Thursday, 30 August 2007
The 6th Anniversary of 911: An Open Letter to the Mainstream Media on The Validity of the Inside Job Hypothesis.
To the doubters I can only ask whether all these professionals are wacko ? It is worth a look to see what they actually have to say.
One thing you must be mindful about is that the Official 911 Report is a PROVEN pack of lies & all subsequent "scientific" studies backing up this narrative have also turned out to be rubbish. The oft cited Popular Mechanics rebuttal to the Inside Job hypothesis is a sham. Likewise the Purdue University endorsement of the official NISTs investigation into the WTC attacks is an absolute joke. The lesson here is that just because a report is written by scientists does not make it scientific. Explanations need to be logical and based on verifiable fact.
Without a doubt, part of the 911 attacks MUST have involved inside help. You should consider these 4 physical proofs indicating that Explosive Demolition WAS used to bring down the buildings at the World Trade Centre site- this is something Bin Laden's men could not have done. They are:
1. the Tons of Molten Steel found in the rubble,
2. the detection of Thermate EXPLOSIVE products in the Steel and Dust taken from Ground Zero,
3. the freefall, low resistance collapse time of all the WTC buildings,
4. the very fact that a third, relatively undamaged skyscraper (WTC 7), collapsed at all.
How the operation was achieved is beyond me, but that is a question for later. As has been pointed out- in typical fire investigations- once clear evidence of arson, such as petrol residue, is discovered then a criminal investigation is required regardless as to the specific details of how the petrol was employed. Common sense would tell you that investigations into 911 require a similar approach.
My primary concern at the moment is that despite the damning, irrefutable evidence for the 911 Inside Job, the mainstream media is loath to touch the subject. With respect, it appears that ignorance, ego and fear are stopping most journalists from even looking at the evidence.
The problem remains that if 911 was a staged attack one would assume there could very well be another. Recent comments from the US Vice President and the Homeland Security Chief, indicate they are "expecting" further attacks on the US mainland in the near future. Let us hope they are not thinking about employing chemical or nuclear devices this time around.
On the eve of the 6th Anniversary of 911, I hope your paper/program can run this story about the serious physical evidence which shows the September 11 attacks must have been an inside job. A serious discussion about the scientific evidence, the Molten Steel, the Thermate explosive products, needs to occur. Something MUST to be done to stop any further attacks and to see the protagonists of the original crime brought to Justice.
"Texas Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul says that attempts to rescue an ailing stock market last week, during which the Fed pumped in billions in liquidity, were merely a stop gap measure - and that an economic collapse is all but inevitable."
UPDATE: Architects and Engineers For 911 Truth: More than 150* Building Experts say 911 was an Inside Job.
One Hundred and Fifty building experts now accept that the attacks on the World Trade Centre were an inside job. The science behind the attacks is irrefutable. The numbers of experts supporting the "Inside Job" hypothesis increases daily.
Exposing this truth is necessary to stop the next attacks that will be used as an excuse to clamp down on US freedoms and possibly launch a War verses Iran. We live in dangerous times and we need experts like these to help fight against such devious crimes and the criminals who are running them. The information they provide can be used by honourable Law Enforcement, Judicial and Military persons in actions against the real suspects. Let Justice be Done.
Wednesday, 29 August 2007
Can the "Plunge Protection Team" pump enough money into the US sharemarket to keep up confidence and stop a huge crash ?
The underlying problems of unpayable debts, held by almost all players, are immense. The idea was okay so long as the markets kept going up and you had income coming in and you didn't have to pay back the money. It was easy- borrow HUGE amounts of cheap money to invest and make deals and then pay later .... uh oh ....
Now the players are trying to keep a lid on the extent of the problem so as to arrest any full scale flight from the markets.
At present the US economy is a confidence scam.
Their inflation rate is NOT at 2.5% and their unemployment levels are NOT at 4.8%.
The real figures are in the double digits.
Things will have to get worse before they get better. The folks covering up, and holding back the current crisis have to admit the truth before they can start to rebuild the US economy on more realistic lines.
Tuesday, 28 August 2007
There's a 4.5 Billion Dollar Stockmarket "bet" that markets will fall 30-50%.
Right before 911 similar financial bets were place against United Airlines and American Airlines stocks. This is a serious warning to everyone about a new attack since the person who placed the bets will loose substantially if nothing happens.
Mystery trader bets markets will drop by 30%.
Ex-US Congresswoman McKinney and others report warnings of possible new attacks on the US in the near future.
US National Academy of Sciences Member Calls for New 911 Investigation. Says Official Explanation is a "Fraud"
I see she has read Professor David Ray Griffin's books that summarise the problems with the official story. (see the sidebar on this page for links to Griffin's books & essays)
There's big time criminals out there who have launched the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and they have so far gotten away with the crime. Hopefully their time is drawing to a close.
"As a matter of law, there is a sufficient quantum of evidence for the appointment of an independent prosecutor under Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute treason against President GW Bush; Vice President Richard B. Cheney; and the Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld for the armed attack upon the United States on September 11, 2001, in the guise of a False Flag Operation."
Announcement to be made on Sept. 8-9, 2007, New York City, USA.
Monday, 27 August 2007
CNN: Republican Interviewee Surprises Hosts when She names Ron Paul (!!) as Her Preferred Presidential Candidate
Mainstream media schmucks.
Thursday, 23 August 2007
The Evidence proving that the 911 attacks were an Inside Job is pretty conclusive. The real problem we face is 1. censorship by the mainstream media and 2. the efforts of pro-government propagandists - the hit pieces (The most recent aired on the History Channel. see story below for details). The objective of this post is to propose a strategy to overcome these "obstacles"
The best thing about this situtation is that our opponents have to get away with making a whole host of unsupported LIES in order to win. As soon as their Lies are exposed, and the true details surrounding the WTC attacks are brought to the public's attention, they have lost.
From past experience, regarding similar issues, I must say that the 911 evidence is a gift since it is so clear cut - government supporters cannot really obfuscate the core material. No matter how you twist the details, no one can convincingly argue that there was no Molten Steel at 911 Ground Zero, or that there was no Thermate traces, or that WTC 7 did not collapse as per Controlled Demolition, or that people in the lower levels of the Towers were not subject to significant explosions. We have a massive advantage. I would also point out that the strategy taken by the debunkers when confronted with these proofs is to ignore them- this is dangerous information.
My suggestion therefore is to attack the censorship wall with this very evidence- create supercool, attention grabbing music videos ready for distribution on the net. I hope you all remember the "Pentagon Strike" video. When it came out this caused a great stir on the internet. That approach is exactly what is needed, except there will be better content this time around.
I propose two clips:
Clip 1. Based on Steven Jones' Papers.
Opening: "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"
Then: (play music soft music) The official reports say that the building fires caused the WTC collapses. The airplane damage was not critical (brief evidence)
Then: (music change to heavier) But, no skyscrapers have EVER collapsed due to fire. pics/vids.
Then: The World trade Centre Fires were weak. Really hot fires look like this... Official NIST simulations could not get the steel to weaken enough for a collapse...
Then: If the Fires were weak, what caused the Steel Beams, weighing many tons, to become Molten ? ground zero pics o molten steel.
(Then: The site was superhot. NASA IR photos showing 700 C hot spots.)
Then: Steel will only Melt at 1300 C > either inside a blast furnace (pic/oxygen is pumped in here) or through the use of EXPLOSIVES.
Then: (fade music) "Video of witnesses to explosives in lower levels of WTC 911"
Then: Back to pic of Molten steel (close up). This IS Molten Steel.Then: (music back on)The buildings MUST have been rigged.
Then: WTC 7 comparative analysis video to controlled demolition + explanation that the all load bearing members must have failed simultaneously. Building resistance = Air. Physics.
Then: Pic of controlled demolition diagonal beam comparison to diagonal beams at ground zero.
Then: The smoking gun. Thermate Products detected in WTC dust and Steel. No other explanation other than explosive demolition. 911 was an Inside Job.
Close: "When you have eliminated the Impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
ENDING: The Scientific Evidence is conclusive. Visit 911 Scholars, architects for more info etc. links.(....something like that)
Clip 2. Based on David Ray Griffin's Book Debunking 911 Debunking and his paper the 571 page lie.
The clip should feature the word LIARS frequently (or similar). and focus on NISTs and Popular Mechanics. It's aim is to detail the fact that the official story is not at all believable. Featuring Norman Minneta, Sibel Edmonds, General Meyers, General Arnold, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Popular Mechanics talking heads, etc etc. ENDING. links.
I lack the skills to create such a video so I ask that readers of this site with the necessary ability and/or connections, to get it made or to talk to others who can. This is a serious Propaganda War. The aim is to see Justice done and to stop the next false flag attacks.
Wednesday, 22 August 2007
Tuesday, 21 August 2007
Ultra-light "frozen smoke" material can be used as insulation, bomb proofing, a supersponge and more. Fantastic stuff.
(thanks to Jonesy for the link !!)
Saturday, 18 August 2007
Panic on Wall Street.
You've heard about the home-loan bust, but do you know your derivatives from your tranches? Read Salon's easy guide to understanding the current market freakout. By Andrew Leonard. (posted from Salon.com )
Aug. 17, 2007 From New York to Hong Kong and everywhere in between, alarm bells are ringing. Central bankers are on 24/7 alert, ready to perform life support on catatonic markets. Stock traders are panicking -- the Dow's wild ride on Wednesday, down 350 points and then almost all the way back, is just the latest declaration of confusion and fear.
If you had been paying only casual attention to the financial markets as summer rolled along, you could be excused for glancing at the headlines and wondering, what the hell is going on? By many measures the global economy is growing faster than it has for decades. But in our globalized world, anxiety is everywhere. Soon after the markets close in New York, Asia's traders start running for cover. By the time they're exhausted, Europe is picking up the relay. And then back to the United States it comes.
People who devote their entire lives to studying the intricacies of high finance are confused right now. But the basic story line isn't that complicated once you break it down into simple building blocks. And that's what Salon is going to do. Here are some simple questions and, we hope, some simple answers.
How did this happen? How did we get here? What does it all mean?
There is a standard explanation included as a paragraph in almost every story attempting to explain the current turmoil. It goes like this: Anxious to goose the U.S. economy out of its dot-com-bust doldrums, Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve Bank lowered interest rates to rock bottom in 2001. The resulting flood of cheap money encouraged an orgy of borrowing at every level of the U.S. and world economies. Whether you wanted to buy a house or a multibillion-dollar conglomerate, lenders were your best friends, falling over themselves to offer you whatever amount of capital you desired -- and charging low, low rates of interest. Cheap money led to a growing complacency about risk. If you ran into trouble, you could just refinance your house, or borrow a few billion more dollars today to pay off the billions you might owe tomorrow.
Greenspan's policies are being blamed for inciting the greatest housing bubble in U.S. history. The collapse of that bubble set off a wave of defaults by homeowners no longer able to make the payments on their mortgages. Mortgage lenders were the next link of the chain to break, followed by the investors who were trading in bonds and securities whose value was tied to these loans. Suddenly, risk was back!
So that's that? It's Greenspan's fault?
Partially, but interest rate tinkering is not the whole story. It may not even be the most important part of the story. There's another reason so many homeowners are in trouble and stock markets are imploding: Wall Street rigged the system so something like this was inevitable.
One could make a case that the biggest economic story of the last 10 years -- bigger than the dot-com or housing booms, bigger than their busts, perhaps even bigger than the extraordinary growth of the Chinese and Indian economies -- has been the astonishing growth of what is obscurely referred to as "structured finance," a crazy quilt of arcane derivatives and other "financial instruments" that have become the lifeblood of markets everywhere.
Whoa. Stop right there. What is a derivative?
Strictly speaking, a derivative is a financial doohickey whose value derives from some underlying asset. A mortgage loan is an asset. A pool of mortgage loans grouped together into a security that can be traded on markets is a derivative.
We often hear about the "real economy," that place where real people buy and sell real things, or go to work at real jobs where they make real stuff or deliver real services. Derivatives belong to what should be called -- but never is -- the unreal economy, a place where speculators make bets about what will happen in the real economy. Derivatives are vehicles for making such bets. If you think the borrowers whose loans are pooled together are going to make their payments, then buying a share in a group of such investments might be a good idea. That would be your bet.
A metaphor might be useful here. The real economy is like the Super Bowl. Real men on a real field push each other around and play with a real ball for a set period of time, and the team with the most points at the end wins. But while all this is going on, millions of outsiders who are not physically involved in the game bet on its outcome. Only they don't bet just on the outcome. They also bet on the spread -- how badly one team might beat the other. Or they can get more creative and bet on what the combined score of the teams might be, or which team's quarterback will be the first to be injured. There's absolutely no limit to the things that you can bet on, as long as you can find someone to take your bet.
The betting economy is the unreal economy. All those sports bets, no matter how kooky, are financial exercises whose value and meaning are derived from what happens on the field. Theoretically speaking, the betting economy exists in a separate dimension from the actual game, but we all know that's not true. There's so much money involved in gambling that the temptation to fix the results becomes irresistible. Players and referees, for instance, can be bribed.
We can call a bribed NBA official an example of "spillover" from the betting economy into the sports economy. The very same thing happens in the real and unreal economies. So much money is riding on all the derivative bets connected to the housing sector that Wall Street speculators essentially rigged the housing sector to make their bets pay off.
To understand exactly what happened, we must take a closer look at a particular kind of derivative: the infamous "collateralized debt obligation," or CDO.
Say what? Collateralized who which how?
Don't worry about the name. Call it an extra-special funky doohickey if you like. It's not important. What is important is its function, which is to make things that should be considered risky take on the appearance of less riskiness.
After a mortgage lender makes a loan to a homebuyer, that loan is packaged up with a bunch of other loans into a security -- a financial instrument that can be traded. Securities are rated by rating agencies according to the chances that the underlying assets will be defaulted upon. U.S. Treasury bonds, for example, get stellar AAA+ ratings because the U.S. government is considered likely to meet its obligations.
A security based on a pool of subprime mortgage loans would normally not deserve an AAA+ rating. Subprime, by definition, means "not so good." Subprime loans are made to people who can't put together a down payment or have bad credit, or can't prove they have a job. Subprime loans are risky!
Many investors -- particularly in pension funds and municipalities -- are prohibited from investing in securities that are not high-rated. Let the hedge funds and the investment banks play around with the risky BBB stuff, the "junk." The rest of us should be more prudent.
But investment bankers are clever fellows. In cahoots with the ratings agencies, they came up with a way to magically transform a low-rated security to a high-rated security. (The culpability of the ratings agencies -- Fitch, Standard & Poor's, Moody's -- should be not underestimated. It might be helpful to think of them as the bribed referees in this game.)
Enter the collateralized debt obligation. The CDO takes a pool of risky mortgage loans and divides it into slices. (Wall Street calls these slices "tranches," but that seems to be a word that makes the brains of normal people freeze up, so we'll ignore it.) For simplicity's sake, let's say that a mortgage-backed security gets divided into two slices when it is transformed into a CDO -- a senior slice and a junior slice. Let's say that the senior slice gets rated AAA+ and the junior slice gets rated BBB-. But if anything goes wrong -- if the homeowners whose loans are part of this security start missing their payments -- the investors in the junior slice have to lose all of their money before the investors in the senior slice start feeling any pain. That's the beauty of the scheme. You take a bunch of bad loans and turn some of them into high-rated gold and some into lower-rated bronze. You sell the gold to the cautious and the bronze to the bold. If a few loans go kaput, the bronze investors suffer. If all the loans go kaput, everybody gets hurt. Unless there's a total financial meltdown, everyone is happily making money.
We keep hearing in the financial news about risk being "sliced and diced." Is that what you're talking about?
Yes. After the transformation, we now have an instrument that satisfies the desires of both conservative investors, who can just buy the AAA+ rated slice, and investors who have a taste for risk, who can buy the BBB- slice. It's a brilliant work of alchemy.
And very popular. CDOs tied to subprime mortgages became hot commodities, snapped up with gusto by traders all over the world -- even the riskiest, most likely to self-immolate, lowest-rated slices of those CDOs. Especially those slices.
Why? Why was there such an appetite for risk?
No risk, no reward. In the securities world, financial vehicles whose underlying assets are risky yield higher rates of return. Subprime loans ultimately charge higher rates of interest than prime loans. That means that as long as homeowners don't take advantage of introductory low rates and pay off their loans early, pools of such loans will throw off a higher stream of income than pools of less risky loans. Traders who want to get a piece of that higher stream of income will take the chance of default.
This is where we approach the crucial turning point. Many different parties have been blamed for the housing mess. Homeowners are told that they should have read the fine print on their loans and should have avoided taking on financial obligations that they couldn't meet. Mortgage lenders are blamed for pushing the risky loans in the first place. And of course, there's the maestro, Alan Greenspan. But these attributions of guilt all miss the mark. The incentive for everyone to behave this way came from Wall Street, where the demand for subprime CDOs simply couldn't be satisfied. Wall Street was begging the mortgage industry to reach out to the riskiest borrowers it could find, because it thought it had figured out a way to make any level of risk palatable.
So Wall Street wanted mortgage lenders to make bad loans?
Let's return to our Super Bowl metaphor. The gamblers aren't satisfied with their odds of winning, so they bribe a player to fumble at the one-yard line and alter their bets accordingly. Wall Street traders, hungry for more risk, fixed the real economy to deliver more risk, by essentially bribing the mortgage originators and ratings agencies to fumble the ball or make bad loans on purpose. That supplied CDO speculators the raw material they needed for their bets, but as a consequence threw the integrity of the whole housing sector into question.
But hang on. Isn't the total amount of subprime loans outstanding just a fraction of the overall home-lending market? And isn't the U.S. economy still growing? Why has just one small sector of one country's economy caused so much trouble?
Two main reasons: a lack of transparency and an overabundance of leverage.
What's been described here so far is just the simplest possible model of how things work. The truth of what is really going is far more complex. So complex that no one has a good handle on exactly what will happen if things go awry. Not regulators, not traders, not even pessimistic journalists. Try reading an SEC filing from a New York investment bank -- it is one of the most difficult-to-comprehend documents ever created by the human mind.
It is not, in a word, transparent. It serves the opposite purpose: It is an instrument of obfuscation. Because of failures of regulatory oversight, we have very little idea who owns what, or what risks hedge funds and pension funds and municipalities and mutual funds are really exposed to. This is all fine and dandy if your goal is to prevent your competitors from understanding what kinds of bets you are making. But it becomes a much more severe problem when you're trying to figure what is going wrong when the trains start derailing.
(By the way, if you're looking for something that government could do that might address this problem, calling for greater transparency carries the double whammy of being both the right thing to do and, rhetorically speaking, something that free markets are supposed to depend on for their proper functioning.)
Next up: leverage. Archimedes told us that if he had a lever long enough and a place to put it, he could move the world. Speculators in the world's financial markets also like leverage; but they don't use crowbars to move objects -- they use borrowed money to make bigger bets. This is fine as long as your bets pay off. But when your bets go bad, the people whose money you borrowed want it back.
Right now, a great many people want their money back.
The people who say that subprime is just a small part of the economy are correct. What they fail to note, however, is that the same games that Wall Street played with subprime are likely being played in every sector of the economy. It's not just a Super Bowl whose results can be fixed. The NBA, and Major League Baseball, and the Tour de France and the Olympics are all under the same pressures.
Subprime ripped a window open into the way business as usual is being conducted.
Now everyone wonders, what's next?
-- By Andrew Leonard
Thursday, 16 August 2007
The radar systems and fire control give the vessel its edge. It can see and hit a large number of targets at considerable range. Amazing technology.
Wednesday, 15 August 2007
New Wikipedia Scanner Reveals Online Encyclopedia is Heavily Edited by Corporations, Government and Intelligence Agencies.
"Everyone" knows that Wikipedia is edited and censored by groups that are criticised in the online entries. A new computer program reveals where the alterations are coming from.
Tuesday, 14 August 2007
I found it interesting that of the 26,000 people who bought tickets to the event only 14,000 actually voted. Check out the links.
Monday, 13 August 2007
Good Luck to the crew !!
Damn shuttle concept. They stick the thing on the side of the rocket rather than on top- where the ship would be out of the way of falling bits of ice and foam. Plus the crew compartment is not a separately insulated escape capsule- a design back up that would give the crew additional protection in the case of a catastrophe. Safety features, except for computer back up systems, were thrown out the window.
(UPDATE: Apparently the damage is not critical this time around.)
(2nd UPDATE: Heat shield damage now considered a real risk.)
Sunday, 12 August 2007
Saturday, 11 August 2007
The problem at the moment is that there are a number of seemingly reputable, high profile 911 truth advocates (Fetzer, Woods, Shayler, Reynolds) that seem intent on making crackpot claims about Energy weapons and Holographic aeroplanes. Such claims are clearly unsupportable NONSENSE and seem to be a deliberate attempt to derail the serious efforts to investigate 911 properly and see justice done. These people claim to want proper investigations but spout very improper, illogical arguments.
In this article http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/patriots_question/index.html it suggests that serious 911 researchers need to address these high profile crackpots while also engaging in the legitimate campaign for truth.
The most interesting aspect of the article was that at least two of the above mentioned individuals Shayler and Reynolds have had an association with Intelligence Agencies. Although that is not by itself significant, it does provide a very good explanation as to why such intelligent people keep promoting ludicrous positions such as the "no planes" rubbish. They are effectively "poisoning the evidence well".
Beware of this potential disinformation effort ! Stick to the hard evidence revealed by scientists such as Steven Jones. Thoughtful readers must look for the most reasonable core evidence- straightforward stuff that you can prove to yourself and others. One cannot seriously accept arguments about unprovable invisible energy beams (!) when we have clear scientific evidence of Thermate Explosives being used on 911.
Being able to independently reason is a gift- I can only hope some of our journalists are mature enough to think beyond the disinformation rubbish and get to the hard proof showing that 911 MUST have been an Inside Job.
Thursday, 9 August 2007
The 6th Anniversary of 911: The Validity of the "Inside Job" Hypothesis and the Fight between ones Ego, the Current Paradigm, Ignorance and Logic.
OPEN LETTER TO MAINSTREAM MEDIA BROADCAST JOURNALISTS
Do not let Ego, the Current Paradigm & Ignorance get in the way of Hard Data and Logic.
Once again it is almost upon us- another anniversary of the 911 attacks, and the mainstream media has yet to come to terms with the fact that this horror must have been a false flag operation. Dear reader, before you a priori dismiss this claim I want you to consider the fact that over a 150 Architects and Engineers now support this contention at http://www.ae911truth.org/
Are all these professionals wacko or what ? It is worth a look to see what they have to say.
One thing you must be mindful about is that the Official 911 Report is a pack of lies & later scientific studies backing up this official narrative are also rubbish. The oft cited Popular Mechanics rebuttal to the Inside Job hypothesis is a sham. Likewise the Purdue University endorsement of the official NISTs investigation into the WTC attacks is an absolute joke. The lesson here is that just because a report is written by scientists does not make it scientific.
I do understand that it is very difficult to accept the fact of 911 being an Inside Job but when it comes down to "the crunch" one cannot escape the hard evidence.
You should consider 4 damning physical proofs indicating that Explosive Demolition MUST have been used at the World Trade Centre site, something Bin Laden's men could not have done. They are:
1. the Tons of Molten Steel found in the rubble,
2. the detection of Thermate EXPLOSIVE products in the Steel and Dust taken from Ground Zero,
3. the freefall, low resistance collapse time of all the WTC buildings,
4. the very fact that a third, relatively undamaged skyscraper (WTC 7), collapsed at all.
How the operation was acheived is beyond me, but that is a question for later. As has been pointed out- in typical fire investigations- once evidence of arson, such as petrol residue, is discovered then a criminal investigation is required regardless as to the details of how the petrol was specifically employed. Common sense would tell you that investigation into 911 requires a similar approach.
My primary concern at the moment is that despite damning, irrefutable evidence for the 911 Inside Job, the mainstream media is loath to touch the subject. Ignorant, egotistical and fearful journalists will not even look at the evidence. This is a tragedy that invites more disaster.
If 911 was staged attack I would assume there could very well be another. Recent comments from the US Vice President and Homeland Security Chief, indicate they are expecting further attacks on the US mainland. I'm sure they have something in mind.
Hopefully your show can introduce this subject on the eve of the 6th Anniversary. A discussion about the scientific evidence needs to occur. Something needs to be done to stop the next attacks and soon. Thanks for your time.
-- J. S. Nielsen.
Wednesday, 8 August 2007
Tuesday, 7 August 2007
RECAP: Architects and Engineers For 911 Truth: More than 130 Building Experts say 911 was an Inside Job.
One Hundred and Thirty building experts now accept that the attacks on the World Trade Centre were an inside job. The scientific evidence is overwhelming. Check it out.
1. In a blast furnace.
2. From Explosives.
The rubble pile was not a blast furnace.
Therefore one must assume that explosives were the most likely agent.
Recently the chemical signature for the explosive THERMATE was discovered in multiple samples taken from WTC steel and dust proving explosives WERE used.
At the very least, part of the 911 attacks against the World Trade Centre complex MUST have been an Inside Job - Bin Laden's men could not have gained the necessary access to the buildings.
For those who look, it can be seen that the entire official story is a sham.
The sharade must end. Various Neocons and Military officials need to be arrested NOW and detained. US Judicial Agents and/or Military must act. A new indepentent criminal investigation must be launched. If nothing is done then we face another 911 style false flag terror attack in the very near future and further unnecessary wars.
If you are a US Judge, Congressman, Senator or high ranking Military Official it is your duty to arrest these men. Look into this matter and Act Now -your country is depending on you.
Ron Paul is the only hope for the USA at the moment. He can restore the US Constitution and end the 911 Wars of Iraq and Afghanistan. To win he must go up against the establishment. Good Luck !! (Check out the clip for his views on the Wars.)
Monday, 6 August 2007
Economic expert Mike Whitney explains the dire threat posed by the mountains of debt (borrowed money) that has boosted the markets in recent years: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18119.htm He warns we are likely to see the US markets collapse leading to many bankruptcies which will include a number of US Banks.
sourced from http://www.rense.com/general77/dawn.htm
A Piecemeal Prologue
Half of the American people believe that the Bush administration is on the hunt for Al-Qaeda for the 9/11 attacks. Another half believe that 9/11 was a Bush administration inside job, attributable not to Al-Qaeda, but to "Al-CIA-duh." Both halves, though, agree on one thing, and aren't shy about saying it: This summer we are likely to suffer another terror attack, a "911-2B."
The list of notables' quotables begins with the springtime warning of the vice president to NBC's Tim Russert on Meet the Press:
April 15, 2007, Dick Cheney: "The greatest threat now is 'a 9/11' occurring ... with a nuclear weapon in the middle of one of our own cities."
June 3, 2007, Dennis Milligan, Chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party: "I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001]."
July 1, 2007, ABC News: "A secret U.S. law enforcement report, prepared for the Department of Homeland Security, warns that al Qaeda is planning a terror "spectacular" this summer."
July 11, 2007, Michael Chertoff, Homeland Security chief: "I believe we are entering a period this summer of increased risk."
July 20, 2007, Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury: "Whether authentic or orchestrated, an attack will activate Bush's new executive orders [NSPD-51], which create a dictatorial police state in event of national emergency."
July 24, 2007, Peter DeFazio, House Homeland Security Committee member: "I just can't believe they're going to deny a member of Congress the right of reviewing how they plan to conduct the government of the United States after a significant terrorist attack Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right."
A Recess Review
As Congress goes home for August, opinion polls show that roughly two out of three American citizens either dislike or detest George W. Bush, and things are rapidly falling apart for him. More and more White House officials are invoking executive privilege to avoid answering the hard questions of an exasperated legislative branch about them and their "unitary executive." Alberto Gonzales is the object of a growing congressional impeachment movement, as is Dick Cheney -- and half of the public wants Bush impeached, too.
In the last two weeks the stock market has dropped by nearly a thousand points, and threatens a bearish mauling of the financial sector that has been the Bush administration's base and beneficiary.
His own Republicans are threatening to bail out on busted-down Iraq, unless they get strong reassurances from General David Petraeus in mid-September. The general's situation is hardly reassuring, though. Embattled Baghdad, which he was sent to secure, is currently under fire and without water, and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is publicly calling for his removal.
Wednesday, August 1, could have been the worst day of all for the White House. In the morning came the news that the Iraqi government had fallen apart, with the Sunni faction quitting al-Maliki's cabinet. This disastrous development was likely to hold the headlines until the end of the week, when Congress would head home to discuss this latest war calamity with already war-weary constituents.
A Minnesota Miracle
Wednesday afternoon could have added even more woes to the White House. America's first and only Muslim congressman, Keith Ellison, appeared on CNN's Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer to discuss some scorching anti-Bush comments he had made on July 8 to constituents in Minneapolis, in which he had compared 9/11 to the Reichstag Fire, and George Bush to Adolph Hitler. In 1933 Hitler used the Reichstag Fire, carried out under his orders, to establish a dictatorship in Germany.
Ellison's analysis is accepted by most of the Muslim world, much of the non-Muslim world, and a growing minority of Americans. Rather than defend it, though, Ellison backed down with apologies in his interview with Blitzer, saying that his remarks were a "rookie mistake," never to be repeated.
Perhaps Ellison's retreat from his remarks was an attempt to stave off the disaster that frequently befalls those who disrupt the political paradigm. If so, it didn't work. Two hours after Ellison's mea culpa, his congressional district suffered a freak disaster with the collapse of the I-35 bridge into the Mississippi River.
One man's loss is another's gain, though. In the news, the collapse of the Minneapolis bridge supplanted the collapse of the al-Maliki government and the Bush White House for the rest of Wednesday..., then Thursday..., then Friday. By Saturday the congressman who had accused the unitary executive of treason was with Bush himself, taking a tour of his afflicted district, and begging for the relief of federal funds.
A Cowardly Congress
It's hard to fathom why the Democratic Congress would bow down to the unitary executive before skipping town for summer vacation, but that's just what they have done.
Last week Congress gave the White House the gift of expanded executive power by its approval of the 9/11 Commission's recommendations, further extending the reach of the unitary executive.
Friday, the Senate voted 60-28 in favor of granting Bush and Gonzales more power to conduct domestic surveillance without the trouble of a court warrant. The House followed suit Saturday, with a vote of 227-183.
A Dodging DeFazio
On the same day that the Minneapolis bridge fell into the Mississippi, the White House refused a written request by House Homeland Security chairman Bernie Thompson and Oregon Congressman Peter DeFazio to read classified annexes of NSPD-51, the presidential order, announced in May, by which Bush can declare himself dictator in the event of a natural catastrophe like Katrina -- or a terror attack like 9/11-2B.
DeFazio's Oregon is the target of "Noble Resolve," an upcoming 9/11-2B military exercise scheduled for August 20-24 that includes a nuclear attack on Portland. Pacific Northwesterners are increasingly alarmed that they may be the targets of a false flag nuclear attack, or the fallout from it. You can't blame them. After all, according to all sources, left and right, 911-2B is the only thing that can revitalize the war president and the war plan.
Oregon's DeFazio is unfazed by it all, or pretends to be. Penny Dodge, his chief of staff, refuses to answer questions from media about his failure. DeFazio has taken to the Internet and airwaves to urge his constituents to relax -- despite his inability to examine NSPD-51, and his unwillingness to examine the possibility that they may be targets for a military exercise. He urges trust in the motives of the unitary executive. In doing so DeFazio fails in his duty, and acts the part of Bush's buffoon in a comedy of terrors.
Sunday, 5 August 2007
"I had taken the oath to protect my new country, against all enemies, and this was my chance to serve my country. I assumed the enemy was foreign...
Within a few months, i came across some serious issues. Wrongdoing. Some of those would be considered criminal, within the FBI. Some of those involved security breaches, 911 related cover-ups, and sabotaged intelligence operations. In one case, due to the pressure of the State Dept and Pentagon, the FBI was prevented from criminally investigating certain US officials who were engaged in actions against our national security, having loyalties to other governments."
Saturday, 4 August 2007
Wednesday, 1 August 2007
In this Scholars for 911 Truth and Justice editorial, Professor Steven Jones explains that the aim of his research is to establish strong evidence that can be used in a court of Law or before Congress- so that ultimately justice can be done. The case to be made, he points out, should focus on the best proofs rather than including the more spurious claims.