Thursday, 18 August 2011

The 9/11 Building "Collapses" In Perspective

[According to the 911 truth Debunkers ...] Making comparisons between the three World Trade Center towers and other high rise buildings that burned much hotter for much longer and didn't collapse is ludicrous because of their different constructions. But comparing the towers to a low-rise 13 story building in Holland or a toy factory is perfectly acceptable!



Even ignoring all the forensic evidence, that proves explosive thermite was used on the Twin Towers and Building 7, it's obvious from the historical record that there are SERIOUS problems with the collapses of the 3 World Trade Centre Buildings on 911. The official explanation, that fires caused the collapses, doesn't make any sense. Moreover, the "reasoning" put out by the debunkers, to account for the building implosions, is obviously nonsensical.

The very fact that WTC7 collapsed at all- a building that was designed to be resistant to hurricanes, earthquakes and fires- was the key evidence that rang alarm bells for myself and led to a second look at the official story.

(thanks to Debunking the Debunkers for the You Tube clip and intro !)

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, August 18th, 2011.]

No comments: