reserve. The question is how long can they hold it up? . . . There is no way around the coming war unless the American empire begins unraveling, which it could do.”



Roberts also points out that the ruling class, in both parties, have made plans to dump the outside candidates (Trump and Sanders) in the US elections.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 29th, 2016.]

GERALD CELENTE EXPLAINS THE HORRIFYING SICKNESS INFECTING HILLARY CLINTON VOTERS




People have been dumbed down because of the entertainment environment in which they live. People are not interested in details, only superficialities. They go for 'identity politics' (to quote from John Pilger) over substance.

However, the US voter is not entirely without his or her wits. In the 2004 Presidential Election the popular vote was stolen via vote fraud to put Bush ahead of Kerry when all the exit poll showed a John Kerry win. The general population was smart enough to kick out an obvious tyrant. There is still hope.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 29th, 2016.]

Trump Spokesperson: ‘Heidi Cruz is a Bush Operative’


After Donald Trump threatened to “spill the beans” on Heidi Cruz, his campaign reps took to the airwaves and Twitter Friday to indicate that they had done that very thing.



Great short summary of Heidi Cruz.

Related Info:

Still Report # 737 - Mistakes Made on the Cruz Sex Scandal Story


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 29th, 2016.]

Monday, 28 March 2016

Sibel Edmonds Shines A Light on the Brussels Attacks


Sibel Edmonds of Newsbud.com joins us to discuss the Brussels attacks. We discuss Belgium's central role as the base of NATO/EU/Gladio headquarters and how the script of this event follows the script of previous false flags almost precisely. We also talk about the public's reaction to these events and how both the mainstream and alternative media are being divided and conquered to keep people from questioning the true roots of these events.



James and Sibel considered that with each new terror attack in the West the less people think. To an extent this is true. This seems counter-intuitive since one might expect deeper thinking after the problems in the official stories of 9/11, 7/7 or the Boston Bombings. You would think that the public would be more skeptical. The central problem is that the public is only very slowly moving away from mainstream news sources and have a psychological deficit when it comes to trusting their own abilities to reason - to evaluate basic facts and draw reasonable conclusions for themselves.

We also face a new level of disinformation where ridicule is being pushed that is used to dissaude objective thinking on false flag events, primarily in the form of the 'everything is fake' nonsense and flat earth theories. Such kookery is designed to repulse the general public from engaging independent analysis because doing so is likened to having a mental illness. However, the real mental illness is the continual belief in Governments that have lied REPEATEDLY about things such as WMDs, torture, NSA spying, and various others crimes, while having an admitted record of using false flag terrorism (Gladio).

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 28th, 2016.]

Exposed: Plans to Balkanise #Syria


This was planned since 1982, first the Odid Yinon plan, the 2006 project for a new middle east, basically, DIVIDE and conquer.



Syrian Girl explains the role of the Kurds in the war and plans to dismantle the state. Important information that is not widely known.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 28th, 2016.]

The Pentagon Plane Puzzle (preview - ver 3)



The Pentagon Plane Puzzle (preview - ver 3) by debunkerbuster

http://911truthactivism.blogspot.com
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com

The Pentagon Plane Puzzle film is a work-in-progress. This third version integrates David Chandler's presentation "Going Beyond Speculation - A Scientific Look at the Pentagon Evidence" with video of testimonies by 30 of the 180 known on-record witnesses to the Pentagon crash. It serves as a comprehensive preview of what will be in the final film.

There are many new graphics and a few new movie clips which were not in prior versions of the film.

To learn more about this film project, and to see related materials not yet in the film, please go to this website: http://www.9-11tv.org/the-pentagon-plane-puzzle

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 28th, 2016.]

Keiser Report (E892): Valley Girl


In this episode of the Keiser Report Max and Stacy talk ‘tacos and cabernet’ as both the media elite and the political elite go like totally Valley Girl as rising inequality and declining wages stump the so-called experts. In the second half Max and Stacy talk to anthropologist and LSE professor, David Graeber, about his latest article, Despair Fatigue. They look at the latest in austerity outrages and at the complicit media which refuses to cover the resistance to these policies.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 28th, 2016.]

Mexican Ex-Employee Tells SHOCKING TRUTH ABOUT DONALD TRUMP!




Related:



WASHINGTON Less than week after Donald Trump carried nearly every county in her district during the Republican presidential primary, U.S. Rep. Renee…
OURHEALTHYHOUSE.COM


Some Donald Trump Endorsements

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 28th, 2016.]

