Friday, 10 July 2009

Scientists Support NYC CAN Initiative

Dear 9/11 Truth Movement Supporters,

As authors of the recent mainstream scientific articles relating to events at the World Trade Center, we urge you to support a tremendous opportunity for getting the truth out about 9/11.

On Wednesday, June 24, 2009, the New York City Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN) filed a petition containing 52,000 signatures calling for a referendum on the creation of a New York City independent commission to begin an investigation with subpoena power. Unlike the first 9/11 Commission, this one will consider all of the evidence, including evidence for the use of explosives in bringing down the buildings.

This is what many of us have been working toward for years. With a new commission, our scientific evidence can be used to achieve real results.

NYC CAN now needs only 20,000 more signatures to override City Council if the referendum is vetoed. If NYC CAN gets the signatures the referendum will go on the ballot, and surely New York City will vote in favor of a new investigation. Please donate now so that this new investigation can happen:

If everyone reading this donates at least $10, or the full amount they are able, we will raise enough to not only collect the signatures, but also to launch a summer PR blitz that will ensure all of New York City will be watching if Mayor Bloomberg and City Council try to kill the effort.

There are some true heroes on the NYC CAN Executive Council, and together with them, we have never been this close to giving 9/11 Truth a real chance. This is your opportunity to alter the course of history.

Please donate now:


James Gourley, Niels Harrit, Steven Jones, Brad Larsen, Frank Legge, Gregg Roberts, Kevin Ryan

Sign the petition and donate what you can ! Open the can of worms and witness what unfolds.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, July 10th, 2009.]


steven andresen said...


I found this,

The blogger argues that there is something fishy about Prof. Griffith because he has said that the only way to bring justice about 9-11 is for there to be 'one world government.'

Can you say something about this concern?

SpookyPunkos said...


I think that the argument at the link goes too far: that 911 truth is now another vehicle for the elite to take control of the system.

My view on Griffin and others is that they try to stick to a conservative view of things. As trained academics that is wise. Also I can understand the aversion to obviously pointing the finger at Israeli involvement in the crime since this immediately draws "anti-semitic" criticism from many quarters.

I think the academic calls are for global co-operation in exposing the crime rather than a "one world government". I think the author is misrepresenting the case being made here.

Also, I think the idea in the article, that any investigation will be controlled and rigged and therefore not go far enough up the ladder, with Bush being the only culprit, is dead wrong.

Once there is an open investigation everyone will be open to the idea of watching various conspiracy videos and will quickly work out for themselves that there are more things to be looked at. It will be commonly accepted that there is more to the case than just those directly involved in the mass murders.

Plus the investigation, recognising the critical role that secrecy has played in concealing the crime, and stopping previous attempts at airing the evidence, will ensure a transparent and open case. The investigation could not be rigged. It'll be operating under a giant spotlight 24/7.

I think we will see a very open investigation which will raise questions that touch on the behind the scenes groups, ie The Carslyle Group meeting held on 911, the role of non-government neocons like Richard Pearl and others, the links to corporations, the Washington elite + corrupt systems that prevented proper investigations in the first place etc.

There's too many obvious links to ignore. It'll be the biggest can of worms event ever. Lots of worms everywhere with everyone watching ...