Tuesday, 31 May 2011

The Stage Is Set For a NUCLEAR FALSE FLAG Attack.

Bob Tuskin goes over parts of our recent article - The Stage Is Set For Nuclear False Flag. Please read the full article there are MANY more examples and videos in the article including Jericho and Operation Blackjack.

The Stage Is Set For a Nuclear False Flag
http://theintelhub.com/2011/05/29/the-stage-is-set-for-a-nuclear-false-flag/



Other vital links from the featured You Tube page include:

Agencies' Lack of Coordination Hindered Supply of Crucial Gas, Report Sayshttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/us/29helium.html?_r=2&hp

Letters Claim Al-CIAda Has Nuclear Bombs Hidden Across United States http://theintelhub.com/2011/03/30/letters-claim-al-ciada-have-nuclear-bombs-h...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-B_zkZYNy8&feature=player_embedded

The Single Biggest Threat To U.S. Security http://www.politico.com/politico44/perm/0410/the_single_biggest_threat_to_u_s...

Nuclear Forensics: A Capability at Risk. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12966

Does al-Qaida have 20 suitcase nukes? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=15377

Missing Nukes: Treason of the Highest Order http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7158


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 31st, 2011.]

Monday, 30 May 2011

Essential Fukushima Update: Linda Moulton Howe on Coast-to-Coast

Looking into the Fukushima nuclear plant problems, she reported that plutonium reactor fuel had been ejected from Unit 3, and that radioactive hazards were accumulating in marine life off the coast of Japan She spoke with security consultant Scott Portzline who outlined the continuing problems at Fukushima-- the nuclear plants are still leaking, and it's fissioning at Unit 3. Further, Linda warned, the emergency vents at Fukushima that were supposed to prevent hydrogen explosions did not work - and the same exact vent systems are in American nuclear reactors.






[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 30th, 2011.]

Sunday, 29 May 2011

Amid Health Fears, Diet Drink* Sweetener in Safety Spotlight

An artificial sweetener used in Diet Drinks* is to undergo an urgent EU safety review.
Aspartame is ingested every day by millions of people around the world in more than 6,000 well-known brands of food, drink and medicine.
However, it has been the subject of a number of studies that appear to show harmful effects on human health.
One recent study linked diet drinks containing aspartame to premature births, while another suggested it could cause cancer.

To date, health watchdogs, including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the UK’s Food Standards Agency (FSA), have ruled out any link to ill-health.

But after several MEPs asked for a new investigation following pressure from European health campaigners, EU Commission officials have now asked the EFSA to bring forward a review that had been planned for 2020.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1391395/Amid-health-fears-Diet-Coke-sweetner-safety-spotlight.html

Early studies of this substance showed it to be harmful to animals and it was originally banned. Please check out the following:



If you have more time check out this documentary:



*Please note: In posting this article from the Dailymail I altered this word from a company name to something more generic. The aspartame is used in a lot of diet products put out by many different corporations.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 29th, 2011.]

5 Reasons High Fructose Corn Syrup Will Kill You

Here are 5 reasons you should stay way from any product containing high fructose corn syrup and why it may kill you.

1. Sugar in any form causes obesity and disease when consumed in pharmacologic doses.

Cane sugar and high fructose corn syrup are indeed both harmful when consumed in pharmacologic doses of 140 pounds per person per year. When one 20 ounce HFCS sweetened soda, sports drink or tea has 17 teaspoons of sugar (and the average teenager often consumes two drinks a day) we are conducting a largely uncontrolled experiment on the human species. Our hunter gather ancestors consumed the equivalent of 20 teaspoons per year, not per day. In this sense, I would agree with the corn industry that sugar is sugar. Quantity matters. But there are some important differences.

2. HFCS and cane sugar are NOT biochemically identical or processed the same way by the body.

High fructose corn syrup is an industrial food product and far from “natural” or a naturally occurring substance. It is extracted from corn stalks through a process so secret that Archer Daniels Midland and Carghill would not allow the investigative journalist, Michael Pollan to observe it for his book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma. The sugars are extracted through a chemical enzymatic process resulting in a chemically and biologically novel compound called HFCS.

Some basic biochemistry will help you understand this. Regular cane sugar (sucrose) is made of two-sugar molecules bound tightly together – glucose and fructose in equal amounts. The enzymes in your digestive tract must break down the sucrose into glucose and fructose, which are then absorbed into the body.

HFCS also consists of glucose and fructose, not in a 50-50 ratio, but a 55-45 fructose to glucose ratio in an unbound form. Fructose is sweeter than glucose. And HCFS is cheaper than sugar because of the government farm bill corn subsidies. Products with HFCS are sweeter and cheaper than products made with cane sugar. This allowed for the average soda size to balloon from 8 ounces to 20 ounces with little financial costs to manufacturers but great human costs of increased obesity, diabetes and chronic disease.

Now back to biochemistry. Since there is there is no chemical bond between them, no digestion is required so they are more rapidly absorbed into your blood stream. Fructose goes right to the liver and triggers lipogenesis (the production of fats like triglycerides and cholesterol) this is why it is the major cause of liver damage in this country and causes a condition called “fatty liver” which affects 70 million people. The rapidly absorbed glucose triggers big spikes in insulin – our body’s major fat storage hormone. Both these features of HFCS lead to increased metabolic disturbances that drive increases in appetite, weight gain, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, dementia and more.
------------------------------------
3. HFCS contains contaminants including mercury that are not regulated or measured by the FDA

An FDA researcher asked corn producers to ship a barrel of high fructose corn syrup in order to test for contaminants. Her repeated requests were refused until she claimed she represented a newly created soft drink company. She was then promptly shipped a big vat of HFCS that was used as part of the study that showed that HFCS often contains toxic levels of mercury because of chlor-alkali products used in its manufacturing.(i) Poisoned sugar is certainly not “natural”.

When HFCS is run through a chemical analyzer or a chromatograph, strange chemical peaks show up that are not glucose or fructose. What are they? Who knows? This certainly calls into question the purity of this processed form of super sugar. The exact nature, effects and toxicity of these funny compounds have not been fully explained, but shouldn’t we be protected from the presence of untested chemical compounds in our food supply, especially when the contaminated food product comprises up to 15-20 percent of the average American’s daily calorie intake?

http://drhyman.com/5-reasons-high-fructose-corn-syrup-will-kill-you-5050/?utm_source=Publicaster&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=drhyman%20newsletter%20issue%20#20&utm_term=Get%20the%20story

Methinks our food has been "poisoned" to make us unhealthy and stupid.

We desperately need to have a revolution so that the big corporations are no longer in control.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 29th, 2011.]

Saturday, 28 May 2011

Is Fukushima Now Ten Chernobyls into the Sea?

New readings show levels of radioisotopes found up to 30 kilometers offshore from the on-going crisis at Fukushima are ten times higher than those measured in the Baltic and Black Seas during Chernobyl.

"When it comes to the oceans, says Ken Buesseler, a chemical oceonographer at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, "the impact of Fukushima exceeds Chernobyl."

The news comes amidst a tsunami of devastating revelations about the Fukushima disaster and the crumbling future of atomic power, along with a critical Senate funding vote today:

Fukushima's owner, the Tokyo Electric Power Company, has confirmed that fuel at Unit One melted BEFORE the arrival of the March 11 tsunami.

This critical revelation confirms that the early stages of that melt-down were set in motion by the earthquake that sent tremors into Japan from a relatively far distance out to sea.

Virtually all of Japan's 55 reactors sit on or near earthquake faults. A 2007 earthquake forced seven reactors to shut at Kashiwazaki. Japan has ordered shut at least two more at Hamaoka because of their seismic vulnerability.

http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/7/2011/1888


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 28th, 2011.]

Keiser Report (E150): Gold Stands Rock Hard

This week Max Keiser and co-host, Stacy Herbert, report on American anger at gas prices, Middle East fears on wheat prices and the Chinese love for gold that has double in a year. In the second half of the show, Max talks to investment adviser, Ned Naylor-Leyland of Cheviot Asset Management in London, about thousand ounce silver bars and the precious metals market.



Another fantastic episode.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 28th, 2011.]

The 25 Rules of Disinformation

Originally posted by VC at The Vigiliant Citizen, who writes:

From Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation (Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist) by H. Michael Sweeney. These 25 rules are everywhere in media, from political debates, to television shows, to comments on a blog..
____________________________________
1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.

7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact
. [ie. The media/authorities would have reported facts like this, therefore the facts raised cannot exist or be credible. -Spook]

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”.

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.

22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.

25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.

___________________________________


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 28th, 2011.]

Friday, 27 May 2011

The Last Word On Osama bin Laden



After video of what the Pentagon alleged was Osama bin Laden confessing to the 9/11 attacks emerged in December 2001, a German national news program conducted its own investigation into the tape. According to its own, independent translators, every single point in the video that the Pentagon alleges indicate Osama’s foreknowledge or complicity in the 9/11 attack has been mistranslated, and the video does not in fact provide any proof of confession.

Famously, FBI spokesman Rex Tomb told investigative journalist Ed Haas that the FBI did not include 9/11 on bin Laden’s “most wanted” profile because there was no hard evidence connecting him to the crime.
------------------------------------------
What emerges from the official Osama bin Laden story is not a person but a comic book villain, a faceless, mysterious, motivationless embodiment of “terrorism” with all the reality of a Lex Luther or Cobra Commander. His is a powerful myth, made all the more powerful because it has been constructed and promoted by the very politicians and string-pullers who claim to be opposing him.

Like Orwell’s Emmanuel Goldstein, his face can be put before the public from time to time to produce the Two Minute Hate, a cathartic projection of anger upon an empty image. We know to hiss when his picture is dangled before us and cheer when we are told he is dead. But always, always, it is stressed that he is fearsome, that he is ruthless, and that the only way to stop him is to surrender our rights and freedoms. Even in death, we are told, he and the mythical army of devotees he supposedly ruled over, are a clear and present danger to our society necessitating the continuation of the neverending wars against abstract nouns, TSA agents groping children at the airports and extra-judicial no-fly lists that are turning in to no-ride lists and no-buy lists.

The only thing we can say for certain is that the Osama bin Laden character has now been disposed of in a far-fetched burial story only fitting of his cartoonish myth. And now the public is already being prepared for his replacement myths, a gaggle of similarly cartoonish characters no less connected to the Western intelligence establishment than Osama himself.

http://www.infowars.com/the-last-word-on-osama-bin-laden/


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 27th, 2011.]

Keiser Report (E149): Savers vs Speculators

This week Max Keiser and co-host, Stacy Herbert, report on color-coded prostitutes for Munich Re, financial repression for the U.S.A. and a New World Order of growth accelerated exploding watermelons for China. In the second half of the show, Max talks to a former banker at Goldman Sachs and Bear Stearns, Nomi Prins (author of It Takes a Pillage) about Matt Taibbis The People versus Goldman Sachs and about the IMF.



A very good episode to check out.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 27th, 2011.]

19 Scientific Studies Link GMOs to Organ Disruption

Purpose:
We reviewed 19 studies of mammals fed with commercialized genetically modified soybean and maize which represent, per trait and plant, more than 80% of all environmental genetically modified organisms (GMOs) cultivated on a large scale, after they were modified to tolerate or produce a pesticide. We have also obtained the raw data of 90-day-long rat tests following court actions or official requests. The data obtained include biochemical blood and urine parameters of mammals eating GMOs with numerous organ weights and histopathology findings.

Methods:
We have thoroughly reviewed these tests from a statistical and a biological point of view. Some of these tests used controversial protocols which are discussed and statistically significant results that were considered as not being biologically meaningful by regulatory authorities, thus raising the question of their interpretations.

Results:
Several convergent data appear to indicate liver and kidney problems as end points of GMO diet effects in the above-mentioned experiments. This was confirmed by our meta-analysis of all the in vivo studies published, which revealed that the kidneys were particularly affected, concentrating 43.5% of all disrupted parameters in males, whereas the liver was more specifically disrupted in females (30.8% of all disrupted parameters).

Conclusions:
The 90-day-long tests are insufficient to evaluate chronic toxicity, and the signs highlighted in the kidneys and livers could be the onset of chronic diseases. However, no minimal length for the tests is yet obligatory for any of the GMOs cultivated on a large scale, and this is socially unacceptable in terms of consumer health protection. We are suggesting that the studies should be improved and prolonged, as well as being made compulsory, and that the sexual hormones should be assessed too, and moreover, reproductive and multigenerational studies ought to be conducted too.

http://www.enveurope.com/content/23/1/10


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 27th, 2011.]

Thursday, 26 May 2011

70 000 Must Evacuate Around Fukushima

Seventy thousand people living beyond the 20km no-go zone around Fukushima should be evacuated because of radioactivity deposited by the crippled nuclear plant, a watchdog said.

Updating its assessment of the March 11 disaster, France's Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) highlighted an area northwest of the plant that lies beyond the 20km zone whose inhabitants have already been evacuated.

Radioactivity levels in this area range from several hundred becquerels per square metre to thousands or even several million bequerels per square metre, the IRSN report, issued late on Monday, said.

Around 70 000 people, including 9 500 children aged up to 14, live in the area, "the most contaminated territory outside the evacuation zone", the agency said.
http://www.news24.com/World/News/70-000-must-evacuate-around-Fukushima-20110524

The biggest problem with the radiation outside the plant is what's causing it. The radiation is caused by tiny particles that have spread out across the land. The serious health issue occurs when these particles are ingested via food, water or inhalation - whereafter internal damage to cells is increased thanks to the close proximity of the contaminant.

It is possible that a huge area, encompassing Tokyo, should be considered dangerous for human habitation. Recently high levels of radiation were reported as coming from sewage plants in the area.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 26th, 2011.]

The Implications of the Fukushima Accident on the World's Operating Reactors

Arnie Gundersen reports that the Fukushima disaster began before the tsunami hit: when reactor 1 began to meltdown and when the fuel pool at reactor 4 cracked and started leaking before the water hit.



The world's nuclear reactors are ticking timebombs.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 26th, 2011.]

The Real Reason(?) for NATO Attacking Libya EXPOSED

Some believe it is about protecting civilians, others say it is about oil, but some are convinced intervention in Libya is all about Gaddafi's plan to introduce the gold dinar, a single African currency made from gold, a true sharing of the wealth.




[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 26th, 2011.]

Wednesday, 25 May 2011

RECAP: FireFighter Erik Lawyer Slams NIST And The 9/11 "Investigation"



A great video in which Lawyer goes through the fire investigation guidelines that the NIST investigators more or less ignored.

(thanks to Michael G for the vid !)

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 25th, 2011.]

'US lawmakers forced to support Israel' - Cynthia McKinney on PressTV

McKinney said that if a candidate does not sign the pledge or perform accordingly, "then you do not get money to run your campaign."



This helps to explain why the Israeli PM got such huge support via applause and repeated standing ovations in his recent address to Congress.

And vote 1 for McKinney ! She's running for Congress once more.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 25th, 2011.]

Is Big Pharma Ignoring a Potential Cancer Cure?

One of Salk's admirers is Evangelos Michelakis, a cancer researcher at the University of Alberta who, three years ago, discovered that a common, nontoxic chemical known as DCA, short for dichloroacetate, seems to inhibit the growth of cancerous tumors in mice. Michelakis' initial findings garnered much fanfare at the time and have recirculated on the Web again this week, in large part because of a blog post ("Scientists cure cancer, but no one takes notice") that ignited fresh debate with people wondering if it was true.

The mechanism by which DCA works in mice is remarkably simple: It killed most types of cancer cells by disrupting the way they metabolize sugar, causing them to self-destruct without adversely affecting normal tissues.

Following the animal trials, Michelakis and his colleagues did tests of DCA on human cancer cells in a Petri dish, then conducted human clinical trials using $1.5 million in privately raised funds. His encouraging results — DCA treatment appeared to extend the lives of four of the five study participants — were published last year in Science Translational Medicine.

The preliminary work in rodents, cell cultures, and small trials on humans points to DCA as being a powerful cancer treatment. That doesn't mean it's the long-awaited cure — many other compounds have seemed similarly promising in the early stages of research without later living up to that promise — but nonetheless, Michelakis believes larger human trials on DCA are warranted.

Like Jonas Salk, Michelakis hasn't patented his discovery. It's not because he doesn't want to, but because he can't. When it comes to patents, DCA really is like the sun: It's a cheap, widely used chemical that no one can own.

In today's world, such drugs don't readily attract funding.

Pharmaceutical companies are not exactly ignoring DCA, and they definitely aren't suppressing DCA research — it's just that they're not helping it. Why? Drug development is ultimately a business, and investing in the drug simply isn't a good business move. "Big Pharma has no interest whatsoever in investing [in DCA research] because there will be no profit," Michelakis told Life's Little Mysteries,a sister site to LiveScience.
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/05/18/big-pharma-ignoring-potential-cancer-cure/#ixzz1MmRjUm5i


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 25th, 2011.]

Tuesday, 24 May 2011

Global Financial Crisis-On the Edge with Max Keiser

In this edition of On the Edge, Max Keiser interviews Dr, Paul Craig Roberts from Georgia who is an American economist, columnist for Creators Syndicate, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in Reagan Administration and a former editor of the Wall Street Journal.





In the second half Roberts helps explain why the overall US economy is such a basket case today. If you are not aware of the causes of US debt and poverty then please watch.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 24th, 2011.]

7/7 Bomb Damage Does Not Match Official Story ...



If the bomb was in a rucksack sitting on the floor the question is; why are the railings inside the carriage bent upwards ? Also where are the pics of the holes themselves ? We must have questions about this sort of thing when we know the official story about the train time tables is false: http://julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-luton-kings-cross-train-times.html

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 24th, 2011.]

Spain Adopts Iceland’s Kitchenware Revolution Idea

Icelandic ripples have spread to Spain in the form of thousands of angry young people gathering in the country’s biggest cities since the 15th May, the paper reports. “Spain rise up — be the second Iceland” and “Our role model — Iceland” are chants being used by the protesters.

El Pais states that Icelanders managed to topple their government and hound the bankers who led the economy to ruin with an ongoing investigation. As well as that, the paper says, they rejected the Icesave repayment contract — and better still, they have also set up a constitutional council to update the national constitution.
http://www.icenews.is/index.php/2011/05/21/spain-adopts-icelands-kitchenware-revolution-idea/


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 24th, 2011.]

Monday, 23 May 2011

RECAP: 7/7 Mind the Gap

Documentary detailing the gaps in the official story of the 7/7 London Bombings that demand further attention. This film, presented by ex-Mi5 whistleblower David Shayler, argues the need for an Independant Public Inquiry into 7/7 and the surrounding events.


Part 1. Part 2. Part 3. Part 4.

This excellent documentary deals with the London 7/7 bombings and opens with a rundown of the lies that started the Iraq war, a brief review of the 911 false flag terror attacks and the involvement of Western intelligence services in past incidents.

Most people don't realise there are HUGE problems with the official story about the 7/7 bombings. For anyone who has bothered to look at the evidence, it becomes clear tha the official narrative is highly suspect and completely false with regard to certain critical aspects of the story. This documentary is highly recommended viewing.

Remember, the threat of false flag terror attack will always be with us until these crimes are fully exposed and justice served.


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 23rd, 2011.]

The 7/7 Train Times from Luton to King's Cross Disprove the Official Story

The well-known picture of the four ‘bombers’ entering Luton station on the morning of July 7th was released by the police on July 16th. It apparently shows them catching the 7.40am train, as they announced at the press conference.

The image is time and date-stamped as 07.21:54, a few seconds shy of 7.22am.

The police had earlier inspected CCTV pictures of them at King’s Cross mainline station at 8.26 am, or so we were told. The Luton to King’s Cross Thameslink service normally takes 36 minutes, and so the 7.40am from Luton would usually arrive into King’s Cross at 8.16am. This would have fitted in neatly with these two timed CCTV images given out by the police.
-----------------------------------------
It turned out however that all trains were severely delayed on July 7th, due to problems with overhead lines in the Mill Hill Area.

These facts only emerged weeks after the event, when two researchers visited Luton station on the morning of 23rd August, and conducted on-platform interviews with commuters.

Computer records of the train timetables were kindly made available both by Marie Bernes at Customer Relations at King's Cross, and from Chris Hudson, Communications Manager of Thameslink Rail, at Luton station.

That gave the following Luton to King's Cross timetable for the morning of July 7th:



It is evident from this table, that this 07.48 train did not arrive in King’s Cross until after the two of the underground trains involved had already departed King's Cross underground station.

Was any train feasible? Let us consider an earlier train, which left Luton station at 07.25, and arrived into King’s Cross Thameslink at 08.23 am; thus, its journey took 58 minutes. This scenario would give the four young men barely three minutes to walk up the stairs at Luton, buy their tickets in the morning rush-hour and then get to the platform. Some have suggested that Lindsay German from Aylesbury had arrived early and bought the four tickets in advance (day-returns at 22 pounds each), to make this feasible. But, from King’s Cross Thameslink, it takes a good seven minutes to walk through the long, Underground tube passage which includes a ticket barrier, to reach the main King’s Cross station, in the morning rush-hour with large rucksacks – in no way could they have been captured on the 08.26am alleged CCTV picture.

Thus, no train that morning is capable of getting a passenger into both of the CCTV images. This could be part of the reason why the police can never release the images they claim to have, of the four at King’s Cross.

This major breakdown of the official story came about through the testimony of a commuter who wished to remain anonymous: she arrived at Luton station that morning at 7.25am, and testified that she had no train to catch until 7.58am, because the 7.30am and 7.40am trains from Luton were cancelled on July 7th. She could only get a slow train at 7.58am from platform 3 to King's Cross, which didn't arrive there until 8.43am. It was so packed that many could not get onto the train at Luton*. (The 07.30 was delayed in arriving into Luton that morning and came into platform 4, whereas the London trains normally come to platforms 1 or 3, which is why she believed it had been cancelled.)

http://julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-luton-kings-cross-train-times.html

The official story, as it stands, MUST be false.

And with terror drills at the exact same time and place as the real bombings, with the bombers buying return tickets and arguing with shopkeepers, plus indications the bombs themselves had been planted under the trains, this all makes for a very weak official account.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 23rd, 2011.]

Sunday, 22 May 2011

Attack on Iran Imminent With Accusation of 9/11 Role? [PROPAGANDA ALERT]

Sourced from Activist Post:

Editor's Note: Zen Gardner, Before It's News. This is all according to the PNAC script. Guess they figure the American sheeple are dumbed down enough to where they can get away with any nonsense they want to throw out there. They never even proved Bin Laden had anything to do with 9/11, never mind prove Iraq had anything to do with it yet they've decimated two whole countries, are invading others, and now want to take on Iran. China won't stand idly by. These insane boys are itching for a big fight and it's all deliberate. Stay vigilant and prepared. -Z)

Iran accused of September 11 Role
Benjamin Weiser, Scott ShaneThe Sydney Morning Herald

Two defectors from Iran's intelligence service have testified that Iranian officials knew in advance about the attacks of September 11, 2001, says a US court filing that seeks damages for Iran's ''direct support for, and sponsorship of, the most deadly act of terrorism in American history''.

One of the defectors also claimed that Iran was involved in designing the attacks, the filing said. The defectors' identities and testimony were not revealed in the filing but were being submitted to a judge under seal, said lawyers who brought the original suit against Iran on behalf of families of dozens of September 11 victims.

The suit says Iran and Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant group with close ties to Tehran, helped al-Qaeda with planning the attacks and with the hijackers' training and travel. After the attacks, the suit says, Iran and Hezbollah helped al-Qaeda operatives and their families to escape, in some cases providing them with a safe haven in Iran.

Full Story here.

------------------------------------------------------------

This is out-and-out propaganda designed to speed the case for a bombing of Iran. I would wager that none of the claims being made here are true.

Remember, if you pay people enough money, extort them, torture them, or threaten their family, then they'll likely confess to anything. Also, confessions are not proof of guilt either unless they reveal information that can be independently confirmed.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 22nd, 2011.]

White House Running Scared Over Latest Discovery of Obama's True Origins

Alex talks with author and investigative journalist Jerome Corsi about the Obama birth certificate fiasco. Corsi is the author of Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President.





Part 2 Part 3

This whole thing is a distraction from Obama's criminal actions, like the cover-up of Bush era war crimes, the expanded war into Pakistan, the continuation of indefinite detention, lying about the Gulf of Mexico disaster etc etc.

Nevertheless the lies being told here by Obama's people point to a US system where cover-ups are the order of the day. (As a matter of interest Obama's real father appears to be Frank Marshall Davis.)

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 22nd, 2011.]

UPDATE: Architects and Engineers For 911 Truth- More than 1500* Building Experts say 911 was an Inside Job

http://www.ae911truth.org/
More than ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED experts now say that the attacks on the World Trade Centre Towers (and Building 7) were an inside job.

The reason for such a position is clear: there is overwhelming forensic evidence that demonstrates explosives MUST have been used on the buildings.

The official lies about 911 cannot be allowed to stand. Exposing the truth is necessary to stop any further staged attacks that could be used as a pretext to clamp down on civil liberties or as a justification for a new War versus countries such as Iran. We live in dangerous times and we need experts like these to help fight against the lies.

Go to the AE911truth website and sign their petition. Become a sustaining member and donate money to further their operations. Use PayPal and give 10 dollars a month (or more if you can afford it). Don't let the criminals win.

The analysis provided by these Architects and Engineers MUST be used by honourable Law Enforcement, Judicial and Military persons in actions against the real suspects. Don't let the perpetrators of 911 go unpunished. Spread the word about September 11 being an inside job !

As cliche as this sounds, we ARE all in this together. The only way to stop the threat of terrorism and to end the foreign wars is to stand up and be heard. Nothing good will happen if we all remain silent.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 22nd, 2011.]

Saturday, 21 May 2011

Fukushima Update: 3 Reactors Melted Down, Radiation Increases, US Complicity in Stateside Contamination Coverup



Remember there is fallout happening across the Northern Pacific and the US Government, via the EPA and FDA, is keeping people in the dark.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 21st, 2011.]

Keiser Report (E148): Suicide Banking

This time Max Keiser and co-host, Stacy Herbert, report on staging bomb blasts to unravel financial markets while Zimbabwe proposes a gold backed currency. In the second half of the show, Max talks to Gregor Macdonald of Gregor.us about paper versus real as future growth prospects dim on declining energy resources.



In the second half of the show they talk about people remaining poor because of the high price of oil. New technology is the real hope here. Power stations that do not use petroleum or "fossil fuel" products plus cars running on water, or some other power source, will change the game.

The prospects for the future are bright if we can overcome the present system that is supported by politicians who are under the influence of the global "military industrial complex" mindset. Yes, many politicians push for a "green" future, but their scope of action is, in many cases, constrained via present business (market) interests and the limitation of their own knowledge (imagination) when it comes to thinking outside of the box.


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 21st, 2011.]

Friday, 20 May 2011

New "Al Qaeda" Leader: Evidence Suggests al-Adel Figure is Another Intelligence Ghost.

In July 2010, journalist Camille Tawil of the leading daily pan-Arab newspaper Al-Hayat published a report detailing two letters that had been sent purportedly by Muhammad Ibrahim Makkawi, via a third party, to the newspaper.

In the letters, which were also sent to the UN in Pakistan, the man claiming to be Makkawi, outlined in detail that he has no connection to al Qaeda and that his identity is being used synonymously by Western intelligence with the Saif al-Adel figure.

Camille Tawil’s report can be found on the Al Hayat website here. Translating them into English via the web browser reveals some interesting details.

Makkawi, who claims to live in Islamabad, says he fled Egypt after being linked to the attempt to topple the government there in the late 80s. In the letters he says that in 2005 he requested that US authorities receive him and allow him access to a fair trial, following the assertions that he was involved with al Qaeda.

Makkawi wrote that for years after 9/11 the US and Pakistan, which he describes as “puppets in her hand”, as well as al Qaeda and even Iran, pressured him to work with them to “maximize the alleged role the sword of justice, (Saif al-Adel) ” and to be “used as a tool and a client” in the so called war against terrorism.
---------------------------------------------------
Makkawi also wrote that since he refused to “accept the counterfeit identity of the al Qaeda number 3, and the big lie of September 11th”, there have been attempts on his life and the lives of his family. He contends that his name is now “being exploited for hidden motives”.

He also says he has requested aid from the Qatari authorities, and from Saudi Arabia, but has received no response.

The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), an organisation riddled with neocons, responded to the publication of this information by writing:

“The strange letters make clear that Makkawi is a 9/11 conspiracy theorist, and that he likewise believes that the U.S., Iran, and others have been trying to force him to assume the identity of Saif Al-’Adl for nefarious ends…”

Camille Tawil is no conspiracy theorist, however. Rather he is a respected investigative journalist and expert on Arab Jihadists, having had first hand contact with many key players. This gives the report legitimacy and raises some extremely weighty questions.

In October 2010, Spiegal published a report claiming that al-Adel/Makkawi had suddenly reappeared in Waziristan, in the border area between Pakistan and Afghanistan, and was “operating as al-Qaida’s military chief”. The source of this information was… you guessed it, Noman Benotman. The same Western backed source who now claims that al-Adel/Makkawi has become the leader of al Qaeda.
http://www.infowars.com/new-al-qaeda-leader-claims-he-has-nothing-to-do-with-al-qaeda/


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 20th, 2011.]

They REALLY oughta know better

By Adam T at Debunking the Debunkers blog.

Critiques of claims made by several prominent and semi-prominent 9/11 debunkers


-Joseph Nobles/boloboffin of AE911Truth.INFO-

Joseph Nobles’ claims about “free fall” shown to be false.

Mr. Nobles attempts to refute NASA engineer Dwain Deet’s website 7problemswithbuilding7.
I show his claims to be false and misleading.

My critique of Mr. Nobles’ “The Big Three: Parts 1, 2 and 3.”

Mr. Nobles claims that other skyscraper fires are not comparable to the Twin Towers and Building 7.
I show this assertion to be false.

My take on Mr. Nobles’ claims about thermal conductivity and the eutectic steel.

Mr. Nobles responds to my many refutations of his claims. I respond back
here, here, and here.

Joseph Nobles criticizes AE911Truth and Tom Sullivan's credentials.
Darcy Wearing and John-Michael Talboo respond.

My thoughts on Joseph Nobles' criticisms of the BuildingWhat? site.

Nobles claims that that the explosion in the 'Seven’s Exploding' video is fake.
John-Michael Talboo shows otherwise.


-Mark "Gravy" Roberts-

My extensive critique of Mark Roberts’ video “WTC Not a Demolition.”

Honest mistakes are apparently “big news” to Mark Roberts.

Mark Roberts: 9/11 "Debunker" or just Dishonest?

Mark Roberts debates with Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth on Hardfire.

Scootle Royale and John-Michael Talboo address Mark Roberts’ assertion that the red/gray chips are primer paint.

Mark Roberts claims that “no one said the air at Ground Zero was safe to breathe."

He oughta know better: Mark Roberts and the iron spherules.

Email debates, and more about Mark Roberts.


-NASA engineer Ryan Mackey-

Jim Hoffman critiques Ryan Mackey’s essay “On Debunking 9/11 Debunking.”

Mackey insists that the initial tilt of the upper section of the North Tower explains the lack of deceleration in the North Tower.
Scootle Royale and I explain why he is incorrect.

Mechanical engineer Tony Szamboti questions Ryan Mackey about claims he made during their Hardfire debate.


-Protec employee Brent Blanchard-

Jim Hoffman replies to Blanchard’s paper “A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COLLAPSE OF WTC TOWERS 1, 2 & 7 FROM AN EXPLOSIVES AND CONVENTIONAL DEMOLITION INDUSTRY VIEWPOINT”

Blanchard constantly claims that parts of explosives such as det cord should have been found in the debris.
However, a phone conversation with Dr. Steven Jones suggests otherwise.

Former Controlled Demolition Inc. explosives loader Tom Sullivan on Blanchard’s claims about finding parts of explosives in the debris.

Andrea Dreger on Blanchard’s claims about molten metal at Ground Zero. Pg. 145


-Mike Williams of 911myths.com-

John-Michael Talboo examines Mike Williams’ claims about intercepts and the NORAD stand-down.

Forum poster Beached critiques numerous claims made by Mike Williams.*Note: I do not agree with everything on this page.

Mike Williams takes on Pakistan's ISI link to the 9/11 funding.
Here’s the other side of the argument. More on this subject here.


-Physical chemist Dr. Frank Greening-

Dr. Greening makes a lazy attempt at refuting the Active Thermitic Material paper.
Dr. Steven Jones responds.

Dr. Greening hypothesizes that there could have been natural thermite reactions within the WTC buildings.
Mechanical engineer Gordon Ross addresses these claims.

Dr. Frank Legge addresses Dr. Greening’s criticisms of David Chandler’s analysis of WTC 1’s collapse.

David Chandler responds to Dr. Greening’s letter regarding Newton’s 3rd Law and falling buildings.

Andrea Dreger on Dr. Greening’s article “Aluminum and the World Trade Center Disaster.” Pg. 113

Dr. Greening’s theories about what caused the sulfidation of WTC steel are put to the test by civil engineer Jonathan Cole.


-Explosives expert Ron Craig-

Ron Craig debates with Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Former explosives loader Tom Sullivan on Ron Craig’s claims about explosives causing damage to other buildings.


-Mathematician Dave Thomas-

Analysis of Dave Thomas’ debate with Richard Gage, including comments by mechanical engineer Tony Szamboti.

Further analysis of the claims made by Dave Thomas during his debate with Richard Gage.

Tony Szamboti comments on Dave Thomas’ physics model of the WTC collapse.


-Pat Curely and James B. of Screw Loose Change-

Pat Curley debates with 9/11 truth activist Jon Gold.

Pat Curley attempts to debunk the "rebunkers."
John-Michael Talboo responds.

After 16 months of debunking Screw Loose Change, James B. comments on the Debunking the Debunkers blog to discuss pretty girls.

Pat Curley: the king of scientific peer-review.

Pat Curley attempts to cast doubt on the results of the Active Thermitic Material paper.
John-Michael Talboo demonstrates why he is wrong.

Pat Curley claims that Steven Jones makes a strawman argument, but only exposes his own failed logic and poor research.

James B. claims that “trutherism is a mythology, not a science.”
I show why he is completely wrong.

Pat Curley attempts to discredit Sibel Edmonds.
John-Michael Talboo exposes his errors.

Pat Curley misrepresents the firefighter testimony and then accuses 9/11 truthers of doing the same thing.

Pat Curley attempts to use the firefighter testimony to prove WTC7 was engulfed in flames.
John-Michael Talboo shows why he is wrong.

James B. and Pat Curley attempt to discredit the film Zeitgeist and 9/11 truth through association to a killer.
Scootle Royal and I show why these claims are baseless.


-Dr. Zdenek Bazant-

Structural engineer Anders Björkman’s discussion of Bazant’s paper "What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York."

Chemical engineer James Gourley’s discussion of Bazant’s paper “Mechanics of Progressive Collapse: Learning from World Trade Center and Building Demolitions.”


-Physicist Manuel Garcia-

Jim Hoffman critiques Manuel Garcia’s articles on 9/11.
Part 1. Part 2. Part 3.

Dr. David Griscom addresses Dr. Manuel’s CounterPunch articles on the WTC collapses.

Francisco González comments on Garcia's Sept. 12, 2007 article in CounterPunch.

Dr. Crockett Grabbe on Dr. Garcia’s WTC arguments.

Kevin Ryan shows that Manuel Garcia sees physics that don’t exist.


-Dr. Keith Seffen-

Dr. Crockett Grabbe’s discussion of Dr. Seffen’s paper "Progressive Collapse of the World Trade Center: A Simple Analysis."


-Joseph Welch-

Stewart Bradley responds to Joseph Welch's "15 questions 9/11 ‘truthers’ now need to answer."


Youtube debunkers
---------------------------


-Ryan Owens/RKOwens4-

Ryan Owens’ debunking videos refuted by my “9/11 Un-debunked” series.
Version 1. Version 2.

My open letter to Ryan Owens.

My comments on Mr. Owens’ response to my open letter.

John-Michael Talboo shows Ryan Owens that controlled demolition is possible.

Ryan Owens debates with Debunking the Debunkers blog contributor Stewart Bradley.

Ryan Owens accuses me of taking money for my 9/11 videos.
I inform him that he is incorrect.

Jason Bermas addresses Ryan Owens’ claims about the temperatures in the Ground Zero debris.

Mr. Owens makes numerous assertions about WTC7’s collapse.
I show his claims to be wrong.

The US State Department uses one of Ryan Owens’ videos as “debunking” of 9/11 controlled demolition theories.


-AlienEntity-

John-Michael Talboo refutes AlienEntity’s video “Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: Lies and Distortions,” then debates with him on the subject.

AlienEntity claims his measurements corroborate NIST’s results.
I show why he’s wrong.


-Dan Stevens/dsglop-

Dan Stevens appears in Nathan Moulten’s film “Activist.”

Dan Stevens attempts to answer Charlie Sheen’s 20 Questions to Obama.
I show why his answers are nonsense.


-K.T. Penn/loosechangeexposed-

My refutation of many of K.T. Penn’s claims.

The many absurd beliefs of K.T. Penn.


-deRoyLight-

Stewart Bradley addresses deRoy's video "Defusing Nanothermite: Integrity."


-dprjones-

Stewart Bradley addresses dprjones' video "Advice and a challenge for 9/11 'truthers'"


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 20th, 2011.]

Toxin from GM Crops Found in Human Blood: Study

Fresh doubts have arisen about the safety of genetically modified crops, with a new study reporting presence of Bt toxin, used widely in GM crops, in human blood for the first time.

Genetically modified crops include genes extracted from bacteria to make them resistant to pest attacks.

These genes make crops toxic to pests but are claimed to pose no danger to the environment and human health. Genetically modified brinjal, whose commercial release was stopped a year ago, has a toxin derived from a soil bacterium called Bacillus thuringiensis ( Bt).

Till now, scientists and multinational corporations promoting GM crops have maintained that Bt toxin poses no danger to human health as the protein breaks down in the human gut. But the presence of this toxin in human blood shows that this does not happen.

Scientists from the University of Sherbrooke, Canada, have detected the insecticidal protein, Cry1Ab, circulating in the blood of pregnant as well as non-pregnant women.

They have also detected the toxin in fetal blood, implying it could pass on to the next generation. The research paper has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in the journal Reproductive Toxicology. The study covered 30 pregnant women and 39 women who had come for tubectomy at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS) in Quebec.

None of them had worked or lived with a spouse working in contact with pesticides.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/site/story/toxin-from-gm-crops-found-in-human-blood/1/137728.html


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 20th, 2011.]

Thursday, 19 May 2011

Busby: Fukushima Reactors a Raging Radioactive Inferno

There are signs that two further reactors at Japan's troubled Fukushima plant may have gone into meltdown. Similar problems were earlier confirmed at the number one reactor. Its operators are suspected of failing to properly cool them after the earthquake. RT gets some insight on this from Professor Christopher Busby, who's from the European Committee on Radiation Risks.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 19th, 2011.]

Keiser Report (E147): Snow Globe of Denial

This time Max Keiser and co-host, Stacy Herbert, report on coffee speculators and crude plunges. In the second half of the show, Max talks to Reggie Middleton of BoomBustBlog.com about banking industry as the new tobacco industry and about the price of the bailout as the economic future of the United States.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 19th, 2011.]

Eli Pariser: Beware Online "Filter Bubbles"





And remember Google is a big corporation and will act like one, in terms of using censorship, if past history is any guide, to protect the interests of the highly paid executives running the show.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 19th, 2011.]

Scientists on the Bogus Tests "Proving" Airport Scanners Safe

The professors, from the University of California, San Francisco, and one at Arizona State University, point out several flaws in the tests.

They note that the Johns Hopkins lab, where the tests were conducted, didn't test an actual airport machine. Instead, the tests were done on a model built by the manufacturer, Rapiscan, and configured to resemble a system previously tested by the TSA.

The Johns Hopkins researchers' names have been kept secret, and the report on the tests is so "heavily redacted" that "there is no way to repeat any of these measurements," the scientists wrote.
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2011/05/scientists-on-bogus-tests-proving.html


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 19th, 2011.]

Wednesday, 18 May 2011

Strauss-Kahn Sex Scandal Obscures Real IMF Story - RT

Mainstream American media turned its attention towards the International Monetary Fund this week, but coverage didn't concern the looming economic crisis. Instead, it is the sex scandal of IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn that has turned heads today. Is this news of an alleged rape a legitimate story or merely smoke and mirrors to obscure the real story? Former Reagan administration official Paul Craig Roberts shares his take on it.




[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 18th, 2011.]

RECAP: 911 BREAKTHROUGH INFORMATION: Activist Kevin Ryan on the Prime Suspects in the WTC Mass Murders, Nanothermites, and How The Towers Were Rigged.

Alex Jones talks with Kevin Ryan about the latest research on the collapse of the WTC buildings showing that highly specialised nanothermites were used. Because very few people had access to this sort technology the list of suspects in the crime is short.

There is information here about the three way connection between the people with knowledge of these high tech incendiary explosives, those involved in the WTC fireproofing upgrades and those involved in the NIST investigations ... all the same people ... or at least many of the same. The interview reveals some prime suspects to the crime and how they may have carried out the demolition.

I would wager that a couple of highly protected Grand Juries could cause a lot of trouble for the perpetrators with the information aired here.


Part 1 (10:52)


Part 2 (10:56)


Part 3 (10:59)


Part 4 (8:22)

A must see/hear interview !!

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 18th, 2011.]

Interview with John Perkins - On the Edge with Max Keiser

In this edition of On the Edge, Max Keiser interviews John Perking who is the author of 'Confessions of an Economic Hit Man'.





[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 18th, 2011.]

Webster Tarpley & Elite's Plan for Global Extermination Trailer

This is the trailer for the upcoming prisonplanet.tv exclusive interview with Dr. Webster Tarpley. In this interview, Dr. Tarpley reviews the writings of John P. Holdren, the current Whitehouse science advisor. This interview conclusively exposes scientific elite's true agenda, world-wide genocide and the formation of a global government to rule.



If you want to reduce the world's population I believe that educating people and providing them a good level of living will do the trick. Look at what's happened in Europe with many people choosing not to have large families or families at all.

The moves by these elites, in my mind, is to deny people their intelligence and education so they can maintain their power base. Poisoning the food and water supply is a nasty tactic. However, if they end up killing too many then they won't have enough victims to live off or plunder (ie via the banks issuing debt etc).

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 18th, 2011.]

Monday, 16 May 2011

Important Fukushima Updates - Michael Rivero



Great info and awesome background material on the role of corporations in this mess.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 16th, 2011.]

US Conspiracies, Cover-ups and Propaganda (and Bin Laden's Death)

Why should we trust the US government and corporate press about the death of Bin Laden ? There are holes in the story, there are fake Bin Laden tapes and the body was thrown in the ocean. Consider this short history of US cover-ups, secret operations and propaganda actions:

Operation Ajax -- the CIA sponsored overthrow of Iranian government in the 1950s,

The Gulf of Tonkin Incident -- US leaders (President Lyndon Johnson) lie in 1964 about a North Vietnamese attack on US warships,

MK ULTRA -- CIA mind control experiments that lead to the death of at least one subject,

Operation Northwoods -- the US military plan, approved by the Joint Chiefs, to launch terror attacks in the US, to blame on Cuba, and reportedly vetoed by JFK,

The Murder of President Kennedy -- official documents now reveal that Oswald was a CIA asset, the official magic bullet theory is impossible (do the experiment), there is an audio tape indicating more than 3 gunshots in Dallas meaning there must have been a second shooter,

COINTELPRO -- the FBI infiltration and use of agents provocateur against US government protest groups,

The Murder of Senator Robert F Kennedy -- forensic scientists have recently revealed that the official story is a lie, that the convicted shooter, Sirhan Sirhan, could not have fired the fatal shots, that one of RFK's guards, who was connected to the CIA, is the only possible killer,

Operation Mockingbird -- the CIA's role in bribing or manipulating journalists to serve the interests of the state or rather Pentagon.

Operation Gladio -- the CIA along, with other European countries, involvement in sponsoring violent socialist and/or communist terror attacks in Europe, that involved the killing of innocent civilians, designed to turn public opinion away from these groups during the Cold War,

"Iran-Contra" Operation -- members of the White House and US military secretly sell arms to their enemy Iran as part of hostage negotiations and use the money to covertly sponsor the Contra rebels in Nicaragua,

CIA Drug Operations -- implicated in the drug trade (heroin) coming out of SE Asia during the 60s and 70s, plus implicated in Central and South American cocaine trade during the 80s, and the Middle East opium trade during the 80s (during the Soviet Occupation of Afghanistan), http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1998_cr/980507-l.htm

The babies-thrown-from-Incubators lie -- propaganda sponsored by the Kuwaiti and US Governments to influence public opinion in the aftermath of Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait,

CIA involvement in sponsoring Muslim fighters in and into Europe during conflicts arising in the 90s -- via indirect support and directly via the US Embassy in Jeddah (Saudia Arabia) and via proxies operating out of Pakistan connected to Afghanistan,

The TWA Flight 800 Shoot Down -- after the accidental shootdown of TWA Flight 800 out of New York US authorities impose a cover-up using FBI agents who were caught removing evidence, a fake simulated video (courtesy of the CIA) was later shown of the aircraft performing a physically impossible "zoom climb" after losing its forward fuselage.

Oklahoma City Bombing -- bomb damage assessments of the building show explosives must have been used inside the structure, local TV reports the discovery of other devices inside the damaged building, other suspects in the case apart from Nichols and McVeigh are ignored, all surveillance camera video of the truck bomb arriving on scene is withheld by the authorities and later released missing the data,

Covert US involvement plus cover-up of the 911 Attacks against the World Trade Centre Towers -- the destruction of the three skyscrapers in New York City is impossible without explosives (aircraft and/or fires will not be sufficient), forensic evidence has shown the presence of military grade explosives all throughout the dust (see Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth website for the data and criticism of the official "investigations"),

The White House and Pentagon lies about Iraq's WMDs in 2002 -- the intelligence was not mistaken but was spun to make a case for war. Knowingly false or doubtful reports were presented as hard fact such as the Niger Uranium, the Aluminium "centrifuge" tubes, the mobile "chemical weapons" labs, the UK's "Dodgy Dossier" 45 minute threat projection claim, the nuclear program claims by informant "curveball", the report that Iraq intelligence agents met with Al Qaeda in Europe etc.

London's 7/7 Bombing -- it is physically impossible for the official story to be true because camera footage showing the bombers at certain points reveal the attackers could not have made the connecting trains, physical evidence and reports suggest the train bombs were planted underneath the carriages,
[this one's not directly connect to the US, but what the heck !]

The Gulf of Mexico Oil Disaster -- President Obama and staff lie to the American people that the water is safe to swim in (with a misleading photo) and insist the sealife is also safe to eat (subsequent testing has proven otherwise),

One must recognise that, behind the images projected in the mainstream media, and in movies, there are is a highly corrupt element influencing, or rather controlling, US affairs. The notion of a sinister military-industrial complex, one that puts the interests of the corporations and the Washington establishment ahead of the general well-being of the people, is real.

- Spook

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 16th, 2011.]

Iran Can Prove Bin Laden was Dead Long Before US Raid – Iranian Minister

Iranian Intelligence Minister Heydar Moslehi claims that Osama Bin Laden died from an illness before the US raid on his compound in Abbottabad. Iran has documents to prove it, he said.

­"We have credible information that Bin Laden died some time ago of a disease," Moslehi said on the sidelines of a cabinet meeting on Sunday, as quoted by ISNA news agency.

"If the US military and intelligence apparatus have really arrested or killed Bin Laden, why don't they show him [his body]? Why have they thrown his corpse into the sea?" Moslehi asked rhetorically, FARS news agency reports.

Moslehi labeled the US raid in Abbottabad as a “PR campaign”, created to divert the attention of its citizens from domestic problems, such as the “fragile” state of the US economy.

http://rt.com/news/osama-dead-raid/


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 16th, 2011.]

Quick and Simple Action: Support Rashard Mendenhall and Vote for Free Speech

A poll has been conducted and is still available for voting at USA Today.

The vote is concerning Rashard Mendenhall's loss of his corporate sponsor Champion apparel after his remarks about Bin Laden and 9/11.

The vote results right now will make you cringe, and we need to impact the results:

•68% think Rashard's sponsor dropping him was the right thing to do.
•18% Think Champion should not have dropped him, and allowed him to speak his mind freely.
•14% Dont care.

Will you help me bump up that 18%? CLICK HERE to vote.

After the killing of Bin Laden, NFL running back Rashard Mendenhall posted a Tweet to his fans saying this:

What kind of person celebrates death? It's amazing how people can HATE a man they have never even heard speak. We've only heard one side...

He went on further to say this about the demolition os the WTC buildings:

“We’ll never know what really happened. I just have a hard time believing a plane could take a skyscraper down demolition style.
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/05/quick-and-simple-action-support-rashard.html

Vote now !

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 16th, 2011.]

Sunday, 15 May 2011

Iraq Dossier Drawn Up to Make Case for War – Intelligence Officer

A top military intelligence official has said the discredited dossier on Iraq's weapons programme was drawn up "to make the case for war", flatly contradicting persistent claims to the contrary by the Blair government, and in particular by Alastair Campbell, the former prime minister's chief spin doctor.

In hitherto secret evidence to the Chilcot inquiry, Major General Michael Laurie said: "We knew at the time that the purpose of the dossier was precisely to make a case for war, rather than setting out the available intelligence, and that to make the best out of sparse and inconclusive intelligence the wording was developed with care."

His evidence is devastating, as it is the first time such a senior intelligence officer has directly contradicted the then government's claims about the dossier – and, perhaps more significantly, what Tony Blair and Campbell said when it was released seven months before the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Laurie, who was director general in the Defence Intelligence Staff, responsible for commanding and delivering raw and analysed intelligence, said: "I am writing to comment on the position taken by Alastair Campbell during his evidence to you … when he stated that the purpose of the dossier was not to make a case for war; I and those involved in its production saw it exactly as that, and that was the direction we were given."
http://weeklyintercept.blogspot.com/2011/05/iraq-dossier-drawn-up-to-make-case-for.html


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 15th, 2011.]

AE911Truth Statement on Alleged Recent Death of Osama bin Laden

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org), a tax-exempt nonprofit educational charity, has been asked to comment on the alleged recent death of Osama bin Laden. Reports of bin Laden's death, even if true, explain NONE of the overwhelming evidence for the explosive controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11. For several years now we have been citing this evidence in support of a genuine, subpoena-powered, independent investigation. We have been joined in that call by almost 1500 licensed and/or degreed architects and engineers and almost 12,000 others, including chemists, physicists, firefighters, attorneys, and other professionals. When the flag-waving pep rallies have all died down, this evidence will still be here, demanding a serious accounting from our elected officials and the agencies that serve them. Osama bin Laden’s death does not begin to address these disturbing facts:

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

1 Rapid onset of collapse
2
Sounds of explosions at ground floor – a second before the building's destruction
3 Symmetrical "structural failure" – through the path of greatest resistance –
at free-fall acceleration
4 Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint
5 Massive volume of expanding
pyroclastic-like dust clouds
6 Expert corroboration from the top European controlled demolition professional
7
Foreknowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY

In the the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendiary devices was discovered:

1 FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
2 Several tons of
molten metal reported by numerous highly qualified witnesses
3 Chemical signature of the
incendiary thermite found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples

WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:

1 Slow onset with large visible deformations
2 Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3 Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel ...
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/511-ae911truth-statement-on-alleged-recent-death-of-osama-bin-laden.html


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 15th, 2011.]