Russia Defense Report: The MiGs Return




Good summary of the MIG/Sukhoi duopoly in Russia. The video ends by taking a shot at the current (known) US 'fifth generation' fighter program where only one company rules the roost which provides no competition or alternative aircraft types for the USAF. Presently they are stuck buying the intrinsically defective F-35, which is a tactical strike aircraft and not an air superiority fighter. 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 28th, 2016.]

Sunday, 27 March 2016

CrossTalk: Europe Terrorized


This time it was Brussels. Europe has become a battlefield in which terrorists can roam free and undetected. Of course we mourn the victims. But it is way past the time to talk honestly – Europe’s experiment with limited sovereignty is negligent and endangers citizens. And NATO’s conflicts of choice in the Middle East generate war refugees, migrants, but also terrorists of all kinds. It is time for action. CrossTalking with Pepe Escobar, Gilbert Doctorow, and John Laughland.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 27th, 2016.]

Probable Cause with Sibel Edmonds- Belgium Bombing: The Missing Context, Facts & Interests


This is a brief presentation on several important angles and facts on the recent bombings in Belgium. As always, the deep-state-mouth-piece media is presenting the entire incident with twists and omissions, so I am going to bring up at least a few things quickly here, and later, follow up with more in-depth analyses. There are, and will be, lots to discuss and analyze on this latest Operation Gladio B synthetic terror event. Also, keep in mind, what will take place afterwards, whether it is expanding the existing wars or starting new ones, whether it is furthering police state practices, is equally if not more important than the bombing itself.




Related Info:

“Suicide Bombers” Known to, Imprisoned by Security Agencies BEFORE Brussels Attack
It is now revealed that not only were at least three bombers involved in the March 22 Brussels attack well-known to Western security agencies, two – brothers Brahim and Khalid El Bakraoui – were both arrested, charged, and imprisoned for violent crimes in 2010 and 2011, the elder brother for shooting at police with an AK-47s automatic rifle during a holdup, and the younger brother for carjacking and possession of several AK-47s, respectively.
It is also now confirmed that the elder brother, Brahim El Bakraoui, was arrested and deported from Turkey last year for suspected terrorist activity, but not before Ankara attempted to notify Brussels in order for El Bakraoui to be detained upon his arrival back in the EU. Brussels, however, failed categorically to act on the alert, allowing El Bakraoui to return home without consequence.
The third suspect, Najim Laachraoui, had traveled to Syria between 2012-2013 and has had an international warrant out for his arrest since 2014 for allegedly aiding in the recruitment of Europeans for the so-called “Islamic State” (ISIS).
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/03/suicide-bombers-known-and-imprisoned-by-security-agencies-before-brussels-attack.html

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 27th, 2016.]

International Military Review – Donbass, Mar. 24




Shelling along the line of contact continues.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 27th, 2016.]

Militants Threaten Oil And Gas Infrastructure in Algeria




Algeria is at odds with Saudi Arabia over the fighting in the Middle East. Now the extremists are targeting that country. The video implies that the Saudis have a hand these terror attacks.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 27th, 2016.]

Keiser Report (E891): Warnings from Confucius


In this special double-header episode of the Keiser Report, Max and Stacy look at the warnings from Confucius and Adam Smith. First, they look at the danger of those who think but do not learn; so ‘free trade’ deals are imposed because a ‘think tank’ believes it’s a great ideological idea but without looking at history to see what happens when wealth and hope are taken from an entire class of people. Then they look at the most important issue of 2016: creeping monopolization as oligopolies emerge in every major sector in America and across the world.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 27th, 2016.]

Live Leak Article Falsely Claims Donald Trump Has Disavowed Infowars.com

"They even managed to get the Donald on their show but he has since then disavowed them."

False, he's since praised Alex Jones of Infowars and tweeted an interview he conducted with Roger Stone.

Were you confused because Roger Stone arranged Trump's interview with Infowars, but has since left the Trump campaign in an official capacity? Trump and Stone are all good as well.

Sunday, February 28, 2016:

Hillary Bans Trump Insider From CNN For Exposing Bill's Bastard Child...


Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump #RogerStone was just banned by @CNN - their loss! Tough, loyal guy.

Published on Jan 19, 2016:


TRUMP TWEETS ALEX JONES, ROGER STONE INTERVIEW

Infowars.comMARCH 24, 2016
GOP frontrunner Donald Trump on Thursday retweeted Alex Jones’ powerful impromptu interview with consumate insider Roger Stone, in which the Republican operative revealed the establishment’s plan to take Trump down.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 27th, 2016.]

Racist Robot? | Microsoft AI Experiment Under Fire



Racist Robot? | Microsoft AI Experiment Under Fire by debunkerbuster

MICROSOFT’S AI BOT GOES FROM BENEVOLENT TO NAZI IN LESS THAN 24 HOURS: http://www.infowars.com/microsofts-ai-bot-goes-from-benevolent-to-nazi-in-less-than-24-hours/

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 27th, 2016.]

Saturday, 26 March 2016

ISIS, Oil and Turkey: Ankara’s Illegal Trade with the Terrorists


An RT Documentary crew filming in northern Syria has seen Islamic State (IS, ISIS/ISIL) documents abandoned by retreating terrorists and found by the Kurds that, along with captured IS recruits, provide a stunning insight into the alleged Turkey-IS oil trade links.
 
Shortly after the outbreak of the Syrian war, IS became a game-changer in Iraq and, in particular, Syria. Beheadings on camera, mass killings, and enslavement, as well as apparent connections to the Paris and Brussels attacks had become synonymous with the terror group, giving it wide publicity.

Running a viable militant organization with such remarkable capabilities would be impossible without some logistical and financial support from the outside.

Turkey, which has been actively engaged in the Syrian war since the outset, has repeatedly denied claims that it is aiding IS. However, while Ankara insists that it is the jihadist group’s sworn enemy, facts on the ground often tell a different story.

RT has spoken to several witnesses who were involved in Islamic State’s trade activities and accessed the terror group’s documents, which provide insight into how and where foreign militants enter Syria to join the terrorist “state.”
------------------------------------
Turkey benefits from Islamic State because the terrorist group provides it with cheap oil and is fighting both Syria’s government and Kurdish population. This is an opinion shared by both Kurds and their mortal enemies from the jihadist organization. The IS documents obtained by RT may provide additional evidence revealing the dirty game being played by the government of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Syria.


http://www.globalresearch.ca/isis-oil-and-turkey-ankaras-illegal-trade-with-the-terrorists/5516295

More evidence of Turkish support for ISIS. Add this to Turkish media footage of MIT (Turk Intel) sponsored trucks shown carrying arms across the border, German News showing trucks and militants crossing the border, and Russian aerial footage of truck convoys carrying oil and other supplies back and forth over the border areas controlled by extremists, plus documented US DIA admissions from 2012 that the outside powers supporting the opposition were aiming to create a Salafist (extremist) State to act as a blocking force against Shiite influence in the region.

The media, when it is not deliberately lying (BBC), is reluctant to cover this story. They have been pushing the narrative that what is happening here is simply an uprising - even though they keep pointing to the large numbers of foreign fighters entering the war zone. They cannot get around the simplistic Bush-esque idea that stopping war comes down to the removal of a 'brutal dictator' requiring Obama-esque 'humanitarian intervention' to support a 'popular uprising'. Peace and Democracy. This worked great for Iraq and Libya (sarcasm). In the meantime hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, and the foreign-backed extremists are running rampant.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 26th, 2016.]

International Military Review – Syria – Iraq, Mar. 23-25 [Updated]






[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 26th, 2016.]

Republicans Spend $520 Million to Stop Trump - Michael Rivero


Has Hillary implemented dirty tricks learned from Nixon? Student debt burden, CNN to censor Trump due to Soros campaign, Fukushima full nuclear melt-downs, sanctions against Russia continue, banking bailout at the expense of the real economy, GMO labels
Guest's website: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 26th, 2016.]

If Donald Trump Is Racist Why Are So Many Minorities Supporting Him




Trump is offering everyone jobs. People of all backgrounds will vote for that.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 26th, 2016.]

G. Edward Griffin: Donald Trump is an Amazing Phenomenon




Related:


G. Edward Griffin - The Creature from Jekyll... by debunkerbuster

DONALD TRUMP IS RIGHT – HERE ARE 100 REASONS WHY WE NEED TO AUDIT THE FEDERAL RESERVE
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 26th, 2016.]

Ralph Nader Slams Bernie Sanders for Endorsing Hillary Clinton


Bernie Sanders choosing to endorse whomever the democratic nominee is will have a tremendous effect on young voters, many of whom will undoubtedly feel disgust and become increasingly cynical which may thereby hurt voter turnout. Nader suggests that followers of Bernie Sanders express themselves, telling him not to endorse Clinton “until she endorse your agenda specifically, not with vague rhetoric”.



Setting himself up to fail?

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 26th, 2016.]

Friday, 25 March 2016

A World War Has Begun: Break the Silence - John Pilger


How many people are aware that a world war has begun? At present, it is a war of propaganda, of lies and distraction, but this can change instantaneously with the first mistaken order, the first missile.

In 2009, President Obama stood before an adoring crowd in the center of Prague, in the heart of Europe. He pledged himself to make "the world free from nuclear weapons." People cheered and some cried. A torrent of platitudes flowed from the media. Obama was subsequently awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

It was all fake. He was lying.

The Obama administration has built more nuclear weapons, more nuclear warheads, more nuclear delivery systems, more nuclear factories. Nuclear warhead spending alone rose higher under Obama than under any American president. The cost over thirty years is more than $1 trillion.

A mini nuclear bomb is planned. It is known as the B61 Model 12. There has never been anything like it. General James Cartwright, a former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has said, "Going smaller [makes using this nuclear]weapon more thinkable."

In the last 18 months, the greatest build-up of military forces since World War Two — led by the United States — is taking place along Russia's western frontier. Not since Hitler invaded the Soviet Union have foreign troops presented such a demonstrable threat to Russia.

Ukraine — once part of the Soviet Union — has become a CIA theme park. Having orchestrated a coup in Kiev, Washington effectively controls a regime that is next door and hostile to Russia: a regime rotten with Nazis, literally. Prominent parliamentary figures in Ukraine are the political descendants of the notorious OUN and UPA fascists. They openly praise Hitler and call for the persecution and expulsion of the Russian speaking minority.

This is seldom news in the West, or it is inverted to suppress the truth.

In Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia — next door to Russia — the U.S. military is deploying combat troops, tanks, heavy weapons. This extreme provocation of the world's second nuclear power is met with silence in the West.

What makes the prospect of nuclear war even more dangerous is a parallel campaign against China.

Seldom a day passes when China is not elevated to the status of a "threat." According to Admiral Harry Harris, the U.S. Pacific commander, China is "building a great wall of sand in the South China Sea."

What he is referring to is China building airstrips in the Spratly Islands, which are the subject of a dispute with the Philippines — a dispute without priority until Washington pressured and bribed the government in Manila and the Pentagon launched a propaganda campaign called "freedom of navigation."

What does this really mean? It means freedom for American warships to patrol and dominate the coastal waters of China. Try to imagine the American reaction if Chinese warships did the same off the coast of California.

I made a film called, "The War You Don't See," in which I interviewed distinguished journalists in America and Britain: reporters such as Dan Rather of CBS, Rageh Omar of the BBC, David Rose of the Observer.

All of them said that had journalists and broadcasters done their job and questioned the propaganda that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction; had the lies of George W. Bush and Tony Blair not been amplified and echoed by journalists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq might not have happened, and hundreds of thousands of men, women and children would be alive today.

The propaganda laying the ground for a war against Russia and/or &China is no different in principle. To my knowledge, no journalist in the Western "mainstream" — a Dan Rather equivalent,say — asks why China is building airstrips in the South China Sea.

The answer ought to be glaringly obvious. The United States is encircling China with a network of bases, with ballistic missiles, battle groups, nuclear-armed bombers.

This lethal arc extends from Australia to the islands of the Pacific, the Marianas and the Marshalls and Guam, to the Philippines, Thailand, Okinawa, Korea and across Eurasia to Afghanistan and India. America has hung a noose around the neck of China. This is not news. Silence by media; war by media.

In 2015, in high secrecy, the U.S. and Australia staged the biggest single air-sea military exercise in recent history, known as Talisman Sabre. Its aim was to rehearse an Air-Sea Battle Plan, blocking sea lanes, such as the Straits of Malacca and the Lombok Straits, that cut off China's access to oil, gas and other vital raw materials from the Middle East and Africa.

In the circus known as the American presidential campaign, Donald Trump is being presented as a lunatic, a fascist. He is certainly odious; but he is also a media hate figure. That alone should arouse our skepticism.

Trump's views on migration are grotesque, but no more grotesque than those of David Cameron. It is not Trump who is the Great Deporter from the United States, but the Nobel Peace Prize winner, Barack Obama.

According to one prodigious liberal commentator, Trump is "unleashing the dark forces of violence" in the United States. Unleashing them?

This is the country where toddlers shoot their mothers and the police wage a murderous war against black Americans. This is the country that has attacked and sought to overthrow more than 50 governments, many of them democracies, and bombed from Asia to the Middle East, causing the deaths and dispossession of millions of people.

No country can equal this systemic record of violence. Most of America's wars (almost all of them against defenseless countries) have been launched not by Republican presidents but by liberal Democrats: Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama.

In 1947, a series of National Security Council directives described the paramount aim of American foreign policy as a world substantially made over in America's own image. The ideology was messianic Americanism. We were all Americans. Or else. Heretics would be converted, subverted, bribed, smeared or crushed.

Donald Trump is a symptom of this, but he is also a maverick. He says the invasion of Iraq was a crime; he doesn't want to go to war with Russia and China. The danger to the rest of us is not Trump, but Hillary Clinton. She is no maverick. She embodies the resilience and violence of a system whose vaunted exceptionalism is totalitarian with an occasional liberal face.

As presidential election day draws near, Clinton will be hailed as the first female president, regardless of her crimes and lies — just as Barack Obama was lauded as the first black president and liberals swallowed his nonsense about "hope." And the drool goes on.
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/A-World-War-Has-Begun-Break-the-Silence-20160322-0022.html

A good read, even if you don't agree with it 100%. Pilger points to the fact that the US has acted like an empire and that during the election cycle the western public falls for what is known as "Identity Politics" - cheerleading for people who are bought-and-paid-for wolves in sheeps clothing. For instance Obama was the first black President, acting as a progressive, while Hillary today, although not so progressive, would be the first female President. Deceptions.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 25th, 2016.]

Denying The Obvious - NIST, Ba┼żant and the 9/11 Debunkers


Examining the official theories for the 9/11 WTC "collapses" and the denials of demolition evidence.



Deliberate disinformation (false explanations) is something most people have no experience with, or only a limited appreciation of. In the case of 911, basic physics and observation debunks the disinformation surrounding the forensic proofs we see in the destruction of the three WTC buildings.

This info packed video is very simple and straightforward. It's a window into what is an obvious cover-up. There is clear evidence of fraud. I am guessing that many people are still confused about what are fundamental facts. If justice had been served we would not have a War on Terror and no bombings in Europe.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 25th, 2016.]

Critics Aghast at ‘Disgusting Speech’ Clinton Just Gave to AIPAC


Palestinian and human rights advocates were aghast over remarks made by Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at the annual American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) convention on Monday, saying that her speech represented “everything that is bad” with U.S. imperialism and policy in the Middle East.
 
During the address, Clinton vowed to take the U.S.-Israel relationship to “the next level”—a level which seemingly includes more war and imperialism, few, if any, rights for Palestinians, and definitely no economic boycotts of Israel.
 
Striking a hawkish tone, Clinton warned the powerful lobby group against rival candidates who want to “outsource Middle East security to dictators” and “cede the mantle of leadership for global peace and security,” and instead vowed even more “security and intelligence cooperation.”
 
“As president, I will make a firm commitment to ensure Israel maintains its qualitative military edge,” she said. “The United States should provide Israel with the most sophisticated defense technology so it can deter and stop any threats. That includes bolstering Israeli missile defenses with new systems like the Arrow Three and David’s Sling. And we should work together to develop better tunnel detection, technology to prevent armed smuggling, kidnapping and terrorist attacks.”
 
As observers noted, as she ran down the list of “evolving threats,” the former U.S. secretary of state resorted to common neoconservative talking points, declaring:
As we gather here, three evolving threats — Iran’s continued aggression, a rising tide of extremism across a wide arc of instability, and the growing effort to de-legitimize Israel on the world stage — are converging to make the U.S.-Israel alliance more indispensable than ever.
We have to combat all these trends with even more intense security and diplomatic cooperation. The United States and Israel must be closer than ever, stronger than ever and more determined than ever to prevail against our common adversaries and to advance our shared values.
Touting her “deep, personal commitment” to the “Jewish state,” Clinton then said that “one of the first things I’ll do in office is invite Israeli Prime Minister [Benjamin Netanyahu] to visit the White House.”
 
The speech proved that, on matters of Israel, Clinton is “running to the right” of GOP front-runner Donald Trump, as noted by Mondoweiss‘ Philip Weiss, who wrote that the remarks were “filled with red meat for Israel supporters” and “contained scant reference to the peace process.”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/critics-aghast-at-disgusting-speech-clinton-just-gave-to-aipac/5515735

Related Info:

Hillary Clinton: Destroy Syria for Israel: “The Best Way to Help Israel”
A newly-released Hilary Clinton email confirmed that the Obama administration has deliberately provoked the civil war in Syria as the “best way to help Israel.”
In an indication of her murderous and psychopathic nature, Clinton also wrote that it was the “right thing” to personally threaten Bashar Assad’s family with death.
In the email, released by Wikileaks, then Secretary of State Clinton says that the “best way to help Israel” is to “use force” in Syria to overthrow the government.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-destroy-syria-for-israel-the-best-way-to-help-israel/5515741

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 25th, 2016.]

Donald Trump is LITERALLY Hitler



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 25th, 2016.]

SEX! DRUGS! MURDER! The Secret Lives of Hillary (and Bill) Clinton w/ Victor Thorn



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 25th, 2016.]

Black Trump Backer Says Open Borders Are Crushing Black Employment


A black Donald Trump supporter told Breitbart News that a border wall was necessary to get black Americans back into work, citing Harlem’s construction industry



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 25th, 2016.]

Thursday, 24 March 2016

Is the ISIS Behind the Brussels Attacks? Who is Behind the ISIS?


Dramatic loss of life in the terror attacks in Brussels: 34 killed and more than 180 wounded according to the latest reports.

Prior to the conduct of a police investigation, in the hours following the attacks, the Western media went into overdrive, intimating without evidence that the Islamic State (ISIS) operating out of Raqqa, Northern Syria was responsible for the attacks.

According to the Independent “Isis supporters have been celebrating the Brussels attacks online [social media] as speculation mounts that the group is behind a wave of deadly attacks in the Belgian capital.”
-----------------------------------------------
The events in Brussels raises the broader question: who is behind the ISIS?

Israel intelligence sources (DEBKA) in a 2011 report confirmed the role of NATO operating out of its Brussels headquarters and Turkey’s high command in the training and recruitment of terrorists:
NATO headquarters in Brussels and the Turkish high command are meanwhile drawing up plans for their first military step in Syria, which is to arm the rebels with weapons for combating the tanks and helicopters spearheading the Assad regime’s crackdown on dissent. … NATO strategists are thinking more in terms of pouring large quantities of anti-tank and anti-air rockets, mortars and heavy machine guns into the protest centers for beating back the government armored forces. (DEBKAfile, NATO to give rebels anti-tank weapons, August 14, 2011)
This initiative, which was also supported by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, involved a process of organized recruitment of thousands of jihadist “freedom fighters”, reminiscent of the enlistment of Mujahideen to wage the CIA’s jihad (holy war) in the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war:
Also discussed in Brussels and Ankara, our sources report, is a campaign to enlist thousands of Muslim volunteers in Middle East countries and the Muslim world to fight alongside the Syrian rebels. The Turkish army would house these volunteers, train them and secure their passage into Syria. (Ibid, emphasis added)
These mercenaries were subsequently integrated into US and allied sponsored terrorist organizations including Al Nusrah and ISIS.

And then in August 2014, Obama launched his counter-terrorism campaign. Yet the evidence confirms that instead of destroying the ISIS, the US and its allies including Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Israel were in fact protecting the ISIS.

Again according to the Daily Mirror in a 2015 report, the counterterrorism campaign was conducive to ISIS doubling the territory under its control, until the launching of the Russian intervention in late September 2015.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/is-the-isis-behind-the-brussels-attacks-who-is-behind-the-isis/5515765


Related Info:

The Covert Origins of ISIS


Veteran Middle East journalist Robert Fisks Explains Saudi-Turkish support for ISIS and US facilitation of the Proxy War in Syria


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 24th, 2016.]

Hillary Clinton Is The Chaos Candidate


Political Analyst Syrian Girl joins Paul Joseph Watson to discuss Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and the ongoing crisis in Syria.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 24th, 2016.]

African American Police Officer Talks about 'Hateful Evil' Anti-Donald Trump Protesters


": The media is corrupt! We The People are fighting with you."

Tucson Police Officer Brandon Tatum talks about his experience at Saturday's Trump rally in Tucson, AZ (3/19/2016).


African American Police Officer Talks about... by debunkerbuster

Related:

Soros and Obama Activate Terror Cells For Race War


Donald Trump a Racist?


TUCSON COP: ANTI-TRUMP PROTESTERS “MOST HATEFUL PEOPLE I’VE EVER SEEN”

Police Officer Shares his Experience at Trump Rally:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXZUpNNNgzU

Anti-Trump Liberal Protester In KKK Hood Gets Beat Up By Pro-Trump Black Guy! LOL!:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0f_s6KCud1k100%

Proof That Donald Trump Does Not Incite Violence at His Rallies:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3aLLegn75g

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, March 24th, 2016.]