Thursday, 9 August 2007

The 6th Anniversary of 911: The Validity of the "Inside Job" Hypothesis and the Fight between ones Ego, the Current Paradigm, Ignorance and Logic.


Do not let Ego, the Current Paradigm & Ignorance get in the way of Hard Data and Logic.

Once again it is almost upon us- another anniversary of the 911 attacks, and the mainstream media has yet to come to terms with the fact that this horror must have been a false flag operation. Dear reader, before you a priori dismiss this claim I want you to consider the fact that over a 150 Architects and Engineers now support this contention at
Are all these professionals wacko or what ? It is worth a look to see what they have to say.

One thing you must be mindful about is that the Official 911 Report is a pack of lies & later scientific studies backing up this official narrative are also rubbish. The oft cited Popular Mechanics rebuttal to the Inside Job hypothesis is a sham. Likewise the Purdue University endorsement of the official NISTs investigation into the WTC attacks is an absolute joke. The lesson here is that just because a report is written by scientists does not make it scientific.

I do understand that it is very difficult to accept the fact of 911 being an Inside Job but when it comes down to "the crunch" one cannot escape the hard evidence.

You should consider 4 damning physical proofs indicating that Explosive Demolition MUST have been used at the World Trade Centre site, something Bin Laden's men could not have done. They are:
1. the Tons of Molten Steel found in the rubble,
2. the detection of Thermate EXPLOSIVE products in the Steel and Dust taken from Ground Zero,
3. the freefall, low resistance collapse time of all the WTC buildings,
4. the very fact that a third, relatively undamaged skyscraper (WTC 7), collapsed at all.

How the operation was acheived is beyond me, but that is a question for later. As has been pointed out- in typical fire investigations- once evidence of arson, such as petrol residue, is discovered then a criminal investigation is required regardless as to the details of how the petrol was specifically employed. Common sense would tell you that investigation into 911 requires a similar approach.

My primary concern at the moment is that despite damning, irrefutable evidence for the 911 Inside Job, the mainstream media is loath to touch the subject. Ignorant, egotistical and fearful journalists will not even look at the evidence. This is a tragedy that invites more disaster.

If 911 was staged attack I would assume there could very well be another. Recent comments from the US Vice President and Homeland Security Chief, indicate they are expecting further attacks on the US mainland. I'm sure they have something in mind.

Hopefully your show can introduce this subject on the eve of the 6th Anniversary. A discussion about the scientific evidence needs to occur. Something needs to be done to stop the next attacks and soon. Thanks for your time.

-- J. S. Nielsen.

No comments: