Tuesday, 23 September 2008

911 Debate: Richard Gage verses Michael Shermer on Oakland Radio

http://a1135.g.akamai.net/f/1135/18227/1h/cchannel.download.akamai.com/18227/podcast/SANFRANCISCO-CA/KKGN-AM/The%20Angie%20Coiro%20Show%20Sep%2018th.mp3
(50:28)

In this debate architect Richard Gage details the FORENSIC EVIDENCE showing that the Twin Towers and Building 7 of the World Trade Centre were brought down with pre-planted explosives. Throughout the broadcast the "skeptic" Michael Shermer tries to whitewash this issue by denying the evidence - he tries to change the topic or ridicule the issues. It's a disgraceful effort.

In listening to Shermer's replies I find it hard to believe that an academic with his training could take the positions he does in the face of the mountains of physical evidence cited by Gage. Shermer, in the most amateur way, appears completely oblivious to the hard evidence indicating that explosive devices MUST have been used to bring down the buildings on 911.

Curiously, Shermer who appears as an "expert" rebuttal witness seems to have little knowledge about what he is talking about. He is not familiar with details of the Molten Metal, the witnesses to explosions, the evidence for Thermate, the circumstances of the Flight 93 crash and he does not correct a caller as to the type of aircraft that (perhaps) hit the Pentagon- a 757.

To determine who is correct in this debate please refer to the physical evidence, logic and the known laws of physics- laws that were not suspended during the morning of September 11, 2001.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 23nd, 2008.]

No comments: