Thursday, 17 September 2009

Has Osama Bin Laden been Dead for Seven Years - and are the U.S. and Britain Covering it up to Continue War on Terror?

This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive?

Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West.

The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan.

His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom.

The author insists that the many Bin Laden tapes made since that date have been concocted by the West to make the world believe Bin Laden is alive. The purpose? To stoke up waning support for the war on terror in Iraq and Afghanistan.

To understand Griffin's thesis, we must remember the West's reaction to 9/11, that fateful sunny September day in 2001. Within a month, on Sunday, October 7, the U.S. and Britain launched massive retaliatory air strikes in the Tora Bora region where they said 'prime suspect' Bin Laden was living 'as a guest of Afghanistan'.

This military offensive ignored the fact that Bin Laden had already insisted four times in official Al Qaeda statements made to the Arab press that he played no role in 9/11.

Indeed, on the fourth occasion, on September 28 and a fortnight after the atrocity, he declared emphatically: 'I have already said I am not involved. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge... nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act.'

This great article also cites the opinions of two other professors, having relevant expertise in terms of evaluating Bin Laden, who point to evidence that indicate the tapes post Dec 13th, 2001, are fakes.

What gets really gets to me is the fact that the fat Bin Laden in his 2001 "confession" video is right-handed whereas the real Bin Laden is left handed.

Nothing about the official 911 story has been substantiated. In fact the forensic evidence from the World Trade Centre proves the attacks involved inside help- the sort of help that Bin Laden could not have provided:

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 17th, 2009.]

No comments: