The 911 kook movement has done more damage to the truth of 911 then the government's official story. I never have a problem getting people to accept the government is lying, what I have a problem with is people associating the only alternative to 911 officialdom as being a bunch of nonsensical kook propaganda namely a missile hitting the pentagon or worst yet no planes at all or generic groups like the illuminati etc not the FBI CIA or Mossad which actually exist and of which there is evidence for being involved.
Dawson is talking about the 'disinformation kooks' who are poisoning the well by pushing outlandish, and baseless theories, as opposed to the disinfo trolls that are defending the official story. One thing is for sure, this whole process is slowly but surely providing a great education for many people - teaching them to be independent thinkers!
Dawson's summation is worth reflecting upon. We must look at the data and the players involved, whilst being prepared to play devil's advocate, and ditch hypotheses that have a low chance of being correct. The Pentagon missile theory makes little sense considering the wreckage and damage to the building. The most likely hyopthesis, one that accounts for the majority of the crime scene observations, would favour using a large airliner as the weapon.
For the best empirical evidence that seals the 911 truth argument, consider the work of the Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth who focus on the scientific evidence associated with the World Trade Centre demolitions:
For information regarding those actually involved in 911 murders (as opposed to the official story) look for other material put out by Ryan Dawson and also Kevin Ryan (Google it).
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, August 22nd, 2012.